IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1504.00310.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Optimal Investment with Random Endowments and Transaction Costs: Duality Theory and Shadow Prices

Author

Listed:
  • Erhan Bayraktar
  • Xiang Yu

Abstract

This paper studies the utility maximization on the terminal wealth with random endowments and proportional transaction costs. To deal with unbounded random payoffs from some illiquid claims, we propose to work with the acceptable portfolios defined via the consistent price system (CPS) such that the liquidation value processes stay above some stochastic thresholds. In the market consisting of one riskless bond and one risky asset, we obtain a type of super-hedging result. Based on this characterization of the primal space, the existence and uniqueness of the optimal solution for the utility maximization problem are established using the duality approach. As an important application of the duality theorem, we provide some sufficient conditions for the existence of a shadow price process with random endowments in a generalized form as well as in the usual sense using acceptable portfolios.

Suggested Citation

  • Erhan Bayraktar & Xiang Yu, 2015. "Optimal Investment with Random Endowments and Transaction Costs: Duality Theory and Shadow Prices," Papers 1504.00310, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2018.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1504.00310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1504.00310
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luciano Campi & Walter Schachermayer, 2006. "A super-replication theorem in Kabanov’s model of transaction costs," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 579-596, December.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5455 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Julien Hugonnier & Dmitry Kramkov, 2004. "Optimal investment with random endowments in incomplete markets," Papers math/0405293, arXiv.org.
    4. Walter Schachermayer, 2013. "Admissible Trading Strategies under Transaction Costs," Papers 1308.1492, arXiv.org, revised May 2014.
    5. Walter Schachermayer, 2004. "The Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing under Proportional Transaction Costs in Finite Discrete Time," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 19-48, January.
    6. Walter Schachermayer, 2014. "The super-replication theorem under proportional transaction costs revisited," Papers 1405.1266, arXiv.org.
    7. (**), Hui Wang & Jaksa Cvitanic & (*), Walter Schachermayer, 2001. "Utility maximization in incomplete markets with random endowment," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 259-272.
    8. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5980 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Yuri M. Kabanov & Günter Last, 2002. "Hedging under Transaction Costs in Currency Markets: a Continuous‐Time Model," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), pages 63-70, January.
    10. Saul Jacka & Abdelkarem Berkaoui, 2006. "On the density of properly maximal claims in financial markets with transaction costs," Papers math/0602592, arXiv.org, revised May 2007.
    11. Xiang Yu, 2014. "Optimal Consumption under Habit Formation In Markets with Transaction Costs and Random Endowments," Papers 1408.1382, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2016.
    12. Julien Hugonnier & Dmitry Kramkov & Walter Schachermayer, 2005. "On Utility‐Based Pricing Of Contingent Claims In Incomplete Markets," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 203-212, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shuoqing Deng & Xiaolu Tan & Xiang Yu, 2020. "Utility Maximization with Proportional Transaction Costs Under Model Uncertainty," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 1210-1236, November.
    2. Lingqi Gu & Yiqing Lin & Junjian Yang, 2016. "On the existence of shadow prices for optimal investment with random endowment," Papers 1602.01109, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2017.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yiqing Lin & Junjian Yang, 2016. "Utility maximization problem with random endowment and transaction costs: when wealth may become negative," Papers 1604.08224, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2016.
    2. Xiang Yu, 2014. "Optimal Consumption under Habit Formation In Markets with Transaction Costs and Random Endowments," Papers 1408.1382, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2016.
    3. Lingqi Gu & Yiqing Lin & Junjian Yang, 2016. "A note on utility maximization with transaction costs and random endoment: num\'eraire-based model and convex duality," Papers 1602.01070, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2016.
    4. Francesca Biagini & Thomas Reitsam, 2019. "Asset Price Bubbles in market models with proportional transaction costs," Papers 1911.10149, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2020.
    5. Irene Klein & Emmanuel Lépinette & Lavinia Perez-Ostafe, 2014. "Asymptotic arbitrage with small transaction costs," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 917-939, October.
    6. Pietro Siorpaes, 2015. "Optimal investment and price dependence in a semi-static market," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 161-187, January.
    7. Christoph Czichowsky & Walter Schachermayer, 2014. "Duality Theory for Portfolio Optimisation under Transaction Costs," Papers 1408.5989, arXiv.org.
    8. Francesca Biagini & Lukas Gonon & Thomas Reitsam, 2021. "Neural network approximation for superhedging prices," Papers 2107.14113, arXiv.org.
    9. Kasper Larsen & Halil Mete Soner & Gordan Žitković, 2020. "Conditional Davis pricing," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 565-599, July.
    10. Keita Owari, 2011. "A Note on Utility Maximization with Unbounded Random Endowment," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 18(1), pages 89-103, March.
    11. Czichowsky, Christoph & Schachermayer, Walter, 2016. "Duality theory for portfolio optimisation under transaction costs," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 63362, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Paolo Guasoni & Miklós Rásonyi & Walter Schachermayer, 2010. "The fundamental theorem of asset pricing for continuous processes under small transaction costs," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 157-191, March.
    13. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2318 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Christoph Czichowsky & Raphael Huwyler, 2022. "Robust utility maximisation under proportional transaction costs for c\`adl\`ag price processes," Papers 2211.00532, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
    15. Miklos Rasonyi, 2017. "On utility maximization without passing by the dual problem," Papers 1702.00982, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2018.
    16. Giuseppe Benedetti & Luciano Campi, 2011. "Multivariate utility maximization with proportional transaction costs and random endowment," Working Papers hal-00586377, HAL.
    17. Luciano Campi & Mark Owen, 2011. "Multivariate utility maximization with proportional transaction costs," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 461-499, September.
    18. Francesca Biagini & Thomas Reitsam, 2021. "A dynamic version of the super-replication theorem under proportional transaction costs," Papers 2107.02628, arXiv.org.
    19. Kim Weston, 2016. "Stability of utility maximization in nonequivalent markets," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 511-541, April.
    20. Horst, Ulrich & Hu, Ying & Imkeller, Peter & Réveillac, Anthony & Zhang, Jianing, 2014. "Forward–backward systems for expected utility maximization," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 124(5), pages 1813-1848.
    21. Czichowsky, Christoph & Schachermayer, Walter & Yang, Junjian, 2017. "Shadow prices for continuous processes," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 63370, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1504.00310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.