IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1211.4946.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Calculus of Expected Loss: Backtesting Parameter-Based Expected Loss in a Basel II Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Wolfgang Reitgruber

Abstract

The dependency structure of credit risk parameters is a key driver for capital consumption and receives regulatory and scientific attention. The impact of parameter imperfections on the quality of expected loss (EL) in the sense of a fair, unbiased estimate of risk expenses however is barely covered. So far there are no established backtesting procedures for EL, quantifying its impact with regards to pricing or risk adjusted profitability measures. In this paper, a practically oriented, top-down approach to assess the quality of EL by backtesting with a properly defined risk measure is introduced. In a first step, the concept of risk expenses (Cost of Risk) has to be extended beyond the classical provisioning view, towards a more adequate capital consumption approach (Impact of Risk, IoR). On this basis, the difference between parameter-based EL and actually reported Impact of Risk is decomposed into its key components. The proposed method will deepen the understanding of practical properties of EL, reconciles the EL with a clearly defined and observable risk measure and provides a link between upcoming IFRS 9 accounting standards for loan loss provisioning with IRBA regulatory capital requirements. The method is robust irrespective whether parameters are simple, expert based values or highly predictive and perfectly calibrated IRBA compliant methods, as long as parameters and default identification procedures are stable.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolfgang Reitgruber, 2012. "The Calculus of Expected Loss: Backtesting Parameter-Based Expected Loss in a Basel II Framework," Papers 1211.4946, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2013.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1211.4946
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1211.4946
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simone Farinelli & Mykhaylo Shkolnikov, 2012. "Two Models of Stochastic Loss Given Default," Papers 1205.5369, arXiv.org, revised May 2012.
    2. Edward I. Altman & Brooks Brady & Andrea Resti & Andrea Sironi, 2005. "The Link between Default and Recovery Rates: Theory, Empirical Evidence, and Implications," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 78(6), pages 2203-2228, November.
    3. Bernd Engelmann & Robert Rauhmeier (ed.), 2011. "The Basel II Risk Parameters," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-642-16114-8, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wolfgang Reitgruber, 2014. "Methodological thoughts on expected loss estimates for IFRS 9 impairment: hidden reserves, cyclical loss predictions and LGD backtesting," Papers 1411.4265, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2015.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simone Farinelli & Hideyuki Takada, 2014. "Credit Bubbles in Arbitrage Markets: The Geometric Arbitrage Approach to Credit Risk," Papers 1406.6805, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    2. Yi-Ping Chang & Jing-Xiu Lin & Chih-Tun Yu, 2016. "Calculating Value-at-Risk Using the Granularity Adjustment Method in the Portfolio Credit Risk Model with Random Loss Given Default," Journal of Economics and Management, College of Business, Feng Chia University, Taiwan, vol. 12(2), pages 157-176, August.
    3. Dan Cheng & Pasquale Cirillo, 2019. "An Urn-Based Nonparametric Modeling of the Dependence between PD and LGD with an Application to Mortgages," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Annalisa Di Clemente, 2013. "Considering the dependence between the credit loss severity and the probability of default in the estimate of portfolio credit risk: an experimental analysis," STUDI ECONOMICI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(109), pages 5-24.
    5. Wang, Hong & Forbes, Catherine S. & Fenech, Jean-Pierre & Vaz, John, 2020. "The determinants of bank loan recovery rates in good times and bad – New evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 875-897.
    6. Trueck, Stefan & Rachev, Svetlozar T., 2008. "Rating Based Modeling of Credit Risk," Elsevier Monographs, Elsevier, edition 1, number 9780123736833.
    7. Andrea Cipollini & Giuseppe Missaglia, 2008. "Measuring bank capital requirements through Dynamic Factor analysis," Center for Economic Research (RECent) 010, University of Modena and Reggio E., Dept. of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    8. Bank for International Settlements, 2005. "The role of ratings in structured finance: issues and implications," CGFS Papers, Bank for International Settlements, number 23, december.
    9. Santiago Forte & Lidija Lovreta, 2015. "Time†Varying Credit Risk Discovery in the Stock and CDS Markets: Evidence from Quiet and Crisis Times," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 21(3), pages 430-461, June.
    10. Meng-Jou Lu & Cathy Yi-Hsuan Chen & Wolfgang Karl Härdle, 2017. "Copula-based factor model for credit risk analysis," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 949-971, November.
    11. Helmut Elsinger & Alfred Lehar & Martin Summer, 2006. "Risk Assessment for Banking Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(9), pages 1301-1314, September.
    12. repec:onb:oenbwp:y::i:152:b:1 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Thamayanthi Chellathurai, 2017. "Probability Density Of Recovery Rate Given Default Of A Firm’S Debt And Its Constituent Tranches," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(04), pages 1-34, June.
    14. Fathi, Abid & Nader, Naifar, 2007. "Price Calibration of basket default swap: Evidence from Japanese market," MPRA Paper 6013, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Hwang, Ruey-Ching & Chu, Chih-Kang & Yu, Kaizhi, 2020. "Predicting LGD distributions with mixed continuous and discrete ordinal outcomes," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1003-1022.
    16. Rösch, Daniel & Scheule, Harald, 2009. "The Empirical Relation between Credit Quality, Recovery and Correlation," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-418, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    17. Tomas Konecny & Jakub Seidler & Aelta Belyaeva & Konstantin Belyaev, 2017. "The Time Dimension of the Links Between Loss Given Default and the Macroeconomy," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 67(6), pages 462-491, October.
    18. Jochen Güntner & Benjamin Karner, 2023. "The bond agio premium," Economics working papers 2023-13, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
    19. Alain Monfort & Fulvio Pegoraro & Jean-Paul Renne & Guillaume Roussellet, 2021. "Affine Modeling of Credit Risk, Pricing of Credit Events, and Contagion," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3674-3693, June.
    20. Giesecke, Kay & Longstaff, Francis A. & Schaefer, Stephen & Strebulaev, Ilya, 2011. "Corporate bond default risk: A 150-year perspective," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 233-250.
    21. Maalaoui Chun, Olfa & Dionne, Georges & François, Pascal, 2014. "Credit spread changes within switching regimes," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 41-55.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1211.4946. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.