IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/0810.2016.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Hedging of claims with physical delivery under convex transaction costs

Author

Listed:
  • Teemu Pennanen
  • Irina Penner

Abstract

We study superhedging of contingent claims with physical delivery in a discrete-time market model with convex transaction costs. Our model extends Kabanov's currency market model by allowing for nonlinear illiquidity effects. We show that an appropriate generalization of Schachermayer's robust no arbitrage condition implies that the set of claims hedgeable with zero cost is closed in probability. Combined with classical techniques of convex analysis, the closedness yields a dual characterization of premium processes that are sufficient to superhedge a given claim process. We also extend the fundamental theorem of asset pricing for general conical models.

Suggested Citation

  • Teemu Pennanen & Irina Penner, 2008. "Hedging of claims with physical delivery under convex transaction costs," Papers 0810.2016, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:0810.2016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/0810.2016
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. (**), Christophe Stricker & (*), Miklós Rásonyi & Yuri Kabanov, 2002. "No-arbitrage criteria for financial markets with efficient friction," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 371-382.
    2. Kabanov, Yu. M. & Stricker, Ch., 2001. "The Harrison-Pliska arbitrage pricing theorem under transaction costs," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 185-196, April.
    3. Y.M. Kabanov, 1999. "Hedging and liquidation under transaction costs in currency markets," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 237-248.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Teemu Pennanen, 2008. "Arbitrage and deflators in illiquid markets," Papers 0807.2526, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2009.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dmitry B. Rokhlin, 2006. "Constructive no-arbitrage criterion under transaction costs in the case of finite discrete time," Papers math/0603284, arXiv.org.
    2. Matteo Burzoni, 2015. "Arbitrage and Hedging in model-independent markets with frictions," Papers 1512.01488, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2016.
    3. Paolo Guasoni & Emmanuel Lépinette & Miklós Rásonyi, 2012. "The fundamental theorem of asset pricing under transaction costs," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 741-777, October.
    4. Alet Roux, 2016. "Pricing And Hedging Game Options In Currency Models With Proportional Transaction Costs," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(07), pages 1-25, November.
    5. Astic, Fabian & Touzi, Nizar, 2007. "No arbitrage conditions and liquidity," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 692-708, August.
    6. Erhan Bayraktar & Yuchong Zhang, 2016. "Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing Under Transaction Costs and Model Uncertainty," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 1039-1054, August.
    7. Kaval, K. & Molchanov, I., 2006. "Link-save trading," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 710-728, September.
    8. Emmanuel Denis & Yuri Kabanov, 2012. "Consistent price systems and arbitrage opportunities of the second kind in models with transaction costs," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 135-154, January.
    9. Martin Brown & Tomasz Zastawniak, 2020. "Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing under fixed and proportional transaction costs," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 423-433, September.
    10. Tomasz Zastawniak, 2024. "Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing under fixed and proportional costs in multi-asset setting and finite probability space," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 47(1), pages 137-149, June.
    11. Wael Bahsoun & Igor V. Evstigneev & Michael I. Taksar, 2009. "Growth-optimal investments and numeraire portfolios under transaction costs: An analysis based on the von Neumann-Gale model," Papers 0909.4730, arXiv.org.
    12. Roux, Alet, 2011. "The fundamental theorem of asset pricing in the presence of bid-ask and interest rate spreads," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 159-163, March.
    13. Alet Roux & Tomasz Zastawniak, 2013. "American options with gradual exercise under proportional transaction costs," Papers 1308.2688, arXiv.org.
    14. Bruno Bouchard, 2005. "No-arbitrage in discrete-time markets with proportional transaction costs and general information structure," Papers math/0501045, arXiv.org.
    15. Jouini, Elyes, 2001. "Arbitrage and control problems in finance: A presentation," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 167-183, April.
    16. Alet Roux, 2007. "The fundamental theorem of asset pricing under proportional transaction costs," Papers 0710.2758, arXiv.org.
    17. M. Dempster & I. Evstigneev & M. Taksar, 2006. "Asset Pricing and Hedging in Financial Markets with Transaction Costs: An Approach Based on the Von Neumann–Gale Model," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 327-355, October.
    18. Bruno Bouchard & Marcel Nutz, 2014. "Consistent Price Systems under Model Uncertainty," Papers 1408.5510, arXiv.org.
    19. Katsiaryna Kaval & Ilya Molchanov, 2005. "Link-save trading and pricing of contingent claims," Finance 0511017, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Paolo Guasoni & Miklós Rásonyi & Walter Schachermayer, 2010. "The fundamental theorem of asset pricing for continuous processes under small transaction costs," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 157-191, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:0810.2016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.