IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/anp/en2012/007.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Economia Clássica Entre Olaissez-Faire E O Socialismo

Author

Listed:
  • CARLOS LEONARDO KULNIG CINELLI
  • ROGÉRIO ARTHMAR

Abstract

This paper goes through the main classical authors’ positions on the virtues and the limitations of both competition and socialism. The first section retrieves the evolution of socialistic ideas in England until the first half of the nineteenth century, highlighting Owen’s thesis. After that, Smith, Bentham, James Mill and Ricardo’s comments on the equality of incomes, the worker’s condition and private property are presented. The third section rescues some elements in Stuart Mill’s early intellectual formation along with his debate with Thompson over the cooperative system in the London based owenite society. The fourth section covers others influences on Stuart Mill’s social thought, as well as his more moderate reflections on the possible points of conflict or convergence between socialism and individual liberty. Then, some final remarks are made.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Leonardo Kulnig Cinelli & Rogério Arthmar, 2014. "A Economia Clássica Entre Olaissez-Faire E O Socialismo," Anais do XL Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 40th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 007, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    • Handle: RePEc:anp:en2012:007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.anpec.org.br/encontro/2012/inscricao/files_I/i1-70d331ad9ecfb373467ec50f9246e942.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stimson, Shannon C. & Milgate, Murray, 1993. "Utility, Property, and Political Participation: James Mill on Democratic Reform," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 87(4), pages 901-911, December.
    2. repec:bla:econom:v:44:y:1977:i:174:p:145-61 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Ellis, M. A., 1906. "Variations in the Editions of J.S. Mill's Principles of Political Economy," History of Economic Thought Articles, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, vol. 16, pages 291-302, June.
    4. Thomas Sowell, 1963. "The General Glut Controversy Reconsidered," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 193-203.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin, Catherine, 2003. "Une ambiguïté de la relation entre Keynes et Malthus : Rejet de la loi de Say, monnaie et rapport salarial," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 79(1), pages 117-132, Mars-Juin.
    2. Rog?rio Arthmar & Taro Hisamatsu, 2021. "Robert Torrens on Say?s Law and the General Glut," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 10(1), pages 83-105.
    3. Rutherford, R P, 1987. "Malthus and Keynes," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 39(1), pages 175-189, March.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • B10 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - General
    • B12 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Classical (includes Adam Smith)
    • B15 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:anp:en2012:007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rodrigo Zadra Armond (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/anpecea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.