IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxecpp/v15y1963i3p193-203..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The General Glut Controversy Reconsidered

Author

Listed:
  • THOMAS SOWELL

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Sowell, 1963. "The General Glut Controversy Reconsidered," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 193-203.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:15:y:1963:i:3:p:193-203.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a040924
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rutherford, R P, 1987. "Malthus and Keynes," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 39(1), pages 175-189, March.
    2. Martin, Catherine, 2003. "Une ambiguïté de la relation entre Keynes et Malthus : Rejet de la loi de Say, monnaie et rapport salarial," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 79(1), pages 117-132, Mars-Juin.
    3. Rogério Arthmar & Paulo Carlos Leonardo Kulnig Cinelli, 2013. "Economia Clássica entre o Laissez-Faire e o Socialismo," Economia, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics], vol. 14(1a), pages 227-252.
    4. Rog?rio Arthmar & Taro Hisamatsu, 2021. "Robert Torrens on Say?s Law and the General Glut," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 10(1), pages 83-105.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:15:y:1963:i:3:p:193-203.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.