IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aly/journl/201705.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Fourth Industrial Revolution And Labour: A Marxian Theory Of Digital Production

Author

Listed:
  • Shahram Azhar

    (Habib University, Karachi, Pakistan)

Abstract

In recent years the birth of digital production has spurred a lively theoretical debate in political economy, seeking to understand the implications of immaterial labour for the labour theory of value. These discussions have identified a number of theoretical challenges pertaining to the conceptualization of capitalist production in digital space. In particular, scholars have been puzzled by the question of how the notion of abstract labour-time applies to immaterial labour, how the free use of websites applications is compatible with commodity production, what role users play in the production process, and whether digital firms can be simply seen as rent-seekers disengaged from value-production altogether. In this paper I present an answer to these questions using Marxs Circuits of Capital model which allows a clear understanding of commodity production and labour-processes to be drawn in any microeconomic arrangement. I then complement this theoretical analysis with case examinations of the actual revenue processes of two major firms: Facebook and Google. Using this model, I demonstrate how digital production in these firms can be theoretically modelled as capitalist production, and how the monopoly profits of these mega corporations can be seen as ‘unpaid labour extractions from spatially segregated people all across the globe. Thus, in contrast to celebratory accounts that posit digital profits as ‘returns to innovation, the analysis presented here reveals how surplus-value ‘exploitation and the ‘law of uneven development plays itself out in the whole process, allowing the immense benefits of advancements in digital technology like other technological advances under capitalism to remain confined within a tiny elite that is physically located in a few advanced capitalist economies. The paper concludes that the latent possibilities of what has been termed the Fourth Industrial Revolution, despite its socializing and democratizing potential to connect millions of workers to consumers directly without the aid of capitalist intermediaries remain untapped as long as capitalist relations of production predominate the physical, and consequently the virtual economic and political milieu

Suggested Citation

  • Shahram Azhar, "undated". "The Fourth Industrial Revolution And Labour: A Marxian Theory Of Digital Production," Review of Socio - Economic Perspectives 201705, Reviewsep.
  • Handle: RePEc:aly:journl:201705
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.19275/RSEP011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://reviewsep.com/my_documents/my_files/5_Azhar-Full_Paper.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://reviewsep.com/?page_id=243
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.19275/RSEP011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Resnick, Stephen A. & Wolff, Richard D., 1989. "Knowledge and Class," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, edition 1, number 9780226710235, December.
    2. Shaikh, Anwar, 2016. "Capitalism: Competition, Conflict, Crises," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199390632.
    3. Yi-Fen Chen & Chia-Wen Tsai & Shih-Mei Hsu, 2014. "How Online Consumer Reviews Influence Purchase Intention in Virtual Communities?," International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy (IJIDE), IGI Global, vol. 5(3), pages 40-50, July.
    4. Subhajit Basu, 2010. "Direct Taxation and E-Commerce: Possibility and Desirability," International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy (IJIDE), IGI Global, vol. 1(1), pages 37-63, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nikolaus Heimerl, 2023. "Crisis theories: Tendential fall in the rate of profit, underconsumption and economic crises in the 21st century," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 49(1), pages 121-151.
    2. Pascal Seppecher & Isabelle L Salle & Marc Lavoie, 2018. "What drives markups? Evolutionary pricing in an agent-based stock-flow consistent macroeconomic model," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(6), pages 1045-1067.
    3. Tsoulfidis, Lefteris & Tsimis, Achilleas & Paitaridis, Dimitris, 2018. "The Rise and Fall of Unproductive Activities in the US Economy 1964-2015: Facts, Theory and Empirical Evidence," MPRA Paper 84035, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Machado, Pedro S. & Trigg, Andrew B., 2021. "On absolute and comparative advantage in international trade: A Pasinetti pure labour approach," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 375-383.
    5. Ruttan, Vernon W., 2002. "Social Science Knowledge And Institutional Innovation," Staff Papers 13628, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    6. Torres-González, Luis Daniel, 2022. "The Characteristics of the Productive Structure Behind the Empirical Regularities in Production Prices Curves," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 622-659.
    7. Mariano Féliz & María Emilia Millón, 2022. "Crisis and class inequality in Argentina: a new analysis using household survey data," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 405-433, July.
    8. Zambelli, Stefano & Fredholm, Thomas & Venkatachalam, Ragupathy, 2017. "Robust measurement of national technological progress," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 38-55.
    9. Trofimov, Ivan D., 2018. "Income terms of trade and economic convergence: Evidence from Latin America," MPRA Paper 87598, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Juan Barredo-Zuriarrain, 2019. "Money supply is endogenous and the Venezuelan hyperinflation is a monetary phenomenon," Post-Print halshs-03131095, HAL.
    11. Lefteris Tsoulfidis & Dimitris Paitaridis, 2019. "Capital intensity, unproductive activities and the Great Recession in the US economy," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 43(3), pages 623-647.
    12. Robert A. Blecker & Mark Setterfield, 2020. "On multi-sector and multi-technique models, production functions and Goodwin cycles: a reply to Libman," European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 17(3), pages 295-306, November.
    13. Puty, Cláudio Alberto Castelo Branco, 2018. "Sectoral mark-ups in U.S. Manufacturing," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 107-125.
    14. David Dequech, 2008. "Varieties of uncertainty: a survey of the economic literature," Anais do XXXVI Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 36th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 200807211223070, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    15. Jonathan F Cogliano, 2023. "Marx’s equalised rate of exploitation," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 47(1), pages 133-169.
    16. Lucrezia Fanti, 2018. "An AB-SFC Model of Induced Technical Change along Classical and Keynesian Lines," Working Papers 3/18, Sapienza University of Rome, DISS.
    17. Patrick Mokre & Miriam Rehm, 2020. "Inter-industry wage inequality: persistent differences and turbulent equalisation," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 44(4), pages 919-942.
    18. Trofimov, Ivan D., 2018. "Industry rates of return in Korea and alternative theories of competition: equalising convergence versus tendential equalisation," MPRA Paper 88390, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Sayonee Majumdar, 2018. "Disinterring the Transition Debate in Maoist China," Arthaniti: Journal of Economic Theory and Practice, , vol. 17(1), pages 83-111, June.
    20. Juan Pablo Mateo, 2017. "The profit rate and asset-price inflation in the Spanish economy," Working Papers 1721, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Digital Economy; Technology and Capitalism; Facebook Business Model;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B51 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Socialist; Marxian; Sraffian
    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aly:journl:201705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Veysel KAYA (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/degraus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.