IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aim/wpaimx/2429.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bayesian inference for income inequality using a Pareto II tail with an uncertain threshold: Combining EU-SILC and WID data

Author

Abstract

When estimated from survey data alone, the distribution of high incomes in a population may be misrepresented, as surveys typically provide detailed coverage of the lower part of the income distribution, but offer limited information on top incomes. Tax data, in contrast, better capture top incomes, but lack contextual information. To combine these data sources, Pareto models are often used to represent the upper tail of the income distribution. In this paper, we propose a Bayesian approach for this purpose, building on extreme value theory. Our method integrates a Pareto II tail with a semi-parametric model for the central part of the income distribution, and it selects the income threshold separating them endogenously. We incorporate external tax data through an informative prior on the Pareto II coefficient to complement survey micro-data. We find that Bayesian inference can yield a wide range of threshold estimates, which are sensitive to how the central part of the distribution is modelled. Applying our methodology to the EU-SILC micro-data set for 2008 and 2018, we find that using tax-data information from WID introduces no changes to inequality estimates for Nordic countries or The Netherlands, which rely on administrative registers for income data. However, tax data significantly revise survey-based inequality estimates in new EU member states.

Suggested Citation

  • Mathias Silva & Michel Lubrano, 2024. "Bayesian inference for income inequality using a Pareto II tail with an uncertain threshold: Combining EU-SILC and WID data," AMSE Working Papers 2429, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
  • Handle: RePEc:aim:wpaimx:2429
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.amse-aixmarseille.fr/sites/default/files/working_papers/wp_2024_-_nr_29.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    top income correction; Pareto II; Bayesian inference; extreme value theory; EU-SILC;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C11 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Bayesian Analysis: General
    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aim:wpaimx:2429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gregory Cornu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/amseafr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.