IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ahh/wpaper/worms1606.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Factors determining the course of research projects, in the opinion of different groups of stakeholders

Author

Listed:
  • Jagoda Mrzyglocka-Chojnacka
  • Radoslaw Rynca

Abstract

This article is devoted to the issue of project assessment, in particular with regard to identification of factors affecting the success of their execution. The primary purpose of the article is to attempt to determine the factors conditioning the course of the project execution from the perspective of different groups of stakeholders, above all, in the opinion of project managers and executors (members of project teams). For this purpose, the authors used a survey of the literature and analysis of own quantitative research. The research results have revealed that, from the perspective of managers and executors of research projects, the most important factors determining the projects' progress are directly related to the characteristics and structure of the project and the activities of the executor teams. This subject matter is significant both due to cognitive, as well as practical reasons. It provides useful knowledge both with regard to management sciences, as well as information resource important for project managers and executors.

Suggested Citation

  • Jagoda Mrzyglocka-Chojnacka & Radoslaw Rynca, 2016. "Factors determining the course of research projects, in the opinion of different groups of stakeholders," WORking papers in Management Science (WORMS) WORMS/16/06, Department of Operations Research and Business Intelligence, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology.
  • Handle: RePEc:ahh:wpaper:worms1606
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://worms.pwr.edu.pl/RePEc/ahh/wpaper/WORMS_16_06.pdf
    File Function: Original version, 2020
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Research projects; Assessment of project progress factors; Stakeholders of research projects;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • M00 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General - - - General
    • O22 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Project Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ahh:wpaper:worms1606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anna Kowalska-Pyzalska (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/kbpwrpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.