IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uwauwp/100881.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Area-Wide Management of Fruit-Flies: What are the Costs and the Benefits?

Author

Listed:
  • Florec, Veronique
  • Sadler, Rohan
  • White, Benedict

Abstract

Increasing volumes and speed of agricultural trade and the opening of new markets for agricultural products create greater challenges to systems established to protect countries from invasive organisms that can be harmful to human and animal health, crops and natural environments. In reaction to the threat of exotic pests and diseases, the World Trade Organization recognises the right of country members to protect themselves from the risks posed by exotic pests and diseases through the application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) measures. One possible response from exporting countries facing SPS trade barriers is to obtain pest-free area (PFA) certification. While large benefits can potentially be achieved from greater access to world markets through the establishment and maintenance of a PFA, certification can be expensive. This paper aims to identify a theoretical framework on which to base the cost benefit analysis and the costs and benefits to be measured, from which a methodology for measuring costs and benefits may be developed. The literature relevant to analysing PFAs reveals that cost benefit analysis of the establishment of PFAs incorporate complex links between the economic aspects of this type of pest management and the biological characteristics of the pest or disease targeted and its environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Florec, Veronique & Sadler, Rohan & White, Benedict, 2010. "Area-Wide Management of Fruit-Flies: What are the Costs and the Benefits?," Working Papers 100881, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uwauwp:100881
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.100881
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/100881/files/wp100008.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.100881?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Unknown, 2002. "Impact of a Foot and Mouth Disease Outbreak on Australia," Commissioned Studies 31919, Productivity Commission.
    2. Productivity Commission, 2002. "Impact of a foot and mouth disease outbreak on Australia," Others 0207001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cook, David C. & Fraser, Rob W. & Weinert, Andrew S., 2013. "An Example of How Chemical Regulation is Affecting Biosecurity Policy-Making: Mediterranean Fruit Fly in Western Australia," 2013 Conference (57th), February 5-8, 2013, Sydney, Australia 152142, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    2. Cook, David C. & Fraser, Rob W. & Weinert, Andrew S., 2013. "Eradication vs. Control in Biosecurity Policy-Making: Mediterranean Fruit Fly in Western Australia," 87th Annual Conference, April 8-10, 2013, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 158701, Agricultural Economics Society.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. D.B. Smorfitt & S.R. Harrison & J.L. Herbohn, 2005. "Potential Economic Implications for Regional Tourism of a Foot and Mouth Disease Outbreak in North Queensland," Tourism Economics, , vol. 11(3), pages 411-430, September.
    2. Tom Kompas & Pham Van Ha & Hoa-Thi-Minh Nguyen & Graeme Garner & Sharon Roche & Iain East, 2020. "Optimal surveillance against foot-and-mouth disease: A sample average approximation approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Mike Webb & John Gibson & Anna Strutt, 2017. "The Importance of Biosecurity: How Diseases Can Affect International Beef Trade," Working Papers in Economics 17/13, University of Waikato.
    4. Olaniyi, Oladokun Nafiu & Szulczyk, Kenneth R., 2020. "Estimating the economic damage and treatment cost of basal stem rot striking the Malaysian oil palms," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    5. Tozer, Peter & Marsh, Thomas, 2012. "Domestic and trade impacts of foot-and-mouth disease on the Australian beef industry," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 56(3), pages 1-20.
    6. Nunn, Mike J., 2012. "Australia’s biosecurity: future challenges for animal industries," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 8(2), pages 1-7, April.
    7. Malcolm, Bill, 2003. "What Price Animal Health - And Whose Problem is it Anyway?," Papers 234167, University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Land and Environment.
    8. Kompas, Tom & Ha, Pham Van & Nguyen, Hoa Thi Minh & East, Iain & Roche, Sharon & Garner, Graeme, 2017. "Optimal surveillance against foot-and-mouth disease: the case of bulk milk testing in Australia," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 61(4), October.
    9. Webb, Mike & Gibson, John & Strutt, Anna, 2018. "The impact of diseases on international beef trade: Market switching and persistent effects," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 93-108.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uwauwp:100881. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aruwaau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.