IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/unaaed/269533.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Analysis Of Profitability And Factors Influencing Adoption Of Agro-Ecological Intensification (Aei) Techniques In Yatta Sub- County, Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • WANGO, VIRGINIAH
  • MBURU, JOHN
  • NYIKAL, ROSE
  • ONWONG'A, RICHARD

Abstract

Decline in soil fertility is considered as one of the most important causes of low agriculture productivity in sub-Sahara Africa. Initiatives to address soil fertility through use of inorganic fertilizers have yielded below average results in increasing productivity. Agro-ecological intensification (AEI) techniques use alternative knowledge and local materials to improve soil fertility and increase productivity. There is, however, little evidence of the economic viability and adoption levels of the AEI technique. There is a gap in understanding of the factors influencing the adoption of AEI techniques and the profitability of this innovation. This study assessed the profitability, level of adoption and factors influencing adoption of agro-ecological intensification technique in Yatta Sub-county, Kenya. Household survey data on demographic characteristic, soil management practices, production and yield from a sample of 140 randomly selected households in Yatta Sub-county was collected. Gross margin analysis and Poisson regression model were used to analyze the data on profitability and factors influencing adoption respectively. Farmers adopted various components, farm yard (95%), crop diversity (77%), compost manure (76%), utilization of crop residue (72%), cover cropping (57%) and crop rotation (54%). About 40 percent of farmers had adopted at least one component of the AEI techniques while 28 percent of surveyed farmers had fully adopted all components studied. Gross margin analysis showed that farmers practicing AEI technique increased their yield and attained higher profits than farmers without the technique. Results from the Poisson Regression model showed that farm income, age, level of education of household head, and number of extension contacts, among other factors, had significant influence in adoption of the agro-ecological intensification techniques. These findings give insight into the potential for further development of agro-ecological intensification techniques. Policies that enhance adoption through targeted extension should be encouraged.

Suggested Citation

  • Wango, Virginiah & Mburu, John & Nyikal, Rose & Onwong'A, Richard, 2016. "An Analysis Of Profitability And Factors Influencing Adoption Of Agro-Ecological Intensification (Aei) Techniques In Yatta Sub- County, Kenya," Dissertations and Theses 269533, University of Nairobi, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:unaaed:269533
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.269533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/269533/files/V.N%20WANGO%20THESIS%20FINAL.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/269533/files/V.N%20WANGO%20THESIS%20FINAL.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.269533?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajayi, Olu Clifford & Matakala, Patrick, 2006. "Environmental Conservation and Food Security in Developing Countries: Bridging the Disconnect," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25636, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Otieno, Zipora & Okello, Julius J. & Nyikal, Rose & Mwang'ombe, Agnes & Clavel, Daniele, 2011. "The role of varietal traits in the adoption of improved dryland crop varieties: The case of pigeon pea in Kenya," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 6(2), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Gruhn, Peter & Goletti, Francesco & Yudelman, Montague, 2000. "Integrated nutrient management, soil fertility, and sustainable agriculture: current issues and future challenges," 2020 vision discussion papers 32, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Marenya, Paswel Phiri & Barrett, Christopher B., 2009. "The effect of soil quality on fertilizer use rates among smallholder farmers in western Kenya," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 51671, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Paswel P. Marenya & Christopher B. Barrett, 2009. "Soil quality and fertilizer use rates among smallholder farmers in western Kenya," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 40(5), pages 561-572, September.
    6. repec:bla:devpol:v:24:y:2006:i:3:p:243-277 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Oecd, 2009. "Climate Change and Africa," OECD Journal: General Papers, OECD Publishing, vol. 2009(1), pages 5-35.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thedy Gerald Kimbi & Essegbemon Akpo & Eliud Kongola & Chris O. Ojiewo & Ronnie Vernooy & Geoffrey Muricho & Justin Ringo & Gerald Alex Lukurugu & Rajeev Varshney & Ramadjita Tabo, 2024. "A Probit Analysis of Determinants of Adoption of Improved Sorghum Technologies Among Farmers in Tanzania," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(1), pages 1-73, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asjad Tariq Sheikh & Atakelty Hailu & Amin Mugera & Ram Pandit & Stephen Davies, 2024. "Soil quality evaluation for irrigated agroecological zones of Punjab, Pakistan: The Luenberger indicator approach," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(3), pages 531-553, May.
    2. William J. Burke & Sieglinde S. Snapp & Thom S. Jayne, 2020. "An in‐depth examination of maize yield response to fertilizer in Central Malawi reveals low profits and too many weeds," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(6), pages 923-940, November.
    3. Awudu Abdulai, 2023. "Information acquisition and the adoption of improved crop varieties," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(4), pages 1049-1062, August.
    4. Mathenge, Mary K. & Smale, Melinda & Olwande, John, 2012. "The Impact of Maize Hybrids on Income, Poverty, and Inequality among Smallholder Farmers in Kenya," Food Security International Development Working Papers 146931, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    5. Berazneva, Julia & McBride, Linden & Sheahan, Megan & Güereña, David, 2018. "Empirical assessment of subjective and objective soil fertility metrics in east Africa: Implications for researchers and policy makers," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 367-382.
    6. Jeremy Foltz & Ursula Aldana & Paul Laris, 2014. "The Sahel's Silent Maize Revolution: Analyzing Maize Productivity in Mali at the Farm Level," NBER Chapters, in: African Successes, Volume IV: Sustainable Growth, pages 111-136, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Lenis Saweda O. Liverpool-Tasie, 2017. "Is fertiliser use inconsistent with expected profit maximization in sub-Saharan Africa? “Evidence from Nigeria”," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(1), pages 22-44, February.
    8. Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O. & Omonona, Bolarin T. & Sanou, Awa & Ogunleye, Wale O., 2017. "Is increasing inorganic fertilizer use for maize production in SSA a profitable proposition? Evidence from Nigeria," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 41-51.
    9. Kasirye, Ibrahim, 2013. "Constraints to Agricultural Technology Adoption in Uganda: Evidence from the 2005/06-2009/10 Uganda National Panel Survey," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 8(2), pages 1-18, August.
    10. Hasibuan, Abdul Muis & Gregg, Daniel & Stringer, Randy, 2022. "Risk preferences, intra-household dynamics and spatial effects on chemical inputs use: Case of small-scale citrus farmers in Indonesia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    11. Bevis, Leah E.M. & Conrad, Jon M. & Barrett, Christopher B. & Gray, Clark, 2017. "State-conditioned soil investment in rural Uganda," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 254-281.
    12. Mugizi, Francisco M.P. & Matsumoto, Tomoya, 2021. "A curse or a blessing? Population pressure and soil quality in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from rural Uganda," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    13. Hongbin Liu & Zhanli Sun & Xiaojuan Luo & Xiuru Dong & Mengyao Wu, 2020. "A Spatial-Temporal Analysis of the Effects of Households’ Land-use Behaviors on Soil Available Potassium in Cropland: A Case Study from Urban Peripheral Region in Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-19, May.
    14. Hassen, Sied, 2018. "The effect of farmyard manure on the continued and discontinued use of inorganic fertilizer in Ethiopia: An ordered probit analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 523-532.
    15. Ozaki, Ryosuke & Tsujimoto, Yasuhiro & Andriamananjara, Andry & Rakotonindrina, Hobimiarantsoa & Sakurai, Takeshi, 2021. "Impact of Information of Expected Effectiveness Based on Soil Quality on Farmers’ Decision of Fertilizer Use: Evidence from Madagascar," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315272, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Berazneva, Julia & McBride, Linden & Sheahan, Megan & Guerena, David, 2016. "Perceived, measured, and estimated soil fertility in east Africa: Implications for farmers and researchers," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235466, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Martina Bozzola & Tim Swanson & Helena Ting, 2016. "Transfer of improved varieties in informal markets and the diffusion of embedded innovation: experimentation with genetic resources in Uganda," CIES Research Paper series 46-2016, Centre for International Environmental Studies, The Graduate Institute.
    18. Ortega, David L. & Waldman, Kurt B. & Richardson, Robert B. & Clay, Daniel C. & Snapp, Sieglinde, 2016. "Sustainable Intensification and Farmer Preferences for Crop System Attributes: Evidence from Malawi’s Central and Southern Regions," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 139-151.
    19. Macours, Karen & Behaghel, Luc & Gignoux, Jérémie, 2020. "Social learning in agriculture: does smallholder heterogeneity impede technology diffusion in Sub-Saharan Africa?," CEPR Discussion Papers 15220, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    20. Muyanga, Milu & Jayne, T.S., 2014. "Effects of rising rural population density on smallholder agriculture in Kenya," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 98-113.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:unaaed:269533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://agrieconomics.uonbi.ac.ke/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.