IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/umrfwp/14308.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Convenience Store Practices And Progress With Efficient Consumer Response: The Minnesota Case

Author

Listed:
  • Ashman, Sara M.
  • King, Robert P.

Abstract

The adoption of Efficient Consumer Response (ECR) practices by Minnesota convenience store (C- store) is explained in this study. Data were collected through a mail survey distributed to more than 250 Minnesota C-stores ranging in size from single, independently owned stores to over 100 store chains. The survey instrument was developed to collect data on the following components important to C-store operations and the implementation of ECR: information systems, ordering, receiving, inventory management, and pricing practices. Findings are presented from three distinct perspectives: 1. Location: Rural C-stores, which often meet customer needs that were once met by small supermarkets, carried a wider range of products and offered more services than C-stores in urban and suburban locations. However, rural stores had the lowest adoption rate for practices related to the ECR initiative. Urban chains coordinated business practices with suppliers to a greater degree than suburban and rural chains. 2. Chain size: Larger chains were more likely to have implemented the more costly technological practices than were small chains. This was expected since large chains can spread the fixed costs of ECR adoption over a larger number of stores. Larger chains also cooperated and communicated more with their suppliers than small chains. Again, this was expected, since larger chains can economize on transaction costs involved in maintaining these business relationships. 3. ECR practices: ECR adoption and superior performance were positively related. Having adopted six to nine practices was positively correlated with higher inside and outside sales per square foot of selling area and higher annual inventory turns. However, it was not clear whether there was a causal relationship in either direction between ECR practices and store performance. The C-store industry is changing, as new information technologies, new business practices, and new retail strategies are developed. The results from this survey can serve as a baseline for future research monitoring the adoption of these innovations and assessing their impact on productivity and profitability. Minnesota C-Stores appear to be smaller but more productive than the national average. Overall, it appears ECR is just beginning to impact the Minnesota C-store industry. Nonetheless, regression analyses confirmed ECR practices are positively related to store sales performance and those stores adopting the most practices had higher productivity measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashman, Sara M. & King, Robert P., 1998. "Convenience Store Practices And Progress With Efficient Consumer Response: The Minnesota Case," Working Papers 14308, University of Minnesota, The Food Industry Center.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:umrfwp:14308
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.14308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/14308/files/tr98-03.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.14308?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Phumpiu, Paul F. & King, Robert P., 1997. "Adoption Of Ecr Practices In Minnesota Grocery Stores," Working Papers 14311, University of Minnesota, The Food Industry Center.
    2. Kiernan, Patrick, 1995. "Joint Industry Project On Efficient Consumer Response (Ecr)," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 26(1), pages 1-2, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dooley, Frank J. & Roucan, Maud & King, Robert P., 2004. "Ecr And The Importance Of Collaboration For Supermarkets," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20368, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. King, Robert P. & Ashman, Sara M. & Bosley, Stacie A., 1998. "Store-Level Innovation In The Retail Food Industry: The Ecr Initiative And Beyond," Conference Papers 14484, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
    3. Marcus, Alfred & Spielmann, Brian & Qu, Lu, 1997. "Competence Acquisition In Retail Food: Efficient Consumer Response And Environmental Management," Working Papers 14345, University of Minnesota, The Food Industry Center.
    4. Dooley, Frank J. & Akridge, Jay T., 1998. "Supply Chain Management: A Case Study Of Issues For Bioag," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 1(3), pages 1-7.
    5. Dooley, Frank J. & Mayberry, Matthew & Wilson, Christine A. & Boehlje, Michael, 2002. "Assessing The Effect Of Ecr On Financial And Operating Performance," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19788, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Larson, Ronald B., 1997. "Key Developments In The Food Distribution System," Working Papers 14350, University of Minnesota, The Food Industry Center.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Industrial Organization; Marketing;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:umrfwp:14308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rfumnus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.