IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/umcowp/256682.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Comparison of Conservation Compliance and Water Pollution Control Strategies for an Agricultural Watershed

Author

Listed:
  • Prato, Tony
  • Shi, Hongqi

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Prato, Tony & Shi, Hongqi, 1989. "A Comparison of Conservation Compliance and Water Pollution Control Strategies for an Agricultural Watershed," Working Papers 256682, University of Missouri Columbia, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:umcowp:256682
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.256682
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/256682/files/agecon-missouri-102.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.256682?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Crowder, Bradley M. & Young, C. Edwin, 1985. "Modeling Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution For Economic Evaluation Of The Conestoga Headwaters Rcwp Project," Staff Reports 277785, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Soil Conservation Service, 1987. "Soil Erosion by Water," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309371, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Setia, Parveen P. & Magleby, Richard S. & Carvey, David G., 1988. "Illinois Rural Clean Water Project: An Economic Analysis," Staff Reports 278054, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Braden, J.B. & Johnson, G.V., 1985. "Efficiency of Sediment Control Policies," Illinois Agricultural Economics Staff Paper 244644, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics.
    5. Ribaudo, Marc O., 1986. "Reducing Soil Erosion: Offsite Benefits," Agricultural Economic Reports 308013, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prato, Tony & Shi, Hongqi, 1989. "A Comparison of Conservation Compliance and Water Pollution Control Strategies for an Agricultural Watershed," 1989 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 2, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 270487, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Ribaudo, Marc O., 1989. "Water Quality Benefits from the Conservation Reserve Program," Agricultural Economic Reports 308069, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Mafoua, Edouard & Hornbaker, Robert H., 2006. "Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Environmental Policies for Reducing Non-Point Source Pollution in Public Water Supplies," 2006 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2006, Orlando, Florida 35297, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    4. Prato, Tony & Wu, Shunxiang, 1991. "Soil Conservation Benefits of Sustainable Cropping Systems," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271072, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Kozloff, Keith, 1990. "An Evaluation Of Options For Micro-Targeting Acquisition Of Cropping Rights To Reduce Nonpoint Source Water Pollution," Staff Papers 13610, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    6. Margheim, Gary A., 1987. "Implementing conservation compliance," Agricultural Outlook Forum Archive 1923 - 1997 326445, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Outlook Forum.
    7. Young, C. Edwin & Crowder, Bradley M., 1986. "Managing Nutrient Losses: Some Empirical Results On The Potential Water Quality Effects," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 15(2), pages 1-7, October.
    8. Magleby, Richard & Sandretto, Carmen & Crosswhite, William & Osborn, C. Tim, 1995. "Soil Erosion and Conservation in the United States: An Overview," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309733, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Atwood, Jay D. & Knight, Lynn & Cattaneo, Andrea & Smith, Peter F., 2003. "Benefit Cost Analysis Of The 2002 Eqip Farm Bill Provisions," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 21992, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    10. Prato, Anthony, 1989. "Economic Efficiency of Erosion and Water Pollution Control in an Agricultural Watershed," WAEA/ WFEA Conference Archive (1929-1995) 244967, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    11. Jordan, Jeffrey L. & Elnagheeb, Abdelmoneim H., 1992. "The Structure Of Citizen Preferences For Government Soil Erosion Control Programs," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(2), pages 1-10, December.
    12. Crutchfield, Stephen R., 1988. "Agricultural Externalities and Environmental Policy: Re-Emergence of an Old Issue," 1988 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Knoxville, Tennessee 270414, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    13. Nick Hanley & Carol A. Salt & Mike Wilson & Meara Culligan‐Dunsmore, 2001. "Evaluating alternative “countermeasures” against food contamination resulting from nuclear accidents," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 92-109, May.
    14. Lakshminarayan, P. G. & Atwood, J. D. & Johnson, Stanley R. & Sposito, V. A., 1991. "Compromise Solution for Economic-Environmental Decisions in Agriculture," Staff General Research Papers Archive 375, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    15. Johansson, Robert C. & Cooper, Joseph & Peters, Mark, 2006. "An agri-environmental assessment of trade liberalization," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 37-48, June.
    16. C. Rendleman & Kenneth Reinert & James Tobey, 1995. "Market-based systems for reducing chemical use in agriculture in the United States," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 5(1), pages 51-70, January.
    17. Crowder, Bradley & Young, C. Edwin, 1988. "Managing Farm Nutrients: Tradeoffs for Surface- and Ground-Water Quality," Agricultural Economic Reports 308038, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    18. Padgitt, Merritt & Newton, Doris & Penn, Renata & Sandretto, Carmen, 2000. "Production Practices for Major Crops in U.S. Agriculture, 1990-97," Statistical Bulletin 262287, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    19. Goetz, Renan-Ulrich & Keusch, Alois, 2005. "Dynamic efficiency of soil erosion and phosphor reduction policies combining economic and biophysical models," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 201-218, January.
    20. Sergio Colombo & Nick Hanley & Javier Calatrava‐Requena, 2005. "Designing Policy for Reducing the Off‐farm Effects of Soil Erosion Using Choice Experiments," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 81-95, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Land Economics/Use;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:umcowp:256682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daumous.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.