IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/umaesp/13611.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evidence of a Market Effect from Conservation Easements

Author

Listed:
  • Taff, Steven J.

Abstract

Both federal income tax law and local property tax assessment practice are premised on the "theory" that permanent conservation restrictions reduce property values, while shorter term restrictions do not. An analysis of 190 recent sales of Minnesota agricultural land with varying cropping rights restrictions supports only a portion of this theory. Both permanent and short-term restrictions were negatively and significantly associated with per-acre sales prices. The former effect is consistent with the theory and is statistically meaningful, but the dataset contained too few sales with permanent restrictions to warrant a strong conclusion. The latter effect is inconsistent with the theory, but is strongly supported by the data.

Suggested Citation

  • Taff, Steven J., 2004. "Evidence of a Market Effect from Conservation Easements," Staff Papers 13611, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:umaesp:13611
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.13611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/13611/files/p04-09.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.13611?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taff, Steven J., 2004. "Minnesota Farm Real Estate Sales: 1990-2003," Staff Papers 14166, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    2. Taff, Steven J., 2003. "Minnesota Farm Real Estate Sales: 1990 - 2002," Staff Papers 14065, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    3. Steven D. Shultz & Steven J. Taff, 2004. "Implicit Prices of Wetland Easements in Areas of Production Agriculture," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 80(4).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anderson, Kathryn & Weinhold, Diana, 2008. "Valuing future development rights: The costs of conservation easements," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1-2), pages 437-446, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ay, Jean-Sauveur & Latruffe, Laure, 2013. "The Empirical Content of the Present Value Model: A survey of the instrumental uses of farmland prices," Working papers 157112, Factor Markets, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    2. Bostian, Moriah B. & Dupraz, Pierre & Minviel, Jean Joseph, 2015. "Production effects of wetland conservation: evidence from France," Working Papers 210465, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    3. Eric Asare & Lloyd‐Smith Patrick & Belcher Kenneth, 2022. "Spatially explicit modeling of wetland conservation costs in Canadian agricultural landscapes," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 70(1), pages 5-19, March.
    4. Tsoodle, Leah J. & Featherstone, Allen M. & Golden, Bill B., 2005. "Estimating the Market Value of Agricultural Land in Kansas Using a Combination of Hedonic and Negative Exponential Techniques," 2005 Agricultural and Rural Finance Markets in Transition, October 3-4, 2005, Minneapolis, Minnesota 132763, Regional Research Committee NC-1014: Agricultural and Rural Finance Markets in Transition.
    5. Carriazo, Fernando & Ready, Richard & Shortle, James, 2013. "Using stochastic frontier models to mitigate omitted variable bias in hedonic pricing models: A case study for air quality in Bogotá, Colombia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 80-88.
    6. Shultz, Steven & Pool, Duane, 2005. "The Impact of Combined Grass and Wetland Easements on Agricultural Land Values in South Dakota," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2005, pages 1-6.
    7. Grout, Cyrus A. & Jaeger, William K. & Plantinga, Andrew J., 2011. "Land-use regulations and property values in Portland, Oregon: A regression discontinuity design approach," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 98-107, March.
    8. Bin, Okmyung & Polasky, Stephen, 2005. "Evidence on the Amenity Value of Wetlands in a Rural Setting," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 37(3), pages 1-14, December.
    9. repec:ags:aaea22:335462 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Harpankar, Kshama & Taff, Steven J., 2004. "Tracking the Effects of Conservation Easements on Property Tax Valuations," Staff Papers 13493, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    11. Chad Lawley, 2014. "Changes in Implicit Prices of Prairie Pothole Habitat," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 62(2), pages 171-190, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Land Economics/Use;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:umaesp:13611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daumnus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.