IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/umaesp/13592.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A "Disjointed Incrementalist'S" Approach To Measuring Research Benefits And Costs

Author

Listed:
  • Fishel, Walter L.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Fishel, Walter L., 1971. "A "Disjointed Incrementalist'S" Approach To Measuring Research Benefits And Costs," Staff Papers 13592, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:umaesp:13592
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.13592
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/13592/files/21440.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.13592?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arnold Paulsen & Donald R. Kaldor, 1968. "Evaluation and Planning of Research in the Experiment Station," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 50(5), pages 1149-1161.
    2. Fishel, Walter L., 1970. "The Minnesota Agricultural Research Resource Allocation Information System And Experiment," Staff Papers 13726, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Norton, George W. & Davis, Jeffrey S., 1979. "Review Of Methods Used To Evaluate Returns To Agricultural Research," Staff Papers 13520, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    2. Farrell E. Jensen & C. Arden Pope, 1987. "The changing structure of US agriculture and implications for research in agribusiness firms," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 3(2), pages 139-150.
    3. Parvin, David W., Jr. & Tyner, Fred H., 1974. "The Systems Approach -- Research Or Research Management," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 6(1), pages 1-9, July.
    4. Norton, George W. & Schuh, G. Edward, 1981. "Evaluating Returns to Social Science Research: Issues and Possible Methods," Evaluation of Agricultural Research, Proceedings of a Workshop, Minneapolis, MN, May 12-13, 1980, Miscellaneous Publication 8 49076, University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station.
    5. Scobie, Grant M., 1984. "Investment in Agricultural Research: Some Economic Principles," Economics Working Papers 232447, CIMMYT: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:umaesp:13592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daumnus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.