IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/umaesp/13360.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Model Of Optimal Public Investment In U.S. Agricultural Research

Author

Listed:
  • Fox, Glenn

Abstract

This paper examines three claims of inefficient allocation of public expenditure in publicly funded agricultural research in the United States. It has been argued by analysts of research policy that: 1. The overall level of public investment in agricultural research is less than what would be socially optimal. 2. The present composition of public research investment is excessively myopic in that too little basic research is performed relative to the level of applied research. 3. The allocation of research resources among commodities is inconsistent with economic efficiency. A nonlinear optimal growth model of the U.S. economy was employed to test these propositions. Strong support was found for the claim that the overall level of investment has been adequate. No support was found for the contention that basic research has been relatively underfunded compared to applied research. Weak support was found for the view that crop research has suffered from more acute underfunding than has livestock research.

Suggested Citation

  • Fox, Glenn, 1985. "A Model Of Optimal Public Investment In U.S. Agricultural Research," Staff Papers 13360, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:umaesp:13360
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.13360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/13360/files/p85-33.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.13360?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul R. Johnson, 1977. "The Elasticity of Foreign Demand for U.S. Agricultural Products," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 59(4), pages 735-736.
    2. Hirshleifer, Jack, 1971. "The Private and Social Value of Information and the Reward to Inventive Activity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 61(4), pages 561-574, September.
    3. Ellingson, Dennis & Peterson, Willis L., 1981. "The Allocation Of Research Personnel: Administrators' Response To Expected Rates To Return," Staff Papers 14093, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    4. Ballard, Charles L & Shoven, John B & Whalley, John, 1985. "General Equilibrium Computations of the Marginal Welfare Costs of Taxes in the United States," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(1), pages 128-138, March.
    5. Beach, Charles M & MacKinnon, James G, 1978. "A Maximum Likelihood Procedure for Regression with Autocorrelated Errors," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(1), pages 51-58, January.
    6. Browning, Edgar K, 1976. "The Marginal Cost of Public Funds," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 84(2), pages 283-298, April.
    7. Salmon, David C., 1983. "Congruence of Agricultural Research in Indonesia 1974-1978," Bulletins 7475, University of Minnesota, Economic Development Center.
    8. White, Fred C. & Havlicek, Joseph, Jr., 1981. "Interregional Spillover of Agricultural Research Results and Intergovernmental Finance: Some Preliminary Results," Evaluation of Agricultural Research, Proceedings of a Workshop, Minneapolis, MN, May 12-13, 1980, Miscellaneous Publication 8 49019, University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station.
    9. Tweeten, Luther G., 1967. "The Demand for United States Farm Output," Food Research Institute Studies, Stanford University, Food Research Institute, vol. 7(3), pages 1-28.
    10. Erhun Kula, 1984. "Derivation of Social Time Preference Rates for the United States and Canada," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 99(4), pages 873-882.
    11. Stuart, Charles E, 1984. "Welfare Costs per Dollar of Additional Tax Revenue in the United States," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 74(3), pages 352-362, June.
    12. Havlicek, Joseph Jr & White, Fred C., 1983. "Interregional Transfer of Agricultural Research Results: The Case of the Northeast," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 0(Number 2), pages 1-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Horbasz, C. N. & Fox, G. & Brinkman, G. L., 1988. "The Returns to Sheep Research in Canada: 1968-1984," Department of Agricultural Economics and Business 258613, University of Guelph.
    2. Huot, Marie-France & Fox, Glenn & Brinkman, George, 1988. "The Returns to Canadian Federal Swine Research - 1968 to 1984," Department of Agricultural Economics and Business 258612, University of Guelph.
    3. John Freebairn, 1995. "Reconsidering the Marginal Welfare Cost of Taxation," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 71(2), pages 121-131, June.
    4. Ming Chung Chang & Shufen Wu, 2011. "Should Marginal Cost of Public Funds include the Revenue Effect?," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 147(I), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Fox, Glenn, 1985. "Social Rates Of Return To Public Investment In Agricultural Research And The Underinvestment Hypothesis: An Agnostic View," Staff Papers 14054, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    6. Parry, Ian W.H., 1999. "Tax Deductions, Consumption Distortions, and the Marginal Excess Burden of Taxation," Discussion Papers 10801, Resources for the Future.
    7. Kleven, Henrik Jacobsen & Kreiner, Claus Thustrup, 2006. "The marginal cost of public funds: Hours of work versus labor force participation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(10-11), pages 1955-1973, November.
    8. Charles L. Ballard & Don Fullerton, 1992. "Distortionary Taxes and the Provision of Public Goods," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 6(3), pages 117-131, Summer.
    9. Mickaël Beaud & Thierry Blayac & Patrice Bougette & Soufiane Khoudmi & Philippe Mahenc & Stéphane Mussard, 2013. "Estimation du coût d'opportunité des fonds publics pour l'économie française," Working Papers halshs-01077141, HAL.
    10. Qidi Zhang & Leonard F.S. Wang & Yapo Yang, 2020. "Indirect taxation with shadow cost of public funds in mixed oligopoly," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(3), pages 415-425, April.
    11. Hansson, Åsa, 2004. "Taxpayers Responsiveness to Tax Rate Changes and Implications for the Cost of Taxation," Working Papers 2004:5, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    12. Thomas D. Birch, 1987. "Basic Needs: Paternalistic Government Welfare Policy with Distortionary Taxation," Public Finance Review, , vol. 15(3), pages 298-321, July.
    13. Alson, Julian M. & Hurd, Brian R., 1988. "The Hidden Social Costs Of Government Spending In Farm Programs," Working Papers 225823, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    14. Rouillon, Sébastien, 2010. "Optimal law enforcement with costly public funds," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 345-348, December.
    15. Ian Parry, 2002. "Tax Deductions and the Marginal Welfare Cost of Taxation," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 9(5), pages 531-552, September.
    16. Fullerton, Don & Henderson, Yolanda Kodrzycki, 1989. "The Marginal Excess Burden of Different Capital Tax Instruments," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 71(3), pages 435-442, August.
    17. Chris Jones, 2005. "Why the Marginal Social Cost of Funds is not the Shadow Value of Government Revenue," ANU Working Papers in Economics and Econometrics 2005-449, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics.
    18. Zachariah, Oswald E. R. & Fox, Glenn & Brinkman, George L., 1988. "The Returns to Broiler Research in Canada: 1968 to 1984," Department of Agricultural Economics and Business 258611, University of Guelph.
    19. Liqun Liu, 2004. "The Marginal Cost of Funds and the Shadow Prices of Public Sector Inputs and Outputs," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 11(1), pages 17-29, January.
    20. Cecil Bohanon & James McClure, 1986. "Taxes, welfare costs, and public consumption: The case of the unwitting monopsonist," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 235-247, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:umaesp:13360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daumnus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.