IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ukuras/337575.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mechanisation or husbandry? An economist's speculation

Author

Listed:
  • Price, C.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Price, C., 1978. "Mechanisation or husbandry? An economist's speculation," Centre for Agricultural Strategy - Papers and Reports 337575, University of Reading.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ukuras:337575
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/337575/files/cas-con-0009.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin S. Feldstein, 1964. "Net Social Benefit Calculation And The Public Investment Decision," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 114-131.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bell, Frederick W., 1969. "Benefit-Cost Analysis As Applied to Commercial Fisheries Programs," Working Papers 233018, United States Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, Division of Economic Research.
    2. Liqun Liu & Andrew J. Rettenmaier & Thomas R. Saving, 2004. "A Generalized Approach to Multigeneration Project Evaluation," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 71(2), pages 377-396, October.
    3. Colin, Price, 2011. "Optimal rotation with declining discount rate," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 307-318, August.
    4. Liu, Xiaojie & Shen, Jim Huangnan & Deng, Kent, 2016. "A rational path towards a Pareto optimum for reforms of large state-owned enterprise in China, past, present and future," Economic History Working Papers 67019, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    5. Robert J. Brent, 1980. "Distinguishing between Money income and Utility income in Cost-Benefit Analisys," Public Finance Review, , vol. 8(2), pages 131-152, April.
    6. García, Jorge Luis & Heckman, James Joseph, 2022. "Three Criteria for Evaluating Social Programs," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(3), pages 281-286, October.
    7. Price, Colin, 2010. "Low discount rates and insignificant environmental values," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 1895-1903, August.
    8. Liqun Liu, 2005. "The Multi-Period Cost-Benefit Rule with Mobile Capital and Distorted Labor," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 12(2), pages 145-158, March.
    9. Shen, Huangnan & Fang, Lei & Deng, Kent, 2017. "Rise of ‘Red Zaibatsu’ in China: entrenchment and expansion of large state-owned enterprises, 1990-2016," Economic History Working Papers 75214, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    10. Centre for Agricultural Strategy, 1980. "Strategy for the UK forest industry," Centre for Agricultural Strategy - Papers and Reports 337526, University of Reading.
    11. Spencer Bastani, 2023. "The Marginal Cost of Public Funds: A Brief Guide," CESifo Working Paper Series 10322, CESifo.
    12. Liu, Xiaojie & Shen, Jim Huangnan & Deng, Kent, 2022. "Endowment Structure, property rights and reforms of large state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in China: Past, present and future," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 675-692.
    13. Liu, Liqun, 2003. "A marginal cost of funds approach to multi-period public project evaluation: implications for the social discount rate," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(7-8), pages 1707-1718, August.
    14. Liqun Liu & Andrew J. Rettenmaier & Thomas R. Saving, 2005. "Discounting according to Output Type," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 72(1), pages 213-223, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Livestock Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ukuras:337575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dardguk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.