IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pubfin/v8y1980i2p131-152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distinguishing between Money income and Utility income in Cost-Benefit Analisys

Author

Listed:
  • Robert J. Brent

    (University of Essex)

Abstract

To date, the distinction between money income and utility income has been recognized only in an efficiency context. This article argues that it is also srgnificant in an income redistribution context and can be used to identify the form which such redistribution is to take, cash or kind. To illustrate its practical significance, this distinction is shown to underlie the social evaluation of time savings which appear as benefits in many public transport investments. By imputation from past railway closure decisions in the United Kingdom, a value for time twice the conventional evaluation is obtained.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert J. Brent, 1980. "Distinguishing between Money income and Utility income in Cost-Benefit Analisys," Public Finance Review, , vol. 8(2), pages 131-152, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:8:y:1980:i:2:p:131-152
    DOI: 10.1177/109114218000800201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/109114218000800201
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/109114218000800201?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edgar Olsen, 1969. "A normative theory of transfers," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 39-58, March.
    2. Martin S. Feldstein, 1964. "Net Social Benefit Calculation And The Public Investment Decision," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 114-131.
    3. Hochman, Harold M & Rodgers, James D, 1971. "Is Efficiency a Criterion for Judging Redistribution?," Public Finance = Finances publiques, , vol. 26(2), pages 348-360.
    4. Edgar K. Browning, 1975. "The Externality Argument For In‐Kind Transfers: Some Critical Remarks," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 526-544, August.
    5. Browning, Edgar K, 1975. "The Externality Argument for In-Kind Transfers: Some Critical Remarks," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 526-544.
    6. Diamond, P. A. & McFadden, D. L., 1974. "Some uses of the expenditure function in public finance," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 3-21, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert J. Brent, 1984. "Use of Distributional Weights in Cost-Benefit Analysis: a Survey of Schools," Public Finance Review, , vol. 12(2), pages 213-230, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bruno De Borger, 1986. "In-Kind Redistribution and Demand-Oriented Housing Subsidies: Some Micro-Simulation Results," Public Finance Review, , vol. 14(3), pages 235-261, July.
    2. Janet Currie & Firouz Gahvari, 2008. "Transfers in Cash and In-Kind: Theory Meets the Data," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 46(2), pages 333-383, June.
    3. William R. Johnson, 1978. "Substitution in Household Production and the Efficiency of in-Kind Transfers," Public Finance Review, , vol. 6(2), pages 204-210, April.
    4. Walter S. Misiolek & Harold W. Elder, 1987. "Cost-Effective Redistribution: Implications of a Basic Needs Approach to Public Assistance," Public Finance Review, , vol. 15(1), pages 76-97, January.
    5. Gaspar, Ví­tor & Afonso, António, 2006. "Excess burden and the cost of inefficiency in public services provision," Working Paper Series 601, European Central Bank.
    6. Dieckhoener, Caroline & Hecking, Harald, 2012. "Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Curves of the Residential Heating Market – a Microeconomic Approach," EWI Working Papers 2012-16, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI).
    7. Raimondos-Moller, Pascalis & Woodland, Alan D., 2006. "Measuring tax efficiency: A tax optimality index," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(10-11), pages 1903-1922, November.
    8. Laurence J. Kotlikoff & Bernd Raffelhüeschen & Christian D. Hagist, 2009. "How regional differences in taxes and public goods distort life cycle location choices," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 189(2), pages 47-79, June.
    9. Nerlove, Marc & Razin, Assaf & Sadka, Efraim, 1983. "Economic Issues in Population Policy," Foerder Institute for Economic Research Working Papers 275372, Tel-Aviv University > Foerder Institute for Economic Research.
    10. Michael Smart, 2002. "Reforming the Direct–Indirect Tax Mix," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 9(2), pages 143-155, March.
    11. Casey Mulligan & Tomas Philipson, "undated". "Merit Motives and Government Intervention: Public Finance in Reverse," University of Chicago - Population Research Center 2000-03, Chicago - Population Research Center.
    12. Carlos de Miguel & Baltasar Manzano, 2006. "Optimal Oil Taxation in a Small Open Economy," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 9(3), pages 438-454, July.
    13. Liqun Liu & Andrew J. Rettenmaier & Thomas R. Saving, 2004. "A Generalized Approach to Multigeneration Project Evaluation," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 71(2), pages 377-396, October.
    14. Green, Donald & Jacowitz, Karen E. & Kahneman, Daniel & McFadden, Daniel, 1998. "Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingness to pay for public goods," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 85-116, June.
    15. Colin, Price, 2011. "Optimal rotation with declining discount rate," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 307-318, August.
    16. Chris Jones, 2005. "Why the Marginal Social Cost of Funds is not the Shadow Value of Government Revenue," ANU Working Papers in Economics and Econometrics 2005-449, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics.
    17. Laurence Kotlikoff & Felix Kubler & Andrey Polbin & Jeffrey Sachs & Simon Scheidegger, 2021. "Making Carbon Taxation A Generational Win Win," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 62(1), pages 3-46, February.
    18. Liu, Xiaojie & Shen, Jim Huangnan & Deng, Kent, 2016. "A rational path towards a Pareto optimum for reforms of large state-owned enterprise in China, past, present and future," Economic History Working Papers 67019, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    19. V. Kerry Smith, 1986. "Benefit Analysis for Natural Hazards," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(3), pages 325-334, September.
    20. van Soest, A.H.O., 1990. "Essays on micro-econometric models of consumer demand and the labour market," Other publications TiSEM be045d62-a73d-4d7c-a591-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:8:y:1980:i:2:p:131-152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.