IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uhgewp/316973.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cartographie du commerce agricole au sein de la CEDEAO : structure et flux des produits agricoles, obstacles au commerce, lacunes en matière de financement et options politiques.Un projet de recherche en coopération avec la GIZ pour le compte du BMZ

Author

Listed:
  • Kareem, Olayinka Idowu
  • Wieck, Christine

Abstract

Cette étude examine la structure et le flux du commerce agroalimentaire formel et informel au sein de la CEDEAO et évalue les barrières commerciales et les lacunes en matière d'infrastructures financières et qualitatives. Une approche mixte - méthodes qualitatives et quantitatives - est adoptée qui comprend une revue extensive de la littérature, une analyse des données statistiques disponibles sur le commerce formel et informel et les barrières commerciales, une enquête de terrain, des interviews d'experts et des ateliers. Le commerce agroalimentaire intra-CEDEAO reste à un niveau faible, la plupart des produits agroalimentaires échangés n'ayant pas de valeur ajoutée et étant caractérisés par une diversification inadéquate de la base d'exportation. On constate une prépondérance du commerce agroalimentaire informel le long des corridors commerciaux formels et informels. Le bétail, les graines oléagineuses, les graines de coton, les noix, les fèves de cacao, les céréales, le manioc, la pêche, les fruits et les légumes sont les produits agroalimentaires les plus échangés, qui ne bénéficient d'aucune concession de passage ou de facilitation aux frontières malgré le caractère périssable de ces produits. Les flux commerciaux agroalimentaires dans la CEDEAO sont largement entravés par l'hétérogénéité des mesures de politique commerciale dans les États membres. Cela constitue souvent une barrière au commerce et tend à augmenter les coûts commerciaux et les prix des produits de base, limitant ainsi les avantages du commerce régional pour les populations tout en rendant les pays commerçants non compétitifs. Les femmes commerçantes de produits agroalimentaires sont souvent exploitées et harcelées par les fonctionnaires des différentes frontières. De plus, le faible commerce intra-CEDEAO des produits agricoles et alimentaires est dû aux faibles capacités de production, qui sont notamment dues à l'insuffisance des financements, à la mauvaise qualité des infrastructures - douces (inspecteurs formés, numérisation des procédures douanières, certification, etc.) et dures (installations de métrologie, routes, installations portuaires, laboratoires de test et d'inspection, etc.) Le financement du commerce agricole a été identifié comme l'un des principaux obstacles au commerce des produits agricoles dans cette sous-région. Des options politiques stratégiques pour promouvoir le commerce agroalimentaire au sein de la CEDEAO sont fournies.

Suggested Citation

  • Kareem, Olayinka Idowu & Wieck, Christine, 2022. "Cartographie du commerce agricole au sein de la CEDEAO : structure et flux des produits agricoles, obstacles au commerce, lacunes en matière de financement et options politiques.Un projet de recherche," Working Papers 316973, Universitaet Hohenheim, Institute of Agricultural Policy and Agricultural Markets.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uhgewp:316973
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.316973
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/316973/files/HHA32_fr.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.316973?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bouët, Antoine & Cissé, Brahima & Traoré, Fousseini, 2020. "Informal cross-border trade in Africa," IFPRI book chapters, in: Africa agriculture trade monitor 2020, chapter 5, pages 119-148, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Bouet, Antoine & Cosnard, Lionel & Fall, Cheickh Sadibou, 2019. "Africa in global agricultural trade," IFPRI book chapters, in: Africa agriculture trade monitor 2019, chapter 2, pages aatm17-41, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    3. World Bank & World Trade Organization, 2020. "Women and Trade," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 34140.
    4. Do, Quy-Toan & Levchenko, Andrei A. & Raddatz, Claudio, 2016. "Comparative advantage, international trade, and fertility," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 48-66.
    5. Bouët, Antoine & Odjo, Sunday P., 2019. "Africa agriculture trade monitor 2019," IFPRI books, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), number 9780896296909.
    6. Marco Fugazza, 2013. "The Economics Behind Non-Tariff Measures: Theoretical Insights And Empirical Evidence," UNCTAD Blue Series Papers 57, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    7. Lassana Cissokho & Jonathan Haughton & Kossi Makpayo & Abdoulaye Seck, 2013. "Why Is Agricultural Trade within ECOWAS So High?," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 22(1), pages 22-51, January.
    8. Julien Gourdon & Alessandro Nicita, 2013. "A Preliminary Analysis On Newly Collected Data On Non-Tariff Measures," UNCTAD Blue Series Papers 53, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    9. Olayinka Idowu Kareem, 2011. "The European Union’s Trade Policies and Africa’s Exports," World Economics, World Economics, 1 Ivory Square, Plantation Wharf, London, United Kingdom, SW11 3UE, vol. 12(2), pages 49-64, April.
    10. Rostow,W. W., 1991. "The Stages of Economic Growth," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521400701, September.
    11. Rostow,W. W., 1991. "The Stages of Economic Growth," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521409285, September.
    12. Kareem, Olayinka Idowu, 2014. "Product standards and Africa’s agricultural exports," AGRODEP working papers 9, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    13. Fofana, Ismaël & Odjo, Sunday P. & Traoré, Fousseini, 2019. "Gender and trade in Africa: Case study of Niger," IFPRI book chapters, in: 2019 Annual trends and outlook report: Gender equality in rural Africa: From commitments to outcomes, chapter 8, pages ReSAKSS11, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    14. Fofana, Ismael & Odjo, Sunday P. & Traore, Fousseini, 2019. "Gender and trade in Africa: Case study of Niger:," IFPRI discussion papers 1885, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    15. World Bank, 2020. "World Development Report 2020," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 32437.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kareem, Olayinka Idowu & Wieck, Christine, 2022. "Mapping agricultural trade within the ECOWAS: structure and flow of agricultural products, barriers to trade, financing gaps and policy options A research project in cooperation with GIZ on behalf of ," Working Papers 316918, Universitaet Hohenheim, Institute of Agricultural Policy and Agricultural Markets.
    2. Kareem, Olayinka Idowu, 2022. "Fruit safety regulations in the transatlantic region: How are Africa’s exports faring with the regulations?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 886-902.
    3. Kareem, Olayinka Idowu, 2016. "Food safety regulations and fish trade: Evidence from European Union-Africa trade relations," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 18-25.
    4. Simla Tokgoz & Summer Allen & Fahd Majeed & Bas Paris & Olajide Adeola & Evans Osabuohien, 2020. "Distortions to agricultural incentives: Evidence from Nigerian value chains," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(3), pages 1027-1045, August.
    5. Sarah Karinge, 2013. "The Elite Factor in Sub-Saharan Africa’s Development," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 29(4), pages 435-455, December.
    6. Xie, Ronghui & Teo, Thompson S.H., 2022. "Green technology innovation, environmental externality, and the cleaner upgrading of industrial structure in China — Considering the moderating effect of environmental regulation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    7. Dosi, Giovanni & Riccio, Federico & Virgillito, Maria Enrica, 2021. "Varieties of deindustrialization and patterns of diversification: why microchips are not potato chips," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 182-202.
    8. Zilibotti, Fabrizio, 1995. "A Rostovian model of endogenous growth and underdevelopment traps," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 1569-1602, October.
    9. James Rising, 2014. "Creating the Commons: Fisheries and the World Bank," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(1), pages 75-95.
    10. Olayinka Idowu Kareem, 2014. "The European Union Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures and Africa’s Exports," RSCAS Working Papers 2014/98, European University Institute.
    11. Evan, Tomáš & Holý, Vladimír, 2021. "Economic conditions for innovation: Private vs. public sector," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    12. Bakari Mohamed El-Kamel, 2015. "Sustainable Development in a Global Context: A Success or a Nuisance?," New Global Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 27-56, April.
    13. Upalat Korwatanasakul & Youngmin Baek, 2021. "The Effect of Non-Tariff Measures on Global Value Chain Participation," Global Economic Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 193-212, July.
    14. Olayinka Idowu Kareem, 2016. "The High-Value Commodity Export Effects of Standards in Africa," The International Trade Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 237-259, May.
    15. Tom'av{s} Evan & Vladim'ir Hol'y, 2020. "Economic Conditions for Innovation: Private vs. Public Sector," Papers 2004.07814, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2020.
    16. Ajayi, Temitope Abraham, 2021. "Democratic Government, Corruption Control, and Economic Development: Evidence from Nigeria with Cointegration Approach," MPRA Paper 110090, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Sameer Kumar & Jariah Mohd. Jan, 2014. "Research collaboration networks of two OIC nations: comparative study between Turkey and Malaysia in the field of ‘Energy Fuels’, 2009–2011," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(1), pages 387-414, January.
    18. John C. Beghin & Bo Xiong, 2016. "Economic Effects of Standard-Like Nontariff Measures: Analytical and Methodological Dimensions," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 16-wp569, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    19. Eleonora Sofilda & Muhammad Zilal Hamzah, 2015. "Government Spending Contributions on per Capita Income and its Effect toward the Human Development Index (Comparative Study between Western Indonesia and Central & East Indonesia)," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 6(3), pages 43-49.
    20. Amina Lahrèche-Revil, 1999. "Taux de change réel et croissance : Perspectives pour une zone euro en Méditerranée," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 52(2), pages 117-132.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uhgewp:316973. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwhohde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.