IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ufstmd/28066.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Econometric Estimation Of The Demand For Meat In South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Taljaard, Pieter R.

Abstract

In this study the demand relations for meat in South Africa are estimated and interpreted. Two demand model specifications, namely the Rotterdam and Linearized Almost Ideal Demand System (LA/AIDS), were estimated and tested in order to determine which model provide the best fit for South African meat data. Tests for separability included an F and Likelihood ratio version. Both tests rejected the null hypothesis of weak separability between meat, eggs and milk as protein sources, indicating that the demand model for meat products should be estimated separately from eggs and milk. Consequently, separability tests between the four meat products fail to reject the null hypothesis, confirming that the four meat products should be modelled together. According to the Hausman exogeneity test, the expenditure term is exogenous. As a result, a Restricted Seemingly Unrelated Regression (RSUR) was used to estimate both models. Annual time series data from 1970 to 2000 were used. Both models were estimated in first differenced format, whereafter the estimated parameters were used to calculate compensated, uncompensated and expenditure elasticities. In a non-nested test, the Saragan's and Vuong's likelihood criterion, selected the LA/AIDS model. In terms of expected sign and statistical significance of the elasticities, the LA/AIDS also proved to be more suitable for South African meat data. Although the magnitudes of most own price and cross-price elasticities were significantly lower than previous estimates of demand relations for meat in South Africa, several reasons, including estimation techniques and time gaps, were offered as explanations for these differences. The uncompensated own price elasticity for beef (-0.7504) is the largest in absolute terms, followed by mutton (-0.4678), pork (-0.36972) and chicken (-0.3502). In terms of the compensated own price elasticities, which contain only the pure price effect, pork (-0.30592) was the most elastic, followed by mutton (-0.27713), chicken (-0.1939) and beef (-0.16111). The expenditure elasticities of beef (1.243) and mutton (1.181) are greater than one, indicating that beef and mutton are luxury goods in South Africa. The expenditure elasticity for beef is the most elastic; indicating that South African consumers as a whole, will increase their beef consumption as the total expenditure on meat products increase.

Suggested Citation

  • Taljaard, Pieter R., 2003. "Econometric Estimation Of The Demand For Meat In South Africa," Master's Degree Theses 28066, University of the Free State, Department of Agricultural Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ufstmd:28066
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.28066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/28066/files/mp03ta01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.28066?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Van Zyl & A.F. Van Heerden & J.A. Groenewald & F.L. Vivier, 1992. "Meat Price Relationships in South Africa," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 60(2), pages 112-121, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Grove, Bennie & Taljaard, Pieter R. & Cloete, Philip C., 2007. "A Stochastic Budgeting Analysis of Three Alternative Scenarios to Convert from Beef-Cattle Farming to Game Ranching," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 46(4), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Oyewumi, Olubukola Ayodeju, 2005. "Modeling tariff rate quotas in the South African livestock industry," Master's Degree Theses 28064, University of the Free State, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    3. Olorunfemi Sola, 2013. "Demand for food in Ondo state, Nigeria: Using quadratic almost ideal demand system," E3 Journal of Business Management and Economics., E3 Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 001-019.
    4. Oyewumi, Olubukola Ayodeju & Jooste, Andre & Britz, Wolfgang & van Schalkwyk, Herman D., 2007. "Tariff and Tariff Rate Quota Liberalization in the South African Livestock Industry: Approaches to Welfare Measurement," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 46(1), pages 1-22, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sartorius von Bach, Helmke & van Zyl, Johan & Vivier, Leon & Millard, Solly, 1992. "Price Leadership In The South African Carbohydrate Market," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 31(4), December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ufstmd:28066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dauovza.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.