IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ufliwp/237436.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Sugar: The Free Trade Myth and the Reality of European Subsidies

Author

Listed:
  • Schmitz, Andrew

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Schmitz, Andrew, 1995. "Sugar: The Free Trade Myth and the Reality of European Subsidies," International Working Paper Series 237436, University of Florida, Food and Resource Economics Department.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ufliwp:237436
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.237436
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/237436/files/ufl-iwp-95-20.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.237436?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roningen, Vernon O. & Dixit, Praveen M., 1989. "Economic Implications Of Agricultural Policy Reforms In Industrial Market Economies," Staff Reports 278843, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. David G. Abler, 1989. "Vote Trading on Farm Legislation in the U.S. House," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(3), pages 583-591.
    3. Lopez, Rigoberto A. & Sachtler, Kay G., 1989. "Politico-Economic Analysis of the US Sugar Programme," 1989 Occasional Paper Series No. 5 197684, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Usa Ers, 1984. "Situation and Outlook," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 0(1), March.
    5. Lord, Ron, 1995. "Sugar: Background for 1995 Farm Legislation," Agricultural Economic Reports 262017, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Wong, Gordon & Sturgiss, Robert & Borrell, Brent, 1989. "The Economic Consequences of International Sugar Trade Reform," Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES) Archive 316166, Australian Government, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences.
    7. Gwo-Jiun M. Leu & Andrew Schmitz & Ronald D. Knutson, 1987. "Gains and Losses of Sugar Program Policy Options," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(3), pages 591-602.
    8. Keith E. Maskus, 1989. "Large Costs and Small Benefits of the American Sugar Programme," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), pages 85-104, March.
    9. Usda Ers, 1990. "In the News," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 13(2), June.
    10. Gary S. Becker, 1983. "A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 98(3), pages 371-400.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Polopolus, Leo C., 1996. "World Sugar Markets and U.S. Sugar Policy," Staff Paper Series 239305, University of Florida, Food and Resource Economics Department.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schmitz, Andrew & Vercammen, James, 1990. "Trade Liberalization in the World Sugar Market: Playing on a Level Field?," CUDARE Working Papers 198574, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    2. Won W. Koo, 2002. "Alternative U.S. and EU Sugar Trade Liberalization Policies and their Implications," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 24(2), pages 336-352.
    3. Jonathan Brooks, 1996. "Agricultural Policies In Oecd Countries: What Can We Learn From Political Economy Models?," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1‐4), pages 366-389, January.
    4. Bullock, D. S. & Salhofer, K., 1998. "Measuring the social costs of suboptimal combinations of policy instruments: A general framework and an example," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 249-259, May.
    5. Christian, Douglas & Schmitz, Andrew, 1992. "The Adoption of Welfare-Reducing Policies: An Alternative Explanation from U.S. Agriculture," CUDARE Working Papers 198607, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    6. Lord, Ron & Barry, Robert D., 1990. "The World Sugar Market--Government Intervention and Multilateral Policy Reform," Staff Reports 278353, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Demont, Matty & Tollens, Eric, 2001. "Welfare Effects Of Transgenic Sugarbeets In The European Union: A Theoretical Ex-Ante Framework," Working Papers 31852, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centre for Agricultural and Food Economics.
    8. Demont, Matty & Tollens, Eric, 2001. "Ex-Ante Evaluation Of The Economic Impact Of Agricultural Biotechnology In The European Union: The Case Of Transgenic Sugarbeets," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20631, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Gordon C. Rausser, 1992. "Predatory versus Productive Government: The Case of U.S. Agricultural Policies," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 6(3), pages 133-157, Summer.
    10. Julian Alston & Colin Carter, 1991. "Causes And Consequences Of Farm Policy," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 9(1), pages 107-121, January.
    11. David S. Bullock & Klaus Salhofer & Jukka Kola, 1999. "The Normative Analysis of Agricultural Policy: A General Framework and Review," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3), pages 512-535, September.
    12. Lopez, Rigoberto A., 1991. "Determinants Of Philippine Sugar Pricing Decisions," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271243, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    13. Poonyth, Daneswar & Westhoff, Patrick & Womack, Abner & Adams, Gary, 2000. "Impacts of WTO restrictions on subsidized EU sugar exports," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 22(3), pages 233-245, April.
    14. Demont, Matty & Tollens, Eric, 2002. "Impact Of Agricultural Biotechnology In The European Union'S Sugar Industry," Working Papers 31854, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centre for Agricultural and Food Economics.
    15. Muth, Mary K & Rucker, Randal R & Thurman, Walter N & Chuang, Ching-Ta, 2003. "The Fable of the Bees Revisited: Causes and Consequences of the U.S. Honey Program," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 46(2), pages 479-516, October.
    16. Demont, Matty & Tollens, Eric, "undated". "When Modern Agricultural (BIO)Technologies Meet Obsolete Trade PoliciesL The Case of the European Union's Sugar Industry," 2002 Conference (46th), February 13-15, 2002, Canberra, Australia 125079, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    17. Persson, Torsten & Tabellini, Guido, 2002. "Political economics and public finance," Handbook of Public Economics, in: A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (ed.), Handbook of Public Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 24, pages 1549-1659, Elsevier.
    18. Rodrigo M. S. Moita & Claudio Paiva, 2013. "Political Price Cycles in Regulated Industries: Theory and Evidence," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 5(1), pages 94-121, February.
    19. Anders Gustafsson, 2019. "Busy doing nothing: why politicians implement inefficient policies," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 282-299, September.
    20. Bryan Caplan & Edward Stringham, 2005. "Mises, bastiat, public opinion, and public choice," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 79-105.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ufliwp:237436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fruflus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.