IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerssr/278239.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economics of Controlling Sediment from Irrigation: An Idaho Example

Author

Listed:
  • Magleby, Richard
  • Kasal, James
  • Walker, David
  • Gum, Russell

Abstract

The Rock Creek, ID, project of the experimental Rural Clean Water Program may improve recreational fishing and hunting, reduce costs of removing sediment from irrigation ditches, and slightly lower the cost of hydroelectric plant maintenance. The project is also providing cost, tax, and long-term yield benefits to farmers. Total economic benefits, including onfarm benefits, may exceed costs, but water quality benefits alone may not unless substantial additional implementation of conservation tillage occurs among program participants. Conservation tillage is the most costeffective practice, while improved irrigation structures are the least cost effective.

Suggested Citation

  • Magleby, Richard & Kasal, James & Walker, David & Gum, Russell, 1989. "Economics of Controlling Sediment from Irrigation: An Idaho Example," Staff Reports 278239, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278239
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.278239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/278239/files/ers-report-412.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.278239?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David J. Walker, 1982. "A Damage Function to Evaluate Erosion Control Economics," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 64(4), pages 690-698.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Prato, Tony & Wu, Shunxiang, 1991. "Soil Conservation Benefits of Sustainable Cropping Systems," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271072, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Franco, Juan Agustin & Calatrava-Requena, Javier, 2008. "Adoption and diffusion of no tillage practices in Southern Spain olive groves," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44014, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Pagoulatos, Angelos & Debertin, David L. & Sjarkowi, Fachrurrozie, 1987. "Soil Erosion and Yield Uncertainty in the Soil Conservation Decision," Agricultural Economics Research Reports 140066, University of Kentucky, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    3. Lakshminarayan, P. G. & Atwood, J. D. & Johnson, Stanley R. & Sposito, V. A., 1991. "Compromise Solution for Economic-Environmental Decisions in Agriculture," Staff General Research Papers Archive 375, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    4. Prato, Tony, 1987. "Economic Feasibility Of Conservation Tillage In The Palouse With Stochastic Erosion Rates And Yields," A.E. Research Series 305060, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    5. Pande, V.C. & Kurothe, R.S. & Singh, H.B. & Tiwari, S.P. & Kumar, Gopal & Rao, B.K. & Vishwakarma, A.K. & Bagdi, G.L., 2013. "Economic Assessment of Soil Erosion Damage on Smallholder Farms in Marginal Lands of Mahi Ravines in Gujarat," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 26(1), June.
    6. Amrita Chatterjee & Arpita Ghose, 2016. "A dynamic economic model of soil conservation and drought tolerance involving genetically modified crops," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 18(1), pages 40-66, October.
    7. Wu, Shunxiang & Walker, David J. & Brusven, Merlyn A., 1997. "Economic And Environmental Impacts Of Planting Flexibility And Conservation 1990 Farm Bills For Future Farm Legislation," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 26(2), pages 1-13, October.
    8. Amrita Chatterjee & Arpita Ghose, 2015. "A Dynamic Economic Model of Soil Conservation Involving Genetically Modified Crop," Working Papers 2015-096, Madras School of Economics,Chennai,India.
    9. Ian A. COXHEAD, 1995. "Economic Modeling Of Land Degradation In Developing Countries," Staff Papers 385, University of Wisconsin Madison, AAE, revised May 1996.
    10. Christensen, Lee A. & McElyea, David E., 1986. "Towards a General Method of Estimating Productivity-Soil Depth Response Relationships," 1986 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Reno, Nevada 278502, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Alexander, Robert R. & English, Burton C., 1992. "Modeling Soil Erosion Control Policy: A Multi-Level Dynamic Analysis," 1992 Annual Meeting, August 9-12, Baltimore, Maryland 271375, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    12. Bailey, DeeVon & Helms, Gary L., 1985. "An Analysis Of Alternative Tillage Practices On Non-Irrigated Grain Farms: A Whole-Farm Simulation Approach," 1985 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Ames, Iowa 278648, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    13. Saliba, B. Colby, 1985. "Soil Productivity And Farmers' Erosion Control Incentives--A Dynamic Modeling Approach," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(2), pages 1-11, December.
    14. Jaruntorn Boonyanuphap, 2013. "Cost-benefit analysis of vetiver system-based rehabilitation measures for landslide-damaged mountainous agricultural lands in the lower Northern Thailand," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(1), pages 599-629, October.
    15. Williams, Jeffery R. & Tanaka, Donald L. & Herbel, Kevin L., 1993. "Farm Value Of Topsoil In Spring Wheat Production," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 18(1), pages 1-14, July.
    16. Blackman, Allen & Mathis, Mitchell & Nelson, Peter, 2001. "The Greening of Development Economics: A Survey," Discussion Papers 10662, Resources for the Future.
    17. Amrita Chatterjee & Arpita Ghose, 2015. "A Dynamic Economic Model of Soil Conservation Involving Genetically Modified Crop," Working Papers id:6623, eSocialSciences.
    18. Mullen, John D., 2001. "An Economic Persective On Land Degradation Issues," Research Reports 27999, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.
    19. Mahé, Louis-Pascal & Rainelli, Pierre, 1987. "Impact des pratiques et des politiques agricoles sur l'environnement," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 4.
    20. Fox, Glenn & Weersink, Alfons & Sarwar, Ghulam & Duff, Scott & Deen, Bill, 1991. "Comparative Economics Of Alternative Agricultural Production Systems: A Review," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.