IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerssr/277678.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Government Regulation And Policies Affecting The U.S. Turkey Industry: Agencies And Cost Impacts

Author

Listed:
  • Jones, Harold B., Jr.

Abstract

A wide variety of Government regulations and policies influence the turkey industry. This report describes the major regulatory agencies and policies affecting the industry and assesses their relative cost impacts on various sectors of the industry. Regulatory activity is classified into three types: economic regulation; environmental, health, and safety regulation; and social regulation. At least 19 different Federal agencies affect the turkey industry. The combined effects of these regulatory laws and programs contributed an estimated 9.75 + 1.82 cents per pound (ready-to-cook weight) to the cost of producing and marketing turkeys in the early eighties. Economic regulation accounted for 3 cents per pound; environmental, health, and safety regulation 2.6 cents per pound; and social regulation 4.1 cents per pound. However, regulatory costs could be expected to range from 7.9 to 11.6 cents per pound, with even greater variations from yearly changes in policies and programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jones, Harold B., Jr., 1985. "Government Regulation And Policies Affecting The U.S. Turkey Industry: Agencies And Cost Impacts," Staff Reports 277678, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:277678
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.277678
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/277678/files/ers-report-174.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.277678?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hutchinson, T. Q., 1983. "Implications Of The Motor Carrier Act Of 1980," Staff Reports 276783, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Roberts, Tanya, 1983. "Benefit Analysis of Selected Slaughterhouse Meat Inspection Practices," Working Papers 202996, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Food System Research Group.
    3. Rasmussen, Wayne D. & Baker, Gladys L., 1979. "Price-Support and Adjustment Programs from 1933 through 1978: A Short History," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309232, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Salathe, Larry E. & Price, J. Michael & Gadson, Kenneth E., 1982. "The Food and Agricultural Policy Simulator," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 34(2), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Thomas Mann & Arnold Paulsen, 1976. "Economic Impact of Restricting Feed Additives in Livestock and Poultry Production," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 58(1), pages 47-53.
    6. Wiser, Vivian D., 1974. "Protecting American Agriculture: Inspection and Quarantine of Imported Plants and Animals," Agricultural Economic Reports 307512, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Allen, Joyce E., 1984. "Food Programs Grow Slowly From 1979 to 1983," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 0(1), September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hoffman, Linwood A. & Livezey, Janet, 1987. "The U.S. Oats Industry," Agricultural Economic Reports 305462, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Hoffman, Linwood A. & Sronce, Philip W., 1987. "Oats Imports, The U.S. Market, And Government Programs," Staff Reports 277951, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Chen, Dean T. & Ito, Shoichi, 1989. "Modeling Supply Response for Rice Program Analysis: An Application of Implicit Revenue Switching Functions," Staff Reports 257924, Texas A&M University, Agricultural and Food Policy Center.
    4. Longen, Kathryn A. & Claffey, Barbara A., 1981. "The Food Stamp Program as a Categorical Grant: Impact on Participation and Costs," 1981 Annual Meeting, July 26-29, Clemson, South Carolina 279330, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Gardiner, Walter H. & Dixit, Praveen M, 1987. "Price Elasticity of Export Demand: Concepts and Estimates," Foreign Agricultural Economic Report (FAER) 305286, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Caswell, Julie A., 1988. "Federal and State Regulations of Food Product Safety and Quality: A Selected, Partially Annotated Bibliography," Miscellaneous Publications 320010, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Devadoss, S. & Araji, A. A., 1993. "Impacts 0F Breeding And Crop Management Research In Classes Of Wheat On Economic Returns And Exports," A.E. Research Series 305100, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    8. Ribaudo, Marc & Heimlich, Ralph E. & Peters, Mark, 1998. "Nitrogen Sources And Gulf Hypoxia: Potential For Point-Nonpoint Trading," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20796, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Mathews, Kenneth H., Jr., 2001. "Antimicrobial Drug Use And Veterinary Costs In U.S. Livestock Production," Agricultural Information Bulletins 33695, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Tilley, Daniel S., 1980. "Partial Systems Of Demand Functions," 1980 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 278915, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Langley, James A. & Price, J. Michael, 1985. "Implications of Alternative Moving Average Loan Rates," Agricultural Economic Reports 307994, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    12. Jayson L. Lusk & F. Bailey Norwood & J. Ross Pruitt, 2006. "Consumer Demand for a Ban on Antibiotic Drug Use in Pork Production," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 88(4), pages 1015-1033.
    13. Allen, Joyce E. & Newton, Doris Epson, 1986. "Existing Food Policies And Their Relationship To Hunger And Nutrition," 1986 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Reno, Nevada 278490, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    14. Westcott, Paul C. & Hull, David B., 1985. "A Quarterly Forecasting Model for U.S. Agriculture," Technical Bulletins 156815, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    15. Jane Adams, 1995. "Individualism, efficiency, and domesticity: Ideological aspects of the exploitation of farm families and farm women," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 12(4), pages 2-17, September.
    16. Zellner, James A., 1985. "Direct Payments And Acreage Reduction: An Estimate Of Program Induced Export Subsidies And Taxes," 1985 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Ames, Iowa 278618, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    17. Webb, Shwu-Eng H. & Kuchler, Fred, 1984. "Models For Evaluating Economic Impacts Of Policy Changes: A Comparison," Staff Reports 276832, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    18. Robinson, Sherman & Kilkenny, Maureen & Adelman, Irma, 1988. "The Effect of Trade Liberalization in Agriculture on the U.S. Economy to 1991," CUDARE Working Papers 198475, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    19. Ribaudo, Marc O. & Colacicco, Daniel & Langner, Linda L. & Piper, Steven & Schaible, Glenn D., 1990. "Natural Resources and Users Benefit from the Conservation Reserve Program," Agricultural Economic Reports 308085, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    20. Bailey, Kenneth W., 2000. "Evaluating The Economic Impacts Of Regional Milk Pricing Authorities: The Case Of Dairy Compacts," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 29(2), pages 1-12, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:277678. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.