IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersib/290027.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

U.S. Produce Growers’ Decision making Under Evolving Food Safety Standards

Author

Listed:
  • Astill, Gregory
  • Minor, Travis
  • Thornsbury, Suzanne
  • Calvin, Linda

Abstract

U.S. produce growers have faced increased demand for implementing additional food safety practices, prompted by a series of high-profile foodborne illness outbreaks. This report summarizes a series of open-ended discussions with produce growers and reveals the nuanced reasoning behind growers’ actions in response to evolving food safety standards in a complex market. Growers of five commodities in six regions reveal the long history of food safety standards in the industry, including voluntarily implemented standards developed by themselves, commodity organizations, and government agencies as well as those required by some commercial buyers and some States. Growers most confident in their ability to adapt to new food safety regulations—like the “Produce Rule” in the Federal 2011 Food Safety Modernization Act—had two key characteristics in common: a background and culture of food safety at their company and a well-developed food safety information network. Growers agreed that the adoption of food safety standards have been driven largely by commercial buyer requirements. Highly competitive markets force growers to weigh the hard-to-quantify benefits of risk-reducing practices against their significant costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Astill, Gregory & Minor, Travis & Thornsbury, Suzanne & Calvin, Linda, 2019. "U.S. Produce Growers’ Decision making Under Evolving Food Safety Standards," Economic Information Bulletin 290027, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersib:290027
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.290027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/290027/files/EIB210.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.290027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Todd M Schmit & Gretchen L Wall & Elizabeth J Newbold & Elizabeth A Bihn, 2020. "Assessing the costs and returns of on-farm food safety improvements: A survey of Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) training participants," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Agricultural and Food Policy; Farm Management; Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety; Production Economics;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersib:290027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.