IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uamsmr/311300.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Nonfat Dry Milk Packaged for Household Use: Marketing Practices and Costs of Manufacture and Distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Purcell, Margaret R.

Abstract

Excerpts from the report Introduction: Sale of nonfat dry milk in retail packages is a relatively recent innovation in dairy marketing. Although nonfat dry milk was available to civilian consumers in the early years of World War II, and was widely used by the armed forces and by civilian populations abroad, it was not until well after the war's end that quality and ease of reconstitution were such that the product was generally acceptable to the American housewife. Since 1948 sales of nonfat dry milk for home use have spiraled upward. From a little over 2 million pounds in 1948, sales rose to 30 million pounds in 1950, and to an estimated 169 million pounds in 1958. Despite rapid growth, sales of nonfat dry milk for home use accounted for only about one-fifth of total domestic nongovernment sales of nonfat dry milk for food use in 1958. Sales for home use in 1958 were at the rate of less than 1 pound per capita out of a total use per capita of over 5 pounds, low in comparison with that for some other dairy products—12.6 pounds of evaporated milk per capita, 8.5 pounds of butter, and 17.6 pounds of ice cream, for example. The purpose of this report, therefore, is to provide information concerning nonfat dry milk produced for home use: The cost of manufacture, the agencies involved in marketing the product, the functions they perform and the marketing practices they follow, the cost of their services, and the farm-to-retail price spread or marketing margin.

Suggested Citation

  • Purcell, Margaret R., 1960. "Nonfat Dry Milk Packaged for Household Use: Marketing Practices and Costs of Manufacture and Distribution," Marketing Research Reports 311300, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:311300
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.311300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/311300/files/mrr403.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.311300?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herrmann, Louis F. & Anderson, Elsie D. & Bele, Frank A., 1954. "Estimating the Solids-Not-Fat Content of Milk," Marketing Research Reports 310024, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
    2. Snitzler, James R., 1956. "Improving the Truck Delivery Operations of a Wholesale Grocer: A Case Study," Marketing Research Reports 310279, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
    3. Mathis, Anthony G. & Anderson, Elsie D., 1956. "Yield of Nonfat Dry Milk Solids from a Unit of Milk," Marketing Research Reports 310278, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Moede, Herbert H., 1972. "Cost of Instantizing Nonfat Dry Milk," Marketing Research Reports 313712, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vial, Edmund E., 1972. "Prices and Consumption of Dairy Products with Price Supports and Milk Orders," Agricultural Economic Reports 307470, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uamsmr:311300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/amsgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.