IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/332919.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Modeling Trade in Services: Multiple Modes, Barriers to Trade, and Data Limitations

Author

Listed:
  • Barbe, Andre
  • Chambers, Art
  • Khachaturian, Tamar
  • Riker, David

Abstract

In 2015, international trade in services reached 13 percent of world GDP, according to the World Bank. Nonetheless, this trade is impeded by policy barriers that restrict foreign entry, the movement of people, competition, or regulatory transparency. It is challenging to quantify the impact of these barriers to international trade in services. There is very limited information on the value of these trade flows or the size of the barriers that impede them. In addition, the international provision of services occurs through multiple and inter-connected modes of delivery which can be complementary or competing. Finally, barriers to trade in services are complex and difficult to measure and compare across countries. Our research captures some of these complexities of international trade in services and overcomes some of the data challenges. We develop a model of trade in services that includes firm heterogeneity and multiple modes of delivery, including cross-border trade and foreign affiliate transactions. We then use the model to estimate how trade flows and prices would change if the European Union reduced barriers to non-EU providers of services by 50 percent. We find that this liberalization would increase the value of cross-border imports into the EU countries and foreign affiliate purchases in the EU countries by about 25 percent. However, it would only decrease the sales of domestic producers by 0.4 to 6.1 percent, and reduce overall prices of the services in the EU countries by 0.1 to 1.2 percent.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbe, Andre & Chambers, Art & Khachaturian, Tamar & Riker, David, 2017. "Modeling Trade in Services: Multiple Modes, Barriers to Trade, and Data Limitations," Conference papers 332919, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/332919/files/8705.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. di Giovanni, Julian & Levchenko, Andrei A. & Rancière, Romain, 2011. "Power laws in firm size and openness to trade: Measurement and implications," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 42-52, September.
    2. Zhai, Fan, 2008. "Armington Meets Melitz: Introducing Firm Heterogeneity in a Global CGE Model of Trade," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 23, pages 575-604.
    3. Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås & Massimo Geloso Grosso & Frédéric Gonzales & Iza Lejárraga & Sébastien Miroudot & Asako Ueno & Dorothée Rouzet, 2014. "Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI): Computer and Related Services," OECD Trade Policy Papers 169, OECD Publishing.
    4. Dorothée Rouzet & Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås & Frédéric Gonzales & Massimo Geloso Grosso & Iza Lejárraga & Sébastien Miroudot & Asako Ueno, 2014. "Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI): Financial Services," OECD Trade Policy Papers 175, OECD Publishing.
    5. Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås & Iza Lejárraga & Sébastien Miroudot & Frédéric Gonzales & Massimo Geloso Grosso & Dorothée Rouzet & Asako Ueno, 2014. "Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI): Audio-visual Services," OECD Trade Policy Papers 174, OECD Publishing.
    6. Massimo Geloso Grosso & Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås & Frédéric Gonzales & Iza Lejárraga & Sébastien Miroudot & Asako Ueno & Dorothée Rouzet, 2014. "Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI): Legal and Accounting Services," OECD Trade Policy Papers 171, OECD Publishing.
    7. Massimo Geloso Grosso & Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås & Asako Ueno & Frédéric Gonzales & Iza Lejárraga & Sébastien Miroudot & Dorothée Rouzet, 2014. "Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI): Transport and Courier Services," OECD Trade Policy Papers 176, OECD Publishing.
    8. Massimo Geloso Grosso & Iza Lejárraga & Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås & Frédéric Gonzales & Sébastien Miroudot & Asako Ueno & Dorothée Rouzet, 2014. "Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI): Construction, Architecture and Engineering Services," OECD Trade Policy Papers 170, OECD Publishing.
    9. Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås & Massimo Geloso Grosso & Frédéric Gonzales & Iza Lejárraga & Molly Lesher & Sébastien Miroudot & Asako Ueno & Dorothée Rouzet, 2014. "Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI): Telecommunication Services," OECD Trade Policy Papers 172, OECD Publishing.
    10. Asako Ueno & Massimo Geloso Grosso & Iza Lejárraga & Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås & Sébastien Miroudot & Frédéric Gonzales & Dorothée Rouzet, 2014. "Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI): Distribution Services," OECD Trade Policy Papers 173, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zongo, Amara, 2020. "The Impact of Services Trade Restrictiveness on Food Trade," MPRA Paper 101658, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Zongo, Amara, 2021. "The impact of services trade restrictiveness on food trade," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 71-94.
    3. Masood, Maria, 2019. "New evidence on income and the geographical distribution of imports: The case of audiovisuals," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 717-734.
    4. Reto Föllmi & Angela Fuest & Philipp an de Meulen & Martin Micheli & Torsten Schmidt & Lina Zwick, 2018. "Openness and productivity of the Swiss economy," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, Springer;Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics, vol. 154(1), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Nilsson, Lars, 2019. "Reflections on the economic modelling of free trade agreements," DG TRADE Chief Economist Notes 2019-2, Directorate General for Trade, European Commission.
    6. Eddy Bekkers & Joseph Francois, 2018. "A Parsimonious Approach to Incorporate Firm Heterogeneity in CGE-Models," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 3(2), pages 1-68, December.
    7. Ahmad, Saad & Akgul, Zeynep, 2018. "Using Power Laws to Identify the Structural Parameters of Trade Models with Firm Heterogeneity," Conference papers 332993, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    8. Akgul, Zeynep & Villoria, Nelson & Hertel, Thomas, 2015. "Theoretically-Consistent Parameterization of a Multi-sector Global Model with Heterogeneous Firms," Conference papers 332604, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    9. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/21q7rlmakq8ca9c6o2imhini9d is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Petra Štamfestová & Lukáš Sobíšek & Jiří Hnilica, 2023. "Firm Size Distribution in the Central European Context," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(5), pages 151-175.
    11. Yuko Imura, 2023. "Reassessing Trade Barriers with Global Production Networks," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 51, pages 77-116, December.
    12. Heinrich, Torsten & Yang, Jangho & Dai, Shuanping, 2020. "Growth, development, and structural change at the firm-level: The example of the PR China," MPRA Paper 105011, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Pupato, Germán, 2017. "Performance pay, trade and inequality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 478-504.
    14. Fugazza, Marco & Maur, Jean-Christophe, 2008. "Non-tariff barriers in CGE models: How useful for policy?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 475-490.
    15. Cassey Lee, . "The Exporting and Productivity Nexus: Does Firm Size Matter?," Chapters, in: Chin Hee Hahn & Dionisius A. Narjoko (ed.), Globalization and Performance of Small and Large Firms, chapter 8, pages VIII-1 - , Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    16. Roberto Roson & Kazuhiko Oyamada, 2014. "Modeling Firm Heterogeneity in International Trade: Do Structural Effects Matter?," IEFE Working Papers 70, IEFE, Center for Research on Energy and Environmental Economics and Policy, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
    17. Erwin Corong & Thomas Hertel & Robert McDougall & Marinos Tsigas & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, 2017. "The Standard GTAP Model, version 7," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 2(1), pages 1-119, June.
    18. Itakura, Ken & Oyamada, Kazuhiko, 2014. "Examining Trade Response of Armington-Krugman-Melitz Encompassing Module in a CGE Model," Conference papers 332513, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    19. Joseph S. Shapiro & Reed Walker, 2018. "Why Is Pollution from US Manufacturing Declining? The Roles of Environmental Regulation, Productivity, and Trade," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(12), pages 3814-3854, December.
    20. von Graevenitz, Kathrine & Rottner, Elisa & Richter, Philipp M., 2023. "Is Germany becoming the European pollution haven?," ZEW Discussion Papers 23-069, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    21. Zhai, Fan, 2010. "The Benefits of Regional Infrastructure Investment in Asia: A Quantitative Exploration," ADBI Working Papers 223, Asian Development Bank Institute.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Relations/Trade;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332919. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.