IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/332822.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Assessment of Turkish Energy Sector Development under the Paris Agreement Goals using a CGE Model with Detailed Representation of Power Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Kat, Bora
  • Paltsev, Sergey
  • Yuan, Mei

Abstract

Heavy reliance on imported energy and fossil-intensive energy generation are substantial challenges that contribute to the economic problems that Turkey currently faces. Most of the researchers who assess the economic impacts of energy and environmental policies in Turkey use a general equilibrium approach. The models developed for this purpose thus far including assessing the targets that Turkey has submitted for the Paris Agreement employ an aggregated power sector representation, which does not capture the technological details. Given the importance of power sector to a successful climate policy, we develop an integrated computable general equilibrium (CGE) model of Turkish economy (TR-EDGE) that combines macroeconomic representation of the non-electric sectors and detailed representation of the power sector where disaggregation of Turkish power sector in a CGE framework is the first attempt. We assess the compliance cost of commitments under several scenarios. First, a reference scenario (BAU) reflecting current official plans including two nuclear power plants to be commissioned until 2030 is defined and calibrated in accordance with medium-term expectations. This scenario also includes the subsidy scheme for renewables which was revised after 2010. Then, we define another scenario in which no nuclear power technology is allowed (NoN). Finally, a scenario comprising the analysis of a national emission trading scheme (TrEm) is proposed. Results indicate that the price per ton of CO2e emission to attain a 21% reduction in GHG emissions (in 2030 as pledged in the submission to the Paris Agreement) compared to BAU level is $51.46 under BAU+TrEm in 2030, while it is $67.90 under NoN+TrEm. Besides this, coal-fired power vanishes by 2030 when the TrEm policy is applied regardless of nuclear assumptions. Moreover, the penetration of wind and solar would not be as much as targeted even if high subsidy rates are modelled as they are specified in the current regulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Kat, Bora & Paltsev, Sergey & Yuan, Mei, 2017. "An Assessment of Turkish Energy Sector Development under the Paris Agreement Goals using a CGE Model with Detailed Representation of Power Sector," Conference papers 332822, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332822
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/332822/files/8681.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Telli, Çagatay & Voyvoda, Ebru & Yeldan, Erinç, 2008. "Economics of environmental policy in Turkey: A general equilibrium investigation of the economic evaluation of sectoral emission reduction policies for climate change," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 321-340.
    2. Jeffrey C Peters, 2016. "The GTAP-Power Data Base: Disaggregating the Electricity Sector in the GTAP Data Base," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 1(1), pages 209-250, June.
    3. Rutherford, Thomas F., 1995. "Extension of GAMS for complementarity problems arising in applied economic analysis," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 19(8), pages 1299-1324, November.
    4. Rutherford, Thomas F, 1999. "Applied General Equilibrium Modeling with MPSGE as a GAMS Subsystem: An Overview of the Modeling Framework and Syntax," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 14(1-2), pages 1-46, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kat, Bora & Paltsev, Sergey & Yuan, Mei, 2018. "Turkish energy sector development and the Paris Agreement goals: A CGE model assessment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 84-96.
    2. Hong, Wei-Hong & Chai, Hui-Chih & Chen, Y.-H. Henry & Reilly, John & Paltsev, Sergey, 2019. "Implications of Updating the Input-output Database of a Computable General Equilibrium Model on Emissions Mitigation Policy Analyses," Conference papers 333019, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    3. Hui-Chih Chai & Wei-Hong Hong & John M. Reilly & Sergey Paltsev & Y.-H. Henry Chen, 2019. "Will Greenhouse Gases Mitigation Policies Abroad Affect The Domestic Economy? The Case Of Taiwan," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(04), pages 1-26, November.
    4. Chen, Y.-H. Henry & Reilly, John & Paltsev, Sergey, 2018. "Did the shale gas boom reduce US CO2 emissions?," Conference papers 332954, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    5. Winchester, Niven & White, Dominic, 2022. "The Climate PoLicy ANalysis (C-PLAN) Model, Version 1.0," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. Y.-H. Henry Chen & John M Reilly & Sergey Paltsev, 2021. "The role of shale gas in shaping the U.S. long-run CO2 emissions," Energy & Environment, , vol. 32(4), pages 737-755, June.
    7. Niven Winchester & John M. Reilly, 2019. "The Economic, Energy, And Emissions Impacts Of Climate Policy In South Korea," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(03), pages 1-23, August.
    8. Winchester, Niven & Reilly, John M., 2020. "The economic and emissions benefits of engineered wood products in a low-carbon future," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    9. Bretschger, Lucas & Lechthaler, Filippo & Rausch, Sebastian & Zhang, Lin, 2017. "Knowledge diffusion, endogenous growth, and the costs of global climate policy," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 47-72.
    10. James Markusen & Thomas F. Rutherford & David Tarr, 2017. "Trade and direct investment in producer services and the domestic market for expertise," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Trade Policies for Development and Transition, chapter 19, pages 439-458, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    11. Chan, Gabriel & Reilly, John M. & Paltsev, Sergey & Chen, Y.-H. Henry, 2012. "The Canadian oil sands industry under carbon constraints," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 540-550.
    12. Sebastian Rausch & Valerie J. Karplus, 2014. "Markets versus Regulation: The Efficiency and Distributional Impacts of U.S. Climate Policy Proposals," The Energy Journal, , vol. 35(1_suppl), pages 199-228, June.
    13. Rausch, Sebastian & Yonezawa, Hidemichi, 2023. "Green technology policies versus carbon pricing: An intergenerational perspective," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    14. Chen, Y.-H. Henry, 2015. "Economic Projection with Non-homothetic Preferences: The Performance and Application of a CDE Demand System," Conference papers 332611, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    15. James R. Markusen & Thomas F. Rutherford & David Tarr, 2000. "Foreign Direct Investments in Services and the Domestic Market for Expertise," NBER Working Papers 7700, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Sara Proença, 2013. "The role of renewable energy in Portugal´s decarbonisation strategy – application of the HyBGEM model," EcoMod2013 5647, EcoMod.
    17. Edward J. Balistreri & Christoph Böhringer & Thomas F. Rutherford, 2018. "Quantifying Disruptive Trade Policies," CESifo Working Paper Series 7382, CESifo.
    18. Pereira, Matheus Wemerson Gomes & Teixeira, Erly Cardoso & Gurgel, Angelo Costa, 2009. "Economic Loss to the Brazilian Regions Due to the Doha Round Failure," Working Papers in Applied Economics 53247, Universidade Federal de Vicosa, Departamento de Economia Rural.
    19. Landis, Florian & Fredriksson, Gustav & Rausch, Sebastian, 2021. "Between- and within-country distributional impacts from harmonizing carbon prices in the EU," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    20. Lau, Morten I. & Pahlke, Andreas & Rutherford, Thomas F., 2002. "Approximating infinite-horizon models in a complementarity format: A primer in dynamic general equilibrium analysis," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 577-609, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Resource /Energy Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332822. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.