IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/332274.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

What is the Price of Austerity? – A Dynamic AGE-analysis for Finland

Author

Listed:
  • Honkatukia, Juha
  • Tamminen, Saara

Abstract

The current economic turmoil within the Euro area has brought fiscal stance at the core of economic debate. In most EU countries public deficits have increased and different types of “austerity packages” are considered. Typically these packages consist of tax increases and public spending cuts. In this study we assess the effects of planned Finnish public spending cuts on the local economy, on fiscal sustainability and on income inequality in short and long run. We use a dynamic AGE model to estimate the effects. The model has been extended in two major respects for the analysis of these welfare effects. First, the model covers income decile-specific employment/leisure and saving choices. Second, it takes into consideration the direct welfare effects of government spending on households. To evaluate the welfare effects of public services provision, we use recent data on income decile-specific, non-market consumption of public services. This allows us to study the welfare effects of cuts in specific, publicly provided services. We calculate the dynamic Marginal Cost of Funds (MCF) and the effects on income inequality. Our central finding is that the welfare costs, and thus the plausibility of the austerity package, depend on the type of the public spending cuts. When spending cuts concern public services that are of indirect use to the consumers, welfare effects are negligible. If public services that do provide direct utility are cut, welfare is affected much more strongly. In general, the Finnish austerity package is found to be even welfare improving according to the dynamic MCF calculations. However, it increases slightly income inequality between households.

Suggested Citation

  • Honkatukia, Juha & Tamminen, Saara, 2012. "What is the Price of Austerity? – A Dynamic AGE-analysis for Finland," Conference papers 332274, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/332274/files/5784.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Victor Duarte Lledo, 2005. "Tax Systems Under Fiscal Adjustment: A Dynamic CGE Analysis of the Brazilian Tax Reform," IMF Working Papers 2005/142, International Monetary Fund.
    2. Radulescu, Doina & Stimmelmayr, Michael, 2010. "The impact of the 2008 German corporate tax reform: A dynamic CGE analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 454-467, January.
    3. Olivier Blanchard & Roberto Perotti, 2002. "An Empirical Characterization of the Dynamic Effects of Changes in Government Spending and Taxes on Output," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 117(4), pages 1329-1368.
    4. Omar O. Chisari & Martin Cicowiez, 2010. "Marginal Cost of Public Funds and Regulatory Regimes: Computable General Equilibrium Evaluation for Argentina," Revista de Analisis Economico – Economic Analysis Review, Universidad Alberto Hurtado/School of Economics and Business, vol. 25(1), pages 79-116, June.
    5. Ballard, Charles L & Shoven, John B & Whalley, John, 1985. "General Equilibrium Computations of the Marginal Welfare Costs of Taxes in the United States," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(1), pages 128-138, March.
    6. Kleven, Henrik Jacobsen & Kreiner, Claus Thustrup, 2006. "The marginal cost of public funds: Hours of work versus labor force participation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(10-11), pages 1955-1973, November.
    7. Liqun Liu, 2004. "The Marginal Cost of Funds and the Shadow Prices of Public Sector Inputs and Outputs," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 11(1), pages 17-29, January.
    8. Bohringer, Christoph & Boeters, Stefan & Feil, Michael, 2005. "Taxation and unemployment: an applied general equilibrium approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 81-108, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dixon, Peter & Honkatukia, Juha & Rimmer, Maureen, 2012. "The Marginal Cost of Funds from Different Taxes in Finland – An AGE evaluation," Conference papers 332273, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    2. Honkatukia, Juha & Dixon, Peter & Rimmer, Maureen & Tamminen, Saara, 2013. "The Costs of Fiscal Thrift," Conference papers 330255, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    3. Dolls, Mathias & Fuest, Clemens & Peichl, Andreas, 2012. "Automatic stabilizers and economic crisis: US vs. Europe," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 279-294.
    4. Andreas PEICHL, 2008. "The Benefits of Linking CGE and Microsimulation Models - Evidence from a Flat Tax analysis," EcoMod2008 23800106, EcoMod.
    5. James E. Anderson & Will Martin, 2011. "Costs of Taxation and Benefits of Public Goods with Multiple Taxes and Goods," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 13(2), pages 289-309, April.
    6. Kleven, Henrik Jacobsen & Kreiner, Claus Thustrup, 2006. "The marginal cost of public funds: Hours of work versus labor force participation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(10-11), pages 1955-1973, November.
    7. Salvador Barrios & Jonathan Pycroft & Bert Saveyn, 2013. "The marginal cost of public funds in the EU: the case of labour versus green taxes," Taxation Papers 35, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.
    8. Shun-ichiro Bessho & Masayoshi Hayashi, 2013. "Estimating the Social Marginal Cost of Public Funds," Public Finance Review, , vol. 41(3), pages 360-385, May.
    9. Plassmann, Florenz & Feltenstein, Andrew, 2016. "How large do multi-region models need to be?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 138-155.
    10. Ana-Isabel Guerra & Laura Varela-Candamio & Jesús López-Rodríguez, 2022. "Tax reforms in Spain: efficiency levels and distributional patterns," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 41-68, January.
    11. Eissa, Nada & Kleven, Henrik Jacobsen & Kreiner, Claus Thustrup, 2008. "Evaluation of four tax reforms in the United States: Labor supply and welfare effects for single mothers," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(3-4), pages 795-816, April.
    12. Stefan Boeters & Nico van Leeuwen, 2010. "A labour market extension for WorldScan; modelling labour supply, wage bargaining and unemployment in a CGE framework," CPB Document 201.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    13. Chris Jones, 2005. "Why the Marginal Social Cost of Funds is not the Shadow Value of Government Revenue," ANU Working Papers in Economics and Econometrics 2005-449, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics.
    14. Ahiteme N. Houndonougbo & Matthew N. Murray, 2019. "Millionaires or Job Creators: What Really Happens to Employment Growth When You Stick It to the Rich?," Public Finance Review, , vol. 47(1), pages 112-141, January.
    15. Boeters, Stefan & Savard, Luc, 2013. "The Labor Market in Computable General Equilibrium Models," Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, in: Peter B. Dixon & Dale Jorgenson (ed.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 1645-1718, Elsevier.
    16. Axelle Ferriere & Gaston Navarro, 2013. "The Heterogeneous Effects of Government Spending: It's All About Taxes," Working Papers 13-18, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics.
    17. Maurizio Ciaschini & Rosita Pretaroli & Francesca Severini & Claudio Socci, 2013. "Environmental tax and regional government consumption expenditure in a fiscal federalism system," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(2), pages 129-152.
    18. Liqun Liu, 2006. "Combining Distributional Weights and the Marginal Cost of Funds," Public Finance Review, , vol. 34(1), pages 60-79, January.
    19. Boeters, Stefan & Savard, Luc, 2011. "The labour market in CGE models," ZEW Discussion Papers 11-079, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    20. Lemelin, André & Savard, Luc, 2022. "What do CGE models have to say about fiscal reform?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 758-774.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.