IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nswprr/280787.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Economic Evaluation of the FutureDairy Complementary Forage Rotation System – Using Whole Farm Budgeting

Author

Listed:
  • Alford, Andrew
  • Garcia, S.C.
  • Farina, Santiago
  • Fulkerson, Bill

Abstract

A complementary forage rotation (CFR) aims to achieve high levels of home-grown forage to complement high performance dairy pastures. An economic evaluation of the CFR technology is undertaken by combining biophysical modelling with preliminary results from farm trials conducted at the University of Sydney’s Corstorphine Dairy. This data is applied to steady state whole farm budgets to compare four alternate or progressive scenarios that might be considered by farmers looking at the potential to increase farm productivity through their feeding system beyond a base farm scenario. A base scenario of a relatively well managed dairy farm in NSW, with 140 ha of milking area, stocked at 2.4 cows/ha, utilises about 12 t DM/ha/year under irrigation and produces more than 16,000 L/ha/year from 6,900 L/cow, achieves 0.9 per cent return on assets. A system with improved pasture management over the base scenario, utilising 15.6 t DM/ha/year and 1.3 t DM/cow/lactation of concentrates to achieve 6,900 L/cow obtains 3.4 per cent return on assets. A production system where pasture and supplement (concentrates) are emphasised achieves 6 per cent return on assets (3.7 cows/ha, 9,000L/cow and 2.3 t DM/cow/lactation concentrates). In comparison the CFS system obtains a return on total assets of 8 to 12 per cent, based upon actual or targeted (best case) forage yield results, respectively. The CFS-based farm business becomes relatively more profitable when scenarios with increased cost of fertiliser, water and especially grain are examined. A production system incorporating the complementary forage rotation (CFS) has the potential to be profitable. However, these analyses are based upon a steady state situation, after the implementation of the systems on farm, and implementation costs associated with adopting the technology on individual farms should be considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Alford, Andrew & Garcia, S.C. & Farina, Santiago & Fulkerson, Bill, 2009. "An Economic Evaluation of the FutureDairy Complementary Forage Rotation System – Using Whole Farm Budgeting," Research Reports 280787, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:nswprr:280787
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.280787
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/280787/files/ERR45.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.280787?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malcolm, Bill, 2004. "Where's the economics? The core discipline of farm management has gone missing!," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(3), pages 1-23.
    2. Pannell, D. J., 1999. "On the estimation of on-farm benefits of agricultural research," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 123-134, August.
    3. Farquharson, Robert J., 1991. "A Farm Level Evaluation of a New Twinning Technology in Beef Cattle," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 59(01), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Alford, Andrew & Garcia, S.C. & Farina, Santiago & Fulkerson, Bill, 2009. "An Economic Evaluation of the FutureDairy Complementary Forage Rotation System - Using Cost Budgeting," Research Reports 280786, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.
    5. Bill Malcolm, 2004. "Where's the economics? The core discipline of farm management has gone missing!," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(3), pages 395-417, September.
    6. Malcolm, Bill, 2004. "Farm Management analysis: a core discipline, simple sums, sophisticated thinking," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 1, pages 1-10.
    7. Jeremy D. Foltz & Hsiu-Hui Chang, 2002. "The Adoption and Profitability of rbST on Connecticut Dairy Farms," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 84(4), pages 1021-1032.
    8. Alford, Andrew R. & Griffith, Garry R. & Davies, Lloyd, 2003. "Livestock Farming Systems in the Northern Tablelands of NSW: An Economic Analysis," Research Reports 28005, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alford, Andrew & Garcia, S.C. & Farina, Santiago & Fulkerson, Bill, 2009. "An Economic Evaluation of the FutureDairy Complementary Forage Rotation System - Using Cost Budgeting," Research Reports 280786, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.
    2. Griffith, Garry & Alford, Andrew & Davies, Llyod & Herd, Robert & Parnell, Peter & Hegarty, Roger, 2004. "An Assessment of the Economic, Environmental and Social Impacts of NSW Agriculture’s Investment in the Net Feed Efficiency R,D&E Cluster," Research Reports 280780, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.
    3. Alford, Andrew R. & Griffith, Garry R. & Cacho, Oscar J., 2003. "A Northern Tablelands Whole-Farm Linear Program for Economic Evaluation of New Technologies at the Farm-Level," Research Reports 28010, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.
    4. Crosthwaite, Jim & Malcolm, Bill, 2006. "Farmer decisions, public policy and risk information in management of native pastures," 2006 Conference (50th), February 8-10, 2006, Sydney, Australia 174098, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    5. Farquharson, R.J. & Malcolm, B. & Chen, D., 2009. "PR - How Much Is A Kilogram Of Nitrogen Worth?," 17th Congress, Illinois State University, USA, July 19-24, 2009 345502, International Farm Management Association.
    6. Husemann, Christoph & Novković, Nebojša, 2014. "Farm Management Information Systems: A Case Study On A German Multifunctional Farm," Economics of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 61(2), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Alford, Andrew R. & Griffith, Garry R. & Cacho, Oscar J., 2003. "Farm-level Economic Evaluation of Net Feed Efficiency in Australia’s Southern Beef Cattle Production System: A Multi-period Linear Programming Approach," 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia 57826, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    8. Painter, Marvin J., 2007. "The impact of management skills on farm incomes in Canada," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 4(1-2), pages 1-13.
    9. Sauer, Johannes & Zilberman, David, 2009. "Innovation Behaviour At Farm Level – Selection And Identification," 83rd Annual Conference, March 30 - April 1, 2009, Dublin, Ireland 51073, Agricultural Economics Society.
    10. Nasca, J.A. & Feldkamp, C.R. & Arroquy, J.I. & Colombatto, D., 2015. "Efficiency and stability in subtropical beef cattle grazing systems in the northwest of Argentina," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 85-96.
    11. Caroline Roussy & Aude Ridier & Karim Chaïb, 2014. "Adoption d’innovations par les agriculteurs : rôle des perceptions et des préférences," Post-Print hal-01123427, HAL.
    12. Muhammad Azher Bhatti & Thomas Williams & David Laurence Hopkins & Leif Jarle Asheim & Geir Steinheim & Michael Campbell & Lars Olav Eik & Peter Charles Wynn & Tormod Ådnøy, 2019. "Adapting Seasonal Sheep Production to Year-Round Fresh Meat and Halal Market in Norway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, March.
    13. McLeod, Elizabeth & Jensen, Kimberly & Griffith, Andrew & Lewis, Karen, 2017. "Tennessee Beef Producers' Willingness to Participate in a Tennessee Branded Beef Program," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252649, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    14. Féménia, Fabienne & Letort, Elodie, 2016. "How to achieve significant reduction in pesticide use? An empirical evaluation of the impacts of pesticide taxation associated to a change in cropping practice," Working Papers 233482, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    15. Villalba, D. & Díez-Unquera, B. & Carrascal, A. & Bernués, A. & Ruiz, R., 2019. "Multi-objective simulation and optimisation of dairy sheep farms: Exploring trade-offs between economic and environmental outcomes," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 107-118.
    16. Lewis, C. & Malcolm, B. & Farquharson, B. & Leury, B. & Behrendt, R. & Clark, S., 2011. "PR - Profitability And Risk Evaluation Of Novel Perennial Pasture Systems For Livestock Producers In The High Rainfall Zone: Initial Analysis And Results (p273-286)," 18th Congress, Methven, New Zealand, 2011 345578, International Farm Management Association.
    17. Tarrant, Katherine A. & Malcolm, Bill, 2011. "Open to Ideas: Information flows from Dairy Directions to Dairy Farmers," 2011 Conference (55th), February 8-11, 2011, Melbourne, Australia 100717, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    18. Ufer, Danielle J. & Ortega, David L. & Wolf, Christopher A. & McKendree, Melissa & Swanson, Janice, 2022. "Getting past the gatekeeper: Key motivations of dairy farmer intent to adopt animal health and welfare-improving biotechnology," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    19. Boaitey, Albert & Goddard, Ellen & Mohapatra, Sandeep & Hailu, Getu, 2014. "Cow-Calf Producer Risk Preference Impacts On Willingness To Pay For Sustainable Breeding Practices," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170231, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Qiangbing Chen & Yali Liu, 2011. "The Diffusion of a Process Innovation with Gently Declining Production Cost," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 109-129, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nswprr:280787. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aenswau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.