IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ndtr10/207250.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The challenges of measuring transportation efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Sullivan, James L.
  • Aultman-Hall, Lisa
  • Watts, Richard

Abstract

In the US, concerns about dependence on oil (foreign oil in particular) have intensified and the transportation sector has garnered increased attention for its contribution to global warming. In response to these concerns, there is an increasing focus on the efficiency of our transportation systems. The objectives of this paper are to provide a framework for defining transportation efficiency (TE), highlight the ambiguities present in the transportation-research literature and in public policy, and describe the challenges that come with attempts to comprehensively measure TE. Of particular concern are the many studies which simply describe policy strategies associated with TE, without attempting to comprehensively define or measure it. Defining “transportation efficiency” as the maximization of services at the lowest possible cost will require that a variety of costs and service variables be assimilated into a comprehensive measurement tool. Such a tool could be used to find a TE index for temporal and operation TE comparisons. However, temporal applications are susceptible to rebound effects and operational comparisons are susceptible to shifting effects. Few assimilative measures of TE have been found which even attempt to deal with these potential sources of error. Better models are needed to adequately assimilate a wide variety of economic, environmental, human, energy, and operational variables on TE, and to assess rebound and shifting effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Sullivan, James L. & Aultman-Hall, Lisa & Watts, Richard, 2010. "The challenges of measuring transportation efficiency," 51st Annual Transportation Research Forum, Arlington, Virginia, March 11-13, 2010 207250, Transportation Research Forum.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr10:207250
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.207250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/207250/files/2010_42_Challenges_Measuring_Transportation_Efficiency.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.207250?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barth, Matthew & Shaheen, Susan A & Fukuda, Tuenjai & Fukuda, Atsushi, 2006. "Carsharing and Station Cars in Asia: Overview of Japan and Singapore," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2162b2zt, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    2. Dahlgren, Joy, 2002. "High-occupancy/toll lanes: where should they be implemented?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 239-255, March.
    3. Norah Montes de Oca & David Levinson, 2006. "Network Expansion Decision-making in the Twin Cities," Working Papers 200608, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xu, Meng & Grant-Muller, Susan & Gao, Ziyou, 2015. "Evolution and assessment of economic regulatory policies for expressway infrastructure in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 42-49.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Janson, Michael & Levinson, David, 2014. "HOT or not," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 21-32.
    2. Cassidy, Michael J. & Jang, Kitae & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2010. "The smoothing effect of carpool lanes on freeway bottlenecks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 65-75, February.
    3. Mengwei Chen & Yilin Sun & E Owen D Waygood & Jincheng Yu & Kai Zhu, 2022. "User characteristics and service satisfaction of car sharing systems: Evidence from Hangzhou, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-16, February.
    4. De Vos, Jonas, 2016. "Road pricing in a polycentric urban region: Analysing a pilot project in Belgium," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 134-142.
    5. Zhong, Lin & Zhang, Kenan & (Marco) Nie, Yu & Xu, Jiuping, 2020. "Dynamic carpool in morning commute: Role of high-occupancy-vehicle (HOV) and high-occupancy-toll (HOT) lanes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 98-119.
    6. Andre De Palma & Moez Kilani & Robin Lindsey, 2006. "The Economics of Truck Toll Lanes," ERSA conference papers ersa06p896, European Regional Science Association.
    7. Burris, Mark W. & Figueroa, Carlos F., 2006. "Analysis of Traveler Characteristics by Mode Choice in HOT Corridors," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 45(2).
    8. Abulibdeh, Ammar & Zaidan, Esmat, 2018. "Analysis of factors affecting willingness to pay for high-occupancy-toll lanes: Results from stated-preference survey of travelers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 91-105.
    9. Finkleman, Jeremy & Casello, Jeffrey & Fu, Liping, 2011. "Empirical evidence from the Greater Toronto Area on the acceptability and impacts of HOT lanes," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 814-824, November.
    10. Tscharaktschiew, Stefan & Reimann, Felix, 2023. "The economics of speed choice and control in the presence of driverless vehicle cruising and parking-as-a-substitute-for-cruising," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    11. David Levinson & Feng Xie & Norah Oca, 2012. "Forecasting and Evaluating Network Growth," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 239-262, June.
    12. Clements, Lewis M. & Kockelman, Kara M. & Alexander, William, 2021. "Technologies for congestion pricing," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    13. Hess, Stephane & Greene, Elizabeth R. & Falzarano, C. Stacey & Muriello, Mark, 2011. "Pay to drive in my bus lane: A stated choice analysis for the proposed Lincoln Tunnel HOT lane into Manhattan," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 649-656, September.
    14. de Palma, André & Kilani, Moez & Lindsey, Robin, 2008. "The merits of separating cars and trucks," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 340-361, September.
    15. Correia, Gonçalo Homem de Almeida & Antunes, António Pais, 2012. "Optimization approach to depot location and trip selection in one-way carsharing systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 233-247.
    16. Daniel A. Brent & Austin Gross, 2018. "Dynamic road pricing and the value of time and reliability," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 330-349, March.
    17. Lapardhaja, Servet & Jalota, Devansh & Doig, Jean & Almubarak, Abdullah & Cassidy, Michael, 2021. "Testing alternative treatments for underused carpool lanes on narrow freeways," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 139-149.
    18. Fan, Wenbo & Jiang, Xinguo & Erdogan, Sevgi & Sun, Yanshuo, 2016. "Modeling and evaluating FAIR highway performance and policy options," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 156-168.
    19. Xiqun (Michael) Chen & Xiang He & Chenfeng Xiong & Zheng Zhu & Lei Zhang, 2019. "A Bayesian Stochastic Kriging Optimization Model Dealing with Heteroscedastic Simulation Noise for Freeway Traffic Management," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 545-565, March.
    20. Chu, Chih-Peng & Tsai, Jyh-Fa & Hu, Shou-Ren, 2012. "Optimal starting location of an HOV lane for a linear monocentric urban area," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 457-466.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr10:207250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.trforum.org/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.