IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nccewp/340057.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Encouraging Rural Sanitation Take-up: Insights from Experimental Evaluations of Interventions

Author

Listed:
  • Gautam, Sanghmitra
  • Gechter, Michael
  • Guiteras, Raymond P.
  • Mobarak, Ahmed Mushfiq

Abstract

We conduct an organized review of intervention-based studies that aim to promote improved sanitation adoption and use RCTs for evaluation. We impose systematic inclusion criteria to identify such studies, and compile their microdata to harmonize outcome and covariate measures as well as estimands across studies. We then re-analyze their data to report metrics that are consistently defined and measured across studies. We compare the relative effectiveness of different classes of interventions implemented in overlapping ways across four countries: community-level demand encouragement, sanitation subsidies, product information campaigns, and offering microcredit to finance product purchases. Interventions with financial benefits generally outperform information and education campaigns. Effects are typically larger for households with higher shares of women and differ little by poverty status, but more research is needed to confirm our conclusions on effect heterogeneity by household characteristics.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:ags:nccewp:340057
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.340057
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/340057/files/Encouraging-Rural-Sanitation-Takeup-Insights-from-Experimental-Evaluations-of-Interventions.pdf
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.340057?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

Consumer/Household Economics;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nccewp:340057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dancsus.html .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.