IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ifma99/346546.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Modelling the Relationships Between Farmers' Objectives and the Decisions Related to the Stocking Rate in Beef Production Systems of Central Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Costa, Fernando Palm
  • Rehman, Tahir

Abstract

In Central Brazil, the sustainability of beef cattle systems is under threat. More than half the 50 million ha of sown pastures are suffering from degradation. Overgrazing is one of the main causes, and therefore choice of the stocking rate is a crucial decision taken by the farmers. Hypotheses to explain the overgrazing paradox have been explored by a model where 'cattle ownership' and ‘economic returns' were optimized individually and then simultaneously, using Multi-period Linear Programming and Compromise Programming techniques. Different scenarios based on farmers' attitudes towards overgrazing, pasture costs and capital availability were analysed. In some cases, benefits from holding more cattle can compensate for the increasing costs of maintaining pastures - an observation that undermines the hypothesis that farmers practise overgrazing because they are unaware or uncaring about overgrazing costs. An appropriate approach to the problem of pasture degradation requires information on the economy of a wide range of pasture recovery and maintenance methods, accepting that some level of overgrazing could be rational.

Suggested Citation

  • Costa, Fernando Palm & Rehman, Tahir, 1999. "Modelling the Relationships Between Farmers' Objectives and the Decisions Related to the Stocking Rate in Beef Production Systems of Central Brazil," 12th Congress, Durban, South Africa, July 18-24, 1999 346546, International Farm Management Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifma99:346546
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.346546
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifma99:346546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.