IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ifma19/345878.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pr - Resources Use, Technical Efficiency Of Maize Industry And Performance Of The South African Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Bahta, Yonas T.
  • van Niekerk, Walter

Abstract

Given the significance of maize within the overall food security strategies in Sub- Saharan Africa including South Africa, it is important to analyse the technical efficiency of the maize industry for the overall development of the economy. This article analyzes the impact of labor productivity, import price of the world, research and development on technical efficiency of maize industry in South Africa using a Computable General Equilibrium model and South Africa Social Accounting Matrix. The result revealed that maize producers used less intermediate inputs, value-added drops, increased export and reduced import due to an increase in production. Despite the rise in maize output, the demand for labour reduced. This was due to the indirect effect than a direct effect of the maize sector technical efficiency improvements. The study recommends that the improvement of technical efficiency directly related to competitiveness and welfare, therefore, in spite of employment reducing effect, the government should pursue to increase the rate of technical development.

Suggested Citation

  • Bahta, Yonas T. & van Niekerk, Walter, 2019. "Pr - Resources Use, Technical Efficiency Of Maize Industry And Performance Of The South African Economy," 22nd Congress, Tasmania, Australia, March 3-8, 2019 345878, International Farm Management Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifma19:345878
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/345878/files/PR-2019-IFMA_VanNiekerk_58.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.345878?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sherman Robinson & Andrea Cattaneo & Moataz El-Said, 2001. "Updating and Estimating a Social Accounting Matrix Using Cross Entropy Methods," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 47-64.
    2. Y.T. Bahta & B.J. Willemse & B. Grove, 2014. "The role of agriculture in welfare, income distribution and economic development of the Free State Province of South Africa: A CGE approach," Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 46-74, March.
    3. Kalie Pauw & Scott Mcdonald & Cecilia Punt, 2007. "Agricultural efficiency and welfare in South Africa," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 309-333.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramigo Pfunzo & Yonas T. Bahta & Henry Jordaan, 2024. "Insights into the Impact of Irrigation Agriculture on the Economy of the Limpopo Province, South Africa: A Social Accounting Matrix Multiplier Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-27, July.
    2. Bahta, Yonas Tesfamariam, 2014. "The Impact Of International Oil Price Increase On The Economy Of Free State Province Of South Africa," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 2(1), pages 1-10, January.
    3. Dorosh, Paul A. & Thurlow, James, 2011. "Urbanization and economic transformation: A CGE analysis for Ethiopia," ESSP working papers 14, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Carlos Adri?n Romero & Omar Osvaldo Chisari & Leonardo Javier Mastronardi & Arturo Leonardo V?squez Cordano, 2015. "The cost of failing to prevent gas supply interruption: A CGE assessment for Peru," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(2), pages 131-148.
    5. Carmen Rodríguez Morilla & Gaspar Llanes Díaz-Salazar & Manuel Alejandro Cardenete, "undated". "Estimación anual de matrices de contabilidad social: Aplicación a la economía espanola para los anos 1995 Y 1998," Studies on the Spanish Economy 176, FEDEA.
    6. Ichihara, Silvio Massaru & Guilhoto, Joaquim José Martins & Imori, Denise, 2009. "Combining geoprocessing and interregional input-output systems: An application to the State of São Paulo in Brazil," MPRA Paper 30696, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Antoine Bouët & Guillaume Gruère & Laetitia Leroy, 2011. "The Price and Trade Effects of Strict Information Requirements for Genetically ModifiedCommodities under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety," Working papers of CATT hal-02948015, HAL.
    8. Go, Delfin S. & Lofgren, Hans & Ramos, Fabian Mendez & Robinson, Sherman, 2016. "Estimating parameters and structural change in CGE models using a Bayesian cross-entropy estimation approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 52(PB), pages 790-811.
    9. Marc Mueller & Emanuele Ferrari, 2012. "Social Accounting Matrices and Satellite Accounts for EU27 on NUTS2 Level (SAMNUTS2)," JRC Research Reports JRC73088, Joint Research Centre.
    10. Onil Banerjee & Martín Cicowiez & Jamie Cotta, 2016. "Economic Assessment of Development Interventions in Data Poor Countries: An Application to Belize’s Sustainable Tourism Program," CEDLAS, Working Papers 0194, CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
    11. Andreas Mense & Andreas Mense, DIW Berlin/FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg & Konstanin Kholodilin, Ph.D, DIW Berlin, 2011. "A 71 Sector CGE Model for Germany," EcoMod2011 2941, EcoMod.
    12. Ling Yang & James Thurlow & Michael L. Lahr, 2012. "The (Declining) Role of Households in Sustaining China's Economy: Structural Path Analysis for 1997-2007," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2012-083, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    13. Mauricio Bittencourt & Donald Larson & David Kraybill, 2010. "Regional Short-Run Effects Of Trade Liberalization In Brazil," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 65-85.
    14. Jairo Augusto NUNEZ-MENDEZ & N´estor Gonz´alez & Gustavo Hernández, 2007. "¿Es posible alcanzar los objetivos del Milenio en Colombia? Una evaluación de estrategias de focalización y financiamiento," Archivos de Economía 11218, Departamento Nacional de Planeación.
    15. Dorosh, Paul A. & Thurlow, James, 2014. "Beyond agriculture versus nonagriculture: Decomposing sectoral growth–poverty linkages in five African countries:," IFPRI discussion papers 1391, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    16. Jensen, Henning Tarp & Keogh-Brown, Marcus R. & Shankar, Bhavani & Aekplakorn, Wichai & Basu, Sanjay & Cuevas, Soledad & Dangour, Alan D. & Gheewala, Shabbir H. & Green, Rosemary & Joy, Edward J.M. & , 2019. "Palm oil and dietary change: Application of an integrated macroeconomic, environmental, demographic, and health modelling framework for Thailand," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 92-103.
    17. Martín Cicowiez & Javier Alejo & Luciano Di Gresia & Sergio Olivieri & World Bank & Ana Pacheco, 2016. "Export Taxes, World Prices, and Poverty in Argentina: A Dynamic CGEMicrosimulation Analysis [model, Argentina. Classification-JEL: C68, D58, I38, E62]," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 9(1), pages 24-54.
    18. Ana Corina Miller & Alan Matthews & Trevor Donnellan & Cathal O'Donoghue, 2011. "A 2005 Agriculture-Food SAM (AgriFood-SAM) for Ireland," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp372, IIIS.
    19. Ichihara, Silvio Massaru & Guilhoto, Joaquim José Martins & Imori, Denise, 2008. "Geoprocessing and estimation of interregional input-output systems an application to the state of Sao Paulo in Brazil," MPRA Paper 54036, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Patrizio Lecca & Peter McGregor & Kim Swales, 2010. "Balanced Budget Government Spending in a Small Open Regional Economy," Working Papers 1020, University of Strathclyde Business School, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifma19:345878. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.