Author
Abstract
Why is there a strong and growing demand for farmland investment from the non-agricultural sector? Over the study period 1972-2011, North American farmland investment yields have been very competitive with stocks, bonds and real estate. In this study, three methods are used to assess the investment performance of farmland within a diversified portfolio: the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), the Expected Value-Variance Model (E-V Analysis), and the Value at Risk (VAR) Model. The CAPM analysis suggests that farmland provides an investment yield that is greater than required, given that it adds little or no risk to a diversified portfolio. This also implies that farmland, given its competitive yield, can enhance investment performance in a diversified portfolio. Since CAPM is an equilibrium pricing model, it further suggests that farmland is underpriced and in a liquid, free trading market place, farmland prices would be bid up until the excess return disappears. The E-V analysis found that a North American farmland investment can improve the investment performance of the efficient set of portfolios at low and medium risk levels, but does not provide improvement for higher risk portfolios. Finally, the VAR analysis found that when North American farmland is added to a diversified portfolio, it reduces the maximum expected loss that can occur, thereby reducing the downside risk of the portfolio without reducing the expected yield. In general, all three methods, CAPM, E-V analysis and VAR found consistent results; that North American farmland has a competitive yield and is very good at reducing risk in a diversified portfolio, thereby improving overall investment performance.
Suggested Citation
Painter, Marvin J., 2013.
"PR - North American Farmland Investment Performance Assessment Using E-V Analysis, CAPM And Value At Risk,"
19th Congress, Warsaw, Poland, 2013
345689, International Farm Management Association.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ifma13:345689
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345689
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifma13:345689. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.