IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ifma13/345659.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

PR - Economic Costs Of Soil Nutrient Mining And Benefits From Plant Nutrient Recycling: The Case Of Switchgrass Produced For Bioenergy Feedstock

Author

Listed:
  • Biermacher, Jon T.
  • Haque, Mohua
  • Kering, Maru K.
  • Guretzky, John A.

Abstract

Few attempts have been made to account for the potential costs associated with soil nutrient mining or the potential benefits associated with nutrient remobilization in switchgrass pastures established and managed as a dedicated bioenergy feedstock crop. Continuous soil nutrient mining could result in declining yields and profitability in the long-run and ultimately final exit out of switchgrass production. The objective of this study was to determine the cost associated with nutrient mining and the potential benefits associated with nutrient remobilization associated with one and two-cut switchgrass harvest systems in the southern Great Plain, USA. Data collected from a four-year, two-location agronomic field trial that evaluated two harvest systems, five N rates, and fixed rates of P and K applications were used for analysis. A standard forage analysis was used to determine the concentrations of N, P and K nutrients in the feedstock harvested. Cost of mining (or benefit of recycling) was estimated by comparing two separate economic models. Model 1 follows the conventional economic approach of utilizing yield response to treatments levels of N, P and K. Model 2 follows an approach that accounts for the costs and benefits associated with the N, P and K concentrations removed by the plants at harvest. Results from the convention economic approach indicate that producers should harvest twice per year, lending the system to mine significant quantities of N, P and K. When the benefits and costs associated with total nutrient uptake from plants were accounted, assuming a $110 Mg-1 for feedstock, the results indicate a producer would be better off harvesting twice (once in the summer and again in the winter), and the non-market economic tradeoff between nutrient mining and long-run soil sustainability was $8.70 Mg-1.

Suggested Citation

  • Biermacher, Jon T. & Haque, Mohua & Kering, Maru K. & Guretzky, John A., 2013. "PR - Economic Costs Of Soil Nutrient Mining And Benefits From Plant Nutrient Recycling: The Case Of Switchgrass Produced For Bioenergy Feedstock," 19th Congress, Warsaw, Poland, 2013 345659, International Farm Management Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifma13:345659
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/345659/files/13_Biermacher_etal_P31-38v3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.345659?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Resource /Energy Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifma13:345659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.