IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ifma07/345416.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

PR - Farmers’ Behavioural Inclinations And Their Influence On The Anticipated Response To The Reform Of The Common Agricultural Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Rehman, Tahir
  • Garforth, Chris
  • McKemey, Kevin
  • Yates, Chris
  • Rana, Ram

Abstract

Recently the University of Reading has completed a project on behalf of Defra (Department of Food, Environment and Rural Affairs) to understand the behaviour and motivation of farmers in adjusting to the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), particularly to the Single Payment Scheme. This research provides interesting insights into how farmers can be expected to use the Single Payment (SP). In the literature on goals and objectives, the main interest is in ascertaining farmers’ motivations for being in farming. The Reading project has created an ‘influence’ model to identify the factors that are likely to determine farmers’ responses, in a differentiated way, to the unprecedented event of the SP. The Reading typology of farmers is a refined set of behavioural types, capable of providing insights into farmers’ intentions with regard to the SP. The project has used data from a survey, which used a postal questionnaire with a stratified (by region and farm type) random sample of 3,000 farmers in England in January 2006. Some 683 useable responses to 25 statements on “objectives†in farming, and 26 statements on “values†were generated. The questionnaire also elicited farmers’ attitudes and likely responses to the introduction of the SP. A set of six behavioural responses were identified through discussion with farmers including a general response of changing one’s farming system and practices in the next five years, and five specific ways of applying the SP. The analysis of farmers’ responses shows that of the five potential methods of using the SP, the most likely to be adopted is to regard it as a substitute for the previous production-linked subsidies. The respondents felt that family members, business partners, accountants and the farming press would strongly support changing the farming system and practices as a result of the SP, while Defra, land agents and other farmers would be indifferent or against the idea. Amongst all five farmer types the family is the strongest influence. Referents fall into three distinct categories: referents external to the farm business, farming peers, and those that are internal to the business (including family members and business partners). Attitudes, perceived behavioural control and the views of others all have a significant influence on farmers’ behavioural intentions with respect to the use of the SP.

Suggested Citation

  • Rehman, Tahir & Garforth, Chris & McKemey, Kevin & Yates, Chris & Rana, Ram, 2007. "PR - Farmers’ Behavioural Inclinations And Their Influence On The Anticipated Response To The Reform Of The Common Agricultural Policy," 16th Congress, Cork, Ireland, July 15-20, 2007 345416, International Farm Management Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifma07:345416
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/345416/files/07Rehman_etal.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.345416?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifma07:345416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.