IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ifma03/24326.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

On-Farm Benchmarking: How to Do It and How to Do It Better

Author

Listed:
  • Franks, J.R.
  • Collis, Jimi

Abstract

Benchmarking is the practice of establishing the relative performance of a business or enterprise against an appropriate standard, generally industry standards derived from a survey of farms. The Policy Commission into the Future of Farming and Food (2002) highlighted a need to spread and improve benchmarking on farms. The requirements of effective benchmarking are illustrated in a ten step framework. The ten steps illustrate the range of expertise and resources a manager requires before being able to justify allocating resources to benchmarking. A comparison of alternative farm surveys and methodologies used to collect, analyse and report industry standards illustrates the difficulties farmers can have in identifying appropriate, robust and accurate industry standards. It is concluded that there needs to be a thorough rationalisation of farm surveys and agreement on methodologies to make benchmarking more effective and more efficient.

Suggested Citation

  • Franks, J.R. & Collis, Jimi, 2003. "On-Farm Benchmarking: How to Do It and How to Do It Better," 14th Congress, Perth, Western Australia, August 10-15, 2003 24326, International Farm Management Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifma03:24326
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.24326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/24326/files/cp03fr01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.24326?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronan, Glenn & Cleary, Gordon, 2000. "Best Practice Benchmarking in Australian Agriculture: Issues and Challenges," 2000 Conference (44th), January 23-25, 2000, Sydney, Australia 123728, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    2. Jeremy Franks, 2003. "Revised Agri-environment Policy Objectives: Implications for Scheme Design," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(3), pages 443-466.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hans Vrolijk & Krijn Poppe, 2021. "Cost of Extending the Farm Accountancy Data Network to the Farm Sustainability Data Network: Empirical Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-13, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sefton, Clive A. & Cox, Rodney J., 2005. "A business performance index model that measures wealth change in Australian farm businesses," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 2(2), pages 1-13.
    2. Elisa I. Cano Montero & Clara Isabel Muñoz Colomina & Elena Urquia Grande, 2007. "Agri-environmental indicators in the management of farms. the Spanish case," Documentos de trabajo de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales 07-04, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales.
    3. Franks, Jeremy R., 2009. "CS - Size And Non-size Effects On The Profitability Of Farms In English Less Favoured Areas," 17th Congress, Illinois State University, USA, July 19-24, 2009 345540, International Farm Management Association.
    4. Ronan, Glenn, 2002. "Delving and Divining for Australian Farm Management Agenda: 1970-2010," 2002 Conference (46th), February 13-15, 2002, Canberra, Australia 174039, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    5. Ronan, Glenn, 2002. "Delving and Divining for Australian Farm Management Agenda: 1970-2010," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 10, pages 1-24, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Farm Management;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifma03:24326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.