IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aare00/123728.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Best Practice Benchmarking in Australian Agriculture: Issues and Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Ronan, Glenn
  • Cleary, Gordon

Abstract

The quest to shape Australian agriculture for improved and sustainable profitability is leading Research and Development Corporations, agri-service consultants and government to devote substantial effort into development of new farm business analysis and benchmarking programs. ‘Biz Check’, ‘Pork Biz’, ‘Wool Enterprise Benchmarking’, ‘Dairy Business Focus’ and ‘Business Skills and Best Practice’ for beef and sheep meat producers are examples of current farm management and training programs where business analysis and benchmarking are integral components. Benchmarking is currently very popular with farmers, service providers and funding agencies. However, benchmarking has been likened to comparative analysis with both criticised by past and present prominent agricultural economists as ‘random numbers’ and ‘rampant empiricism’. The authors agree with advocates of benchmarking that it has potential as a supply chain and farm business improvement tool. They also agree with critics that much of what is currently flagged as benchmarking is actually financial analysis, lacks linkage to underlying enterprise operations and fails to add value in between-business comparison. Most packages do not encompass off-farm, supply-chain environment factors. Further, some ‘benchmarking’ employs some unsound methodology. Reconciliation of current conflicting, polar positions is recommended in the development of best practice benchmarking, differentiated by its process based, diagnostic power. In best practice mode, benchmarking should be capable of delving beneath performance outcomes and into a logical framework for making changes to enterprise processes that are systemically linked to productivity and profitability.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronan, Glenn & Cleary, Gordon, 2000. "Best Practice Benchmarking in Australian Agriculture: Issues and Challenges," 2000 Conference (44th), January 23-25, 2000, Sydney, Australia 123728, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aare00:123728
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.123728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/123728/files/Ronan.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.123728?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ferris, Alexandria & Malcolm, Bill, 1999. "Sense and Nonsense in Dairy Farm Management Economic Analysis," 1999 Conference (43th), January 20-22, 1999, Christchurch, New Zealand 123803, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Franks, Jeremy R., 2009. "CS - Size And Non-size Effects On The Profitability Of Farms In English Less Favoured Areas," 17th Congress, Illinois State University, USA, July 19-24, 2009 345540, International Farm Management Association.
    2. Ronan, Glenn, 2002. "Delving and Divining for Australian Farm Management Agenda: 1970-2010," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 10, pages 1-24, September.
    3. Ronan, Glenn, 2002. "Delving and Divining for Australian Farm Management Agenda: 1970-2010," 2002 Conference (46th), February 13-15, 2002, Canberra, Australia 174039, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    4. Elisa I. Cano Montero & Clara Isabel Muñoz Colomina & Elena Urquia Grande, 2007. "Agri-environmental indicators in the management of farms. the Spanish case," Documentos de trabajo de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales 07-04, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales.
    5. Sefton, Clive A. & Cox, Rodney J., 2005. "A business performance index model that measures wealth change in Australian farm businesses," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 2(2), pages 1-13.
    6. Franks, J.R. & Collis, Jimi, 2003. "On-Farm Benchmarking: How to Do It and How to Do It Better," 14th Congress, Perth, Western Australia, August 10-15, 2003 24326, International Farm Management Association.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kingwell, Ross S., 2002. "Issues for Farm Management in the 21st Century: A view from the West," 2002 Conference (46th), February 13-15, 2002, Canberra, Australia 173982, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    2. Gyles, Oliver, 2002. "Estimating benefits for dairy production systems from sustainable irrigation practices: Intervention and adjustment in Victorian Land and Water Management Plans," 2002 Conference (46th), February 13-15, 2002, Canberra, Australia 125094, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    3. Sefton, Clive A. & Cox, Rodney J., 2005. "A business performance index model that measures wealth change in Australian farm businesses," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 2(2), pages 1-13.
    4. Chudleigh, Fred & Cox, Howard W. & Chapman, Veronica J., 2002. "Modelling profitable and sustainable farming systems in Central Queensland," 2002 Conference (46th), February 13-15, 2002, Canberra, Australia 125070, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    5. Fraser, Iain & Hone, Phillip, 2001. "Farm-level efficiency and productivity measurement using panel data: wool production in south-west Victoria," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 45(2), pages 1-18.
    6. Malcolm, Bill & Sinnett, Alex, 2007. "Future Productivity and Growth in Dairy Farm Businesses in New Zealand: the Status Quo is Not an Option," Papers 234175, University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Land and Environment.
    7. Gyles, Oliver, 2001. "Water Use Efficiency at the Farm and Regional Level: The Economics of Response and the Furphy of Excellence," 2001 Conference (45th), January 23-25, 2001, Adelaide, Australia 125647, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    8. Derham, Peta & Welsh, Pam, 2006. "Trial recommendations for the amelioration of a degraded chromosol landscape: Duri District, Northern NSW," 2006 Conference (50th), February 8-10, 2006, Sydney, Australia 139520, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    9. Rauniyar, Ganesh P. & Parker, W.J., 1999. "Longitudinal analysis of dairy farm income and expenditure in New Zealand: A review of 25 years of adjustment," 1999 Conference (43th), January 20-22, 1999, Christchurch, New Zealand 124540, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    10. Finlayson, John & Bathgate, Andrew & Nordblom, Tom & Theiveyanathan, Tivi & Farquharson, Bob & Crosbie, Russell & Mitchell, David & Hoque, Ziaul, 2010. "Balancing land use to manage river volume and salinity: Economic and hydrological consequences for the Little River catchment in Central West, New South Wales, Australia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(3), pages 161-170, March.
    11. Kingwell, Ross, 2002. "Issues for Farm Management in the 21st Century: A view from the West," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 10, pages 1-28, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aare00:123728. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.