Author
Listed:
- Heery, Declan
- O’Donoghue, Cathal
- Ó Fathartaigh, Mícheál
Abstract
In 2015, under its Food Wise 2025 strategy, the Irish government set itself the ambitious target of increasing Ireland’s income from agri‐food exports to €19 billion within ten years, an 85 per cent increase. This paper analyses the structure of the two main food systems in Ireland; the dairy and beef industries, to examine value chain efficiencies in production needed to achieve such a level of growth. This paper, lays bare a reality characterised by significant inefficiencies and suggests innovations to increase the competitiveness of the industries internationally. Moreover, the paper recognises that the ability of stakeholders to add value to primary products in the two main Irish food systems is key to the success of the Food Wise strategy. The methodology that the paper employs to analyse the dynamics of the Irish dairy and beef systems is the Global Value Chain (GVC) methodology championed and developed by the Center on Globalization, Governance & Competitiveness at Duke University. Through the disaggregation of the various segments that comprise the food systems, the GVC methodology allows for a multidimensional analysis, and for the identification of where rationalisation is required and where value may be added to primary products. The paper presents value chain maps for both the Irish dairy and beef systems to compare and contrast the structures, institutions, characteristics and effectiveness of the two value chains. The comparison illustrates cogently where rationalisation is needed and where value may be added. The paper finds that the Irish dairy system is more fragmented than the systems of other dairy‐producing countries and that at the farm and processing levels it still requires, despite much rationalisation since the 1980s, substantial consolidation may still be necessary. Regarding where value may be added to primary products, the paper finds that in the Irish dairy system there remains an over‐reliance on basic commodity sales and that innovation to open up entirely new markets, both in terms of products, such as in the area of sports nutrition, and geographically, such as middle‐eastern markets, with white cheese, is required. Regarding the Irish beef system it finds that while there is not as much scope for product diversification, innovation in branding and standardisation could produce a considerable dividend. Comparing value chain integration, the institutional structure built upon farmer owned cooperatives in the dairy sector allows for greater coordination and responsiveness to market opportunities. The beef value chain however is much less integrated, beset by cross‐value chain competition and low levels of trust, which has implications for future value generation and transformation across the chain.
Suggested Citation
Heery, Declan & O’Donoghue, Cathal & Ó Fathartaigh, Mícheál, 2016.
"Pursuing Added Value in the Irish Agri‐Food Sector: An Application of the Global Value Chain Methodology,"
2016 International European Forum (151st EAAE Seminar), February 15-19, 2016, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria
244470, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:iefi16:244470
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.244470
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- O’Donoghue, Cathal & Clavin, Dan & Ryan, Mary & Heery, Declan & Leavy, Elaine, 2018.
"Policy Incentives and the Organic Value Chain in Ireland,"
International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 9(1), January.
- Tsakiridis, Andreas & O’Donoghue, Cathal & Hynes, Stephen & Kilcline, Kevin, 2020.
"A Comparison of Environmental and Economic Sustainability across Seafood and Livestock Product Value Chains,"
Working Papers
309507, National University of Ireland, Galway, Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit.
- Rao Fu & Chenguang Li & Liming Wang, 2021.
"Market Power in the Irish Beef Processing Industry,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, June.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iefi16:244470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ilbonde.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.