IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iefi09/59190.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Impact of Media Coverage on Proposed Strategies for Preventing Future Food Scandals

Author

Listed:
  • Bohm, Justus
  • Schulze, Holger
  • Kleinschmit, Daniela
  • Spiller, Achim
  • Nowak, Beate

Abstract

At the beginning of the year 2005 the German meat industry frequently featured in the media with reports on tainted meat. Since then, a huge number of new problems concerning meat production and trade have arisen which have uncovered weaknesses in food quality control, and highlighted the explosive nature of this subject matter. It is unclear what effect the media involvement has had on the political process of regulatory decision-making in the food industry, and to what extent it has influenced this process. The following article examines these issues with regard to the presentation of food safety scandals in the media, as the role of press coverage will continue to increase in importance in the coming years. This research is based on the content analysis of 347 articles on the topic of “tainted meat” which were published in seven German newspapers. The empirical results demonstrate that state actors such as government ministers and the administration have dominated the debate in the media, and thus decisively contributed to the fact that the responsibility for food security in Germany is assigned to the government. Companies and organizations in the meat industry hardly ever appear in the discussion.

Suggested Citation

  • Bohm, Justus & Schulze, Holger & Kleinschmit, Daniela & Spiller, Achim & Nowak, Beate, 2009. "The Impact of Media Coverage on Proposed Strategies for Preventing Future Food Scandals," 2009 International European Forum, February 15-20, 2009, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 59190, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:iefi09:59190
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.59190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/59190/files/B_hm.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.59190?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iefi09:59190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ilbonde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.