IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaae06/25627.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Multilateral or Regional Agreement: The Case of Mediterranean Non-EU Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Mattas, Konstadinos
  • Tsakiridou, Efthimia
  • Somwaru, Agapi

Abstract

Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries are at a crossroad regarding potential trade reforms. The EU is not only the world's largest market for the region's agricultural products, but also remains the prime outlet for these Mediterranean countries' exports. An applied general equilibrium model is used to assess the impact of various trade reform options in the region. Results suggest that the region might benefit most under special provisions for developing countries. Under global trade reform, MENA preferences with EU might be eroded, with EU Mediterranean countries like Greece benefit the most with global trade reform.

Suggested Citation

  • Mattas, Konstadinos & Tsakiridou, Efthimia & Somwaru, Agapi, 2006. "Multilateral or Regional Agreement: The Case of Mediterranean Non-EU Countries," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25627, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae06:25627
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.25627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/25627/files/pp060701.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.25627?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diao, Xinshen & Somwaru, Agapi & Roe, Terry L., 2001. "A Global Analysis Of Agricultural Trade Reform In Wto Member Countries," Bulletins 12984, University of Minnesota, Economic Development Center.
    2. Xinshen Diao & Terry Roe & Agapi Somwaru, 2002. "Developing Country Interests in Agricultural Reforms under the World Trade Organization," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 84(3), pages 782-790.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William Edmondson & Matthew Shane & Agapi Somwaru, 2007. "Global Macroeconomic Shocks and U.S. Agriculture: An Interactive Matrix Approach," EcoMod2007 23900022, EcoMod.
    2. Konstantinos MATTAS & Agapi SOMWARU & Efthimia TSAKIRIDOU, 2001. "Multilateral or RTA: The Case of Mediterranean Counties," Middle East and North Africa 330400042, EcoMod.
    3. Roe, Terry L., 2003. "Markets, Trade And The Role Of Institutions In African Development," Conference Papers 28069, University of the Free State, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    4. Brockmeier, Martina & Urban, Kirsten, 2008. "Assessing the Impacts of Agricultural Policies on the Global, National and Farm level - A Survey of Model Systems," Conference papers 331684, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    5. Coxhead, Ian A. & Jayasuriya, Sisira, 2003. "Trade, Liberalization, Resource Degradation and Industrial Pollution in Developing Countries: An Integrated Analysis," Staff Papers 12691, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    6. Lucian Cernat & Sam Laird & Alessandro Turrini, 2003. "How Important are Market Access Issues for Developing Countries in the Doha Agenda?," International Trade 0302004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Kym Anderson, 2003. "Trade Liberalization, Agriculture, and Poverty in Low-income Countries," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2003-25, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    8. Huan-Niemi, Ellen & Kerkela, Leena & Lehtonen, Heikki & Niemi, Jyrki S., 2009. "Implications of Trade Liberalization and Domestic Reforms on EU Agricultural Markets," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 12(4), pages 1-32, November.
    9. Malik, R. P. S., 2009. "Indian agriculture: recent performance and prospects in the wake of globalization," IWMI Books, Reports H042037, International Water Management Institute.
    10. John C. Beghin & David Roland-Holst & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, 2002. "Global Agricultural Trade and the Doha Round: What are the Implications for North and South?," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 02-wp308, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    11. Hewitt, Joanna, 2008. "Impact evaluation of research by the International Food Policy Research Institute on agricultural trade liberalization, developing countries, and WTO's Doha negotiations:," Impact assessments 28, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    12. Bruce A. Babcock & John C. Beghin & Jacinto F. Fabiosa & Stephane De Cara & Amani Elobeid & Cheng Fang & Chad E. Hart & Murat Isik & Holger Matthey & Alexander E. Saak & Karen Kovarik & FAPRI Staff, 2002. "Doha Round of the World Trade Organization: Appraising Further Liberalization of Agricultural Markets, The," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 02-wp317, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    13. Pustovit, Nataliya & Schmitz, P. Michael, 2003. "Impact Of Agricultural Protection In Oecd-Countries On South African Agriculture," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25828, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Leudjou, Roland R., 2012. "The Doha Round and Food Security in the Dairy Sector in Cameroon: A Global Simulation Model (GSIM) Approach," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, April.
    15. Burfisher, Mary E. & Hanson, Kenneth & Hopkins, Jeffrey & Somwaru, Agapi, 2004. "Global Agriculural Reform and U.S. Agricultural Adjustment Capacity," Conference papers 331303, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    16. Conforti, Piero & Velazquez, Beatriz E., 2004. "The Effects of Alternative Proposals for Agricultural Export Subsidies in the Current WTO Round," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 5(1), pages 1-26.
    17. Agus Dwi Nugroho & Zoltan Lakner, 2022. "Impact of economic globalisation on agriculture in developing countries: A review," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(5), pages 180-188.
    18. repec:got:cegedp:67 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Luther G. Tweeten, 2001. "Directions of U.S. Farm Programmes under a Freer Trade Environment," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 40(2), pages 89-105.
    20. Anderson, Kym & Martin, Will & Valenzuela, Ernesto, 2006. "The relative importance of global agricultural subsidies and market access," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(3), pages 357-376, November.
    21. Devadoss, Stephen, 2002. "Domestic Support And Wto Negotiations From Developing Countries' Perspectives," 2002 Annual Meeting, July 28-31, 2002, Long Beach, California 36667, Western Agricultural Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Relations/Trade;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae06:25627. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.