IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaae14/183049.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Determinants of farmers’ uptake of animal health and welfare technologies under the common agricultural policy

Author

Listed:
  • Toma, Luiza
  • Barnes, Andrew Peter
  • Sutherland, Lee-Ann
  • Mathews, Keith
  • Stott, Alistair

Abstract

This study analyses the impact of a priori identified determinants of adoption of innovative animal health and welfare technologies by Scottish livestock farmers. The analysis uses a dataset of 1,764 observations for livestock farmers collected through a large scale survey of Scottish agricultural holdings, and structural equation modelling to test influences on technology adoption intentions and behaviour. Having made changes to business; perceived effects of technology and information on business; being recipient of a single farm payment; age; economic characteristics; access to/perceived usefulness of information; and perceived difficulty to change have significant influence on both technology adoption behaviour and intentions.

Suggested Citation

  • Toma, Luiza & Barnes, Andrew Peter & Sutherland, Lee-Ann & Mathews, Keith & Stott, Alistair, 2014. "Determinants of farmers’ uptake of animal health and welfare technologies under the common agricultural policy," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 183049, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaae14:183049
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.183049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/183049/files/Toma_et_al_poster_paper_2_EAAE2014.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.183049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Flett, Ross & Alpass, Fiona & Humphries, Steve & Massey, Claire & Morriss, Stuart & Long, Nigel, 2004. "The technology acceptance model and use of technology in New Zealand dairy farming," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 199-211, May.
    2. Nuthall, P. L., 2001. "Managerial ability -- a review of its basis and potential improvement using psychological concepts," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 24(3), pages 247-262, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nan-Hua Nadja Yang & Ana Carolina Bertassini & Jéssica Alves Justo Mendes & Mateus Cecílio Gerolamo, 2021. "The ‘3CE2CE’ Framework—Change Management Towards a Circular Economy: Opportunities for Agribusiness," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 697-718, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Williams, John & Malcolm, Bill, 2012. "Farmer decisions about selling wheat and managing wheat price risk in Australia," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 20, pages 1-10.
    2. Ramilan, Thiagarajah & Scrimgeour, Frank & Marsh, Dan, 2011. "Analysis of environmental and economic efficiency using a farm population micro-simulation model," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 81(7), pages 1344-1352.
    3. Nuthall, Peter L., 2012. "The intuitive world of farmers – The case of grazing management systems and experts," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 65-73.
    4. Micheels, Eric T. & Nolan, James F., 2016. "Examining the effects of absorptive capacity and social capital on the adoption of agricultural innovations: A Canadian Prairie case study," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 127-138.
    5. Melih Erdem & Hasan Burak Ağır, 2024. "Enhancing Dairy Farm Welfare: A Holistic Examination of Technology Adoption and Economic Performance in Kahramanmaraş Province, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, April.
    6. L. Toma & A. P. Barnes & L.-A. Sutherland & S. Thomson & F. Burnett & K. Mathews, 2018. "Impact of information transfer on farmers’ uptake of innovative crop technologies: a structural equation model applied to survey data," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 864-881, August.
    7. Federica Caffaro & Eugenio Cavallo, 2019. "The Effects of Individual Variables, Farming System Characteristics and Perceived Barriers on Actual Use of Smart Farming Technologies: Evidence from the Piedmont Region, Northwestern Italy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-13, May.
    8. van de Ven, G.W.J. & van Keulen, H., 2007. "A mathematical approach to comparing environmental and economic goals in dairy farming: Identifying strategic development options," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 231-246, May.
    9. Adjei-Nsiah, Samuel & Gyan, Kwasi & Ahiakpa, John Kojo & Ampadu-Boakye T & Sedebo, DA, 2022. "Determinants of smallholder farmers’ willingness -to -pay for soyabean production inputs in northern Ghana," African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), vol. 22(08).
    10. Kamrath, Carolin & Rajendran, Srinivasulu & Nenguwo, Ngoni & Afari-Sefa, Victor & Broring, Stefanie, 2018. "Adoption behavior of market traders: an analysis based on Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(6), July.
    11. Areal, Francisco J. & Riesgo, Laura & Gómez-Barbero, Manuel & Rodríguez-Cerezo, Emilio, 2012. "Consequences of a coexistence policy on the adoption of GMHT crops in the European Union," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 401-411.
    12. Daxini, Amar & Ryan, Mary & O’Donoghue, Cathal & Barnes, Andrew P., 2019. "Understanding farmers’ intentions to follow a nutrient management plan using the theory of planned behaviour," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 428-437.
    13. Buckley, Cathal & Howley, Peter & Jordan, Phil, 2015. "The role of differing farming motivations on the adoption of nutrient management practices," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 4(4), July.
    14. Aashish Argade & Arnab Kumar Laha & Anand Kumar Jaiswal, 2022. "Electronic marketplaces under conditions of oligopsony and relational marketing – an empirical exploration of electronic agricultural markets in India," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1541-1554, September.
    15. Annet A. Mulema & Zelalem Lema & Elias Damtew & Aberra Adie & Zadoc Ogutu & Alan J. Duncan, 2017. "Stakeholders’ perceptions of integrated rainwater management approaches in the Blue Nile Basin of the Ethiopian highlands," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(4), pages 244-254, November.
    16. Happe, Kathrin & Balmann, Alfons & Kellermann, Konrad, 2004. "The agricultural policy simulator (AgriPoliS): an agent-based model to study structural change in agriculture (Version 1.0)," IAMO Discussion Papers 71, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    17. Dominic White & Niven Winchester, 2023. "Logs or permits? Forestry land use decisions in an emissions trading scheme," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(4), pages 558-575, October.
    18. Flight, Samantha & Turner, Lydia & Jones, Symon & Irvine, Lesley, 2019. "Npr - Coaching Results In Improved Pasture Management Practices," 22nd Congress, Tasmania, Australia, March 3-8, 2019 345933, International Farm Management Association.
    19. Schaak, Henning & Musshoff, Oliver, 2017. "Behavioral Drivers for Grazing Practices in Dairy Farming," 2017 Conference (61st), February 7-10, 2017, Brisbane, Australia 258680, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    20. Selina Bruns & Bernhard Dalheimer & Oliver Musshoff, 2022. "The effect of cognitive function on the poor's economic performance: Evidence from Cambodian smallholder farmers," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(3), pages 468-480, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy; Health Economics and Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaae14:183049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.