Author
Listed:
- Tavernier, E. M.
- Yadavalli, A.
Abstract
The recent economic turmoil has caused several countries to abandon the tenets of free trade and erect barriers in perceived self-interest. China tightened imports on food and banned Irish pork imports. India banned Chinese toys and Argentina tightened licensing requirements on textiles, auto parts and leather goods. The United States is subsidizing automakers and creating roadblocks to Mexican trucks using American roads. The countries that have taken those steps argue that free and unfettered trade that characterizes many free trade agreements leads to increase job losses. Proponents of free trade argue that such agreements promote strategic relationships and enhance social welfare and economic growth. Against this back drop whether the US should continue to pursue trade agreements is surely not trivial. The paper examines this question from the perspective of New Jersey agricultural producers. The study uses data from the 2005 National Agricultural Food and Public Policy Preference Survey. Twenty seven states participated in the survey and each state was given data relevant to that state. The New Jersey component of survey was mailed to 700 randomly selected farm operators. This number represented approximately 7% of all the farm operators in the state. A total of 162 farm operators responded to the survey, giving a response rate of 23%. However, only 141 responses were usable, resulting in a usable responsive rate of about 20%. That rate compares to the national useable rate of 24%. The paper hypothesizes that farm and ranch operator preferences regarding trade agreements are influenced by such factors as age, farm sales, income, education, and tenure or duration of farm ownership. In particular the paper hypothesizes that there exists a positive relationship between those variables and the dependent variable, i.e. whether the US should continue to pursue trade agreements. To test that hypothesis the paper uses logistic regression. The results show a positive relationship between the dependent variable and age, tenure, income and education but a negative relationship between the dependent variable and sales. The negative relationship with sales is surprising. One would expect agricultural producers to look favorably on the prospects of free trade opening foreign markets for agricultural goods.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cars11:187917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caestea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.