Author
Listed:
- Browne, Antoinette
- Pemberton, Carlisle
Abstract
Caribbean farmers are frequently bombarded by numerous production risks that not only negatively impact agricultural production, but agricultural development. Since these risks reduce agricultural production (IICA, 2006a) it is imperative that risk mitigation measures be employed to lessen the impact of risk on agricultural production. Production risks are considered by farmers to be some of the most important risks that significantly impact their livelihoods. There appears to be limited research done on the subject areas of production risks and risk behavior of farmers in Trinidad and by extension, the Caribbean. Therefore, this study seeks to identify and better understand the production risks and the risk behaviors of farmers in Trinidad. The study was conducted in seven districts of County Caroni and two districts of St. George West County, which span the northeastern area of central Trinidad. Data was collected from 227 farmers via the use of a questionnaire and field visits. Data analysis used frequency distributions, chi-square, logistic and sample selection regression models. The binary logistic regression technique was used to test the hypothesis that there is a relationship between the socioeconomic characteristics of farmers and the risk mitigation behavior of farmers. The sample selection technique was used to investigate the effects of various socioeconomic characteristics of farmers on the effectiveness of the risk mitigation measures practiced by the farmers. The results identified the following significant socioeconomic characteristics that affect risk mitigation; the time spent on the farm, age of farmer, farm size, tenure of the land, whether the farmers was the head of the household , whether the farmer cultivated crops , whether the farmer reared livestock and whether the farmer that was exposed to drought. The study has also revealed the following significant socioeconomic characteristics of farmers that determine the effectiveness of the risk mitigation measures implemented by these farmers; farm size, whether the farmer reared livestock, whether the farmer was exposed to floods and heavy rains, praedial larceny and drought.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cars11:187836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caestea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.