IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/assa24/344218.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Dynamic Regional Integrated Assessment Model to Assess the Impacts of Changing Globalization and Environmental Stewardship on the Regional Economy and Environmental Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Jeong, Junyoung
  • Cultice, Brian
  • Chun, Soomin
  • Shaffer-Morrison, C. Dale
  • Gong, Ziqian
  • Bielicki, Jeffrey
  • Cai, Yongyang
  • Irwin, Elena
  • Jackson-Smith, Douglas
  • Martin, Jay
  • Wilson, Robyn

Abstract

Changes in the global economy and climate system have large and wide-ranging repercus- sions for local and regional economies and ecosystems. Here we focus on global-to-local linkages that are hypothesized to impact water quality outcomes within a five-state Great Lakes-Corn Belt region, which includes some of the most intensive agricultural region of the Midwest. We develop a dynamic integrated assessment model (IAM) that links the regional economy to global conditions, local land use change, and water quality outcomes and use a sce- narios framework to assess the likelihood that phosphorus reduction targets for Lake Erie are met by 2050 under a range of plausible global and regional conditions. We examine the relative role that global economic and climate conditions play in regional land use and water quality outcomes and the extent to which local land stewardship incentives and best management prac- tices (BMPs) can offset the potential negative effects of global economic and environmental changes. By integrating a regional-level forward-looking dynamic model, a state-level static computable general equilibrium model, and a local-level land use change model, this IAM en- ables a comprehensive and theoretically consistent integration from global conditions through regional and local decision-making. The model simulates five scenarios defined by distinctly different combinations of global commodity prices, CO2 prices, climate conditions, produc- tivity, population, and economic growth. Our results reveal that success in attaining the policy target is relatively uncertain and highly dependent on future economic, environmental, and policy conditions. We find that only two of the scenarios are projected to attain the 40 per- cent spring DRP and TP reduction targets nine out of ten years by the 2030’s. Other results confirm that lower commodity prices generally lead to reduced cropland acres and are mostly associated with better water quality outcomes. However greater intensification of cropland use is not associated with greater water pollution, a result that may be driven by the relatively high adoption rates for subsurface placement that are reached in later years across scenarios. Taken together, these results demonstrate the potential for local policies to incentivize BMP adoption at levels that can act as a buffer to uncertain, changing global conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeong, Junyoung & Cultice, Brian & Chun, Soomin & Shaffer-Morrison, C. Dale & Gong, Ziqian & Bielicki, Jeffrey & Cai, Yongyang & Irwin, Elena & Jackson-Smith, Douglas & Martin, Jay & Wilson, Robyn, 2024. "A Dynamic Regional Integrated Assessment Model to Assess the Impacts of Changing Globalization and Environmental Stewardship on the Regional Economy and Environmental Quality," 2024 Allied Social Sciences Association (ASSA) Annual Meeting, January 5-7, 2024, San Antonio, Texas 344218, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:assa24:344218
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.344218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/344218/files/Jeong_Dynamic%20Manuscript-2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.344218?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Climate Change; Environmental Economics and Policy; Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:assa24:344218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.