IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/asea24/344443.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Valuation of Reef Tourism: A Preliminary Review and Lessons Learned for a Study in the Philippines

Author

Listed:
  • Oco, D.M.C.
  • Delos Reyes, J.A.
  • Sevilla-Nastor, J.B.
  • Roquiño, E.F.

Abstract

Coral reefs are globally important ecosystems known for their high productivity and biodiversity. These reefs offer various ecosystem services, including provisioning and regulation. The coastal environment of the Philippines is rich in a diversity of reef species and associated marine organisms, attracting tourists each year, making the country a major tourist destination in Asia, and generating livelihoods for coastal communities. Recent studies suggest declines in reef diversity and abundance due to destructive fishing methods, industrial and agricultural waste, and unsustainable urban development, threatening the tourism sector and the economic opportunities provided by the reefs. This study compiles and synthesizes existing published research articles on valuation methods commonly used to assess the benefits of reef-related tourism. Articles published in Science Direct, Scopus, and Web of Science journals were searched using the PSALSAR framework. The initial search results of 7,982 using specific terms and Boolean operators were further refined, yielding 21 articles deemed eligible for annotation and preliminary review. Results of synthesis revealed that, despite the considerable number of studies on valuation, few focused on reef-related tourism. The articles encompassed a wide range of study sites, coastal habitat characteristics, and list of tourism activities. Valuation studies for reefs are commonly conducted in sites either in protected areas e.g., marine parks or popular tourist destinations e.g., Great Barrier Reef. Moreover, economic value is obtained from revenues earned, taxes collected, tourist expenditures and cost of handling reef-associated tourism activities. In this manner, the reef is undervalued as it only reflects the indirect use value of the ecosystem services e.g., supporting, cultural. Consequently, valuation studies that measure the economic value of provisioning services e.g., fish catch, fish population, and downstream employment is lacking. There is a significant monetary amount missing in reports that represent the reef’s value in providing food and employment to the most vulnerable sector – the coastal community. Thus, reefs in the Philippines remain exploited and non-prioritized for national programs in the absence of comprehensive valuation.

Suggested Citation

  • Oco, D.M.C. & Delos Reyes, J.A. & Sevilla-Nastor, J.B. & Roquiño, E.F., 2024. "Valuation of Reef Tourism: A Preliminary Review and Lessons Learned for a Study in the Philippines," ASEAN University for Sustainable Food System, Faculty of Economics, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand, April 18-19, 2024 344443, Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:asea24:344443
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.344443
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/344443/files/Oco%2C%20D.M.C.%2C%20Delos%20Reyes%2C%20J.A.%2C%20Sevilla-Nastor%2C%20J.B.%2C%20and%20Roqui%C3%B1o%2C%20E.F..pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.344443?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Quang Hai Nguyen, 2021. "Impact of Investment in Tourism Infrastructure Development on Attracting International Visitors: A Nonlinear Panel ARDL Approach Using Vietnam’s Data," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Driml, Sally M., 1997. "Bringing ecological economics out of the wilderness," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 145-153, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olasunmbo Adhuze & Adebayo Adewole & Olawale Adeaga, 2023. "Infrastructure as Drivers for Economic Growth: A Way to advancing Tourism," International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science, International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science (IJLTEMAS), vol. 12(09), pages 86-93, September.
    2. Abdullah Uslu & Emrullah Erul & José António C. Santos & Sanja Obradović & Margarida Custódio Santos, 2023. "Determinants of Residents’ Support for Sustainable Tourism Development: An Empirical Study in Midyat, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-14, June.
    3. Laurans, Yann & Mermet, Laurent, 2014. "Ecosystem services economic valuation, decision-support system or advocacy?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 7(C), pages 98-105.
    4. Abbie A. Rogers & Marit E. Kragt & Fiona L. Gibson & Michael P. Burton & Elizabeth H. Petersen & David J. Pannell, 2015. "Non-market valuation: usage and impacts in environmental policy and management in Australia," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 59(1), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Batara Surya & Hernita Hernita & Agus Salim & Seri Suriani & Iwan Perwira & Yulia Yulia & Muhlis Ruslan & Kafrawi Yunus, 2022. "Travel-Business Stagnation and SME Business Turbulence in the Tourism Sector in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-37, February.
    6. Blanco, Ester & Lozano, Javier & Rey-Maquieira, Javier, 2009. "A dynamic approach to voluntary environmental contributions in tourism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 104-114, November.
    7. Das, Priyanka & Maitra, Swati, 2024. "Priority areas of intervention for improving pedestrian infrastructure and facilities at tourist destinations in India," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 126-136.
    8. Mallick, Sanmoy & Mitra, Professor Debabrata & Ghosh, Dr Amlan, 2021. "Selection Of Tourist Destination For Investment Decision: A Holistic Model," MPRA Paper 115369, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 03 Nov 2022.
    9. Marre, Jean-Baptiste & Thebaud, Olivier & Pascoe, Sean & Jennings, Sarah & Boncoeur, Jean & Coglan, Louisa, 2015. "The use of ecosystem services valuation in Australian coastal zone management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 117-124.
    10. Rogers, A. & Kragt, Marit Ellen & Gibson, F. & Pannell, David J. & Burton, Michael P. & Petersen, L., 2013. "Is non-market valuation used in environmental policy making?," Working Papers 156197, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    11. Chae, Dong-Ryul & Wattage, Premachandra & Pascoe, Sean, 2012. "Recreational benefits from a marine protected area: A travel cost analysis of Lundy," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 971-977.
    12. Hjerpe, Evan E., 2018. "Outdoor Recreation as a Sustainable Export Industry: A Case Study of the Boundary Waters Wilderness," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 60-68.
    13. Ioana Meșter & Ramona Simuț & Liana Meșter & Dorin Bâc, 2023. "An Investigation of Tourism, Economic Growth, CO 2 Emissions, Trade Openness and Energy Intensity Index Nexus: Evidence for the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-26, May.
    14. Viera Ivankova & Beata Gavurova & Radovan Bačík & Martin Rigelský, 2021. "Relationships between road transport infrastructure and tourism spending: A development approach in European OECD countries," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 9(2), pages 535-551, December.
    15. Erick Lahura & Rosario Sabrera, 2023. "The effect of infrastructure investment on tourism demand: a synthetic control approach for the case of Kuelap, Peru," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 443-478, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asea24:344443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://asean.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.