IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/anueir/244018.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Environmental, Economic and Social Condition of the Phou Khao Khouay National Protected Area's Green Peafowl Species Conservation Zone

Author

Listed:
  • Tsechalicha, Xiong
  • Pangxang, Yiakhang
  • Phoyduangsy, Saysamone
  • Kyophilavong, Phouphet

Abstract

This Research Report presents baseline information for the development of a Payments for Environmental Services scheme based on the situation of the Green Peafowl Protection Zone within the Phou Khao Khouay National Protected Area in central Lao PDR. It identifies threats to wildlife arising from current management practices and suggests possible management actions to achieve improvements in the protection of the Green Peafowl.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsechalicha, Xiong & Pangxang, Yiakhang & Phoyduangsy, Saysamone & Kyophilavong, Phouphet, 2014. "The Environmental, Economic and Social Condition of the Phou Khao Khouay National Protected Area's Green Peafowl Species Conservation Zone," Research Reports 244018, Australian National University, Effective Implementation of Payments for Environmental Services in Lao PDR.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:anueir:244018
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.244018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/244018/files/Research%20Report%206.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.244018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sirivongs, Khamfeua & Tsuchiya, Toshiyuki, 2012. "Relationship between local residents' perceptions, attitudes and participation towards national protected areas: A case study of Phou Khao Khouay National Protected Area, central Lao PDR," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 92-100.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Imran, Sophia & Alam, Khorshed & Beaumont, Narelle, 2014. "Environmental orientations and environmental behaviour: Perceptions of protected area tourism stakeholders," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 290-299.
    2. Else Ragni Yttredal & Nathalie Homlong, 2020. "Perception of Sustainable Development in a Local World Heritage Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Yajun Jiang & Yu Guo & Huiling Zhou, 2023. "Residents’ Perception of Tourism Impact, Participation and Support in Destinations under the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Intermediary Role of Government Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Yaquan Dou & Changhao Wu & Youjun He, 2023. "Public Concern and Awareness of National Parks in China: Evidence from Social Media Big Data and Questionnaire Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Tiantian Tang & Minyan Zhao & Dan Wang & Xiangyu Chen & Wuqiang Chen & Chunwen Xie & Yan Ding, 2022. "Does Environmental Interpretation Impact Public Ecological Flow Experience and Responsible Behavior? A Case Study of Potatso National Park, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Vikram S. Negi & R.K. Maikhuri, 2017. "Forest resources consumption pattern in Govind Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Himalaya, India," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(7), pages 1235-1252, July.
    7. Arsić, Sanela & Nikolić, Djordje & Živković, Živan, 2017. "Hybrid SWOT - ANP - FANP model for prioritization strategies of sustainable development of ecotourism in National Park Djerdap, Serbia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 11-26.
    8. Song Lu & Zehui Zhou & Yingfan Lu, 2022. "Rural Residents’ Perceptions, Attitudes, and Environmentally Responsible Behaviors towards Garbage Exchange Supermarkets: An Example from Huangshan City in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Taboka, Sekgopa Kealeboga, 2016. "Evaluation Of The Impact Of Backyard Gardens On Household Incomes In Southern District, Botswana," Research Theses 265674, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    10. Qi Wang & Yue’e Liao & Jun Gao, 2022. "Rural Residents’ Intention to Participate in Pro-Poor Tourism in Southern Xinjiang: A Theory of Planned Behavior Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Gebregziabher, Dawit & Soltani, Arezoo, 2019. "Exclosures in people’s minds: perceptions and attitudes in the Tigray region, Ethiopia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 1-14.
    12. Fang Han & Zhaoping Yang & Hui Shi & Qun Liu & Geoffrey Wall, 2016. "How to Promote Sustainable Relationships between Heritage Conservation and Community, Based on a Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-11, September.
    13. Zhang, Junze & Yin, Nan & Wang, Shuai & Yu, Jianping & Zhao, Wenwu & Fu, Bojie, 2020. "A multiple importance–satisfaction analysis framework for the sustainable management of protected areas: Integrating ecosystem services and basic needs," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    14. Liu, Jing & Lin, Hua & Hu, Bing & Zhou, Zixiong & Agyeiwaah, Elizabeth & Xu, Ye, 2022. "Advancing the understanding of the resident pro-tourism behavior scale: An integration of item response theory and classical test theory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 113-125.
    15. Ben Ma & Zheng Zhao & Huimin Ding & Yali Wen, 2018. "Household costs and benefits of biodiversity conservation: case study of Sichuan giant panda reserves in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1665-1686, August.
    16. Esteban Pérez-Calderón & Jorge Manuel Prieto-Ballester & Vanessa Miguel-Barrado, 2022. "Perceived Rural Development in UNESCO Global Geoparks in Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, July.
    17. Rastogi, Archi & Hickey, Gordon M. & Anand, Anupam & Badola, Ruchi & Hussain, Syed Ainul, 2015. "Wildlife-tourism, local communities and tiger conservation: A village-level study in Corbett Tiger Reserve, India," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 11-19.
    18. Ma, Ben & Cai, Zhen & Zheng, Jie & Wen, Yali, 2019. "Conservation, ecotourism, poverty, and income inequality – A case study of nature reserves in Qinling, China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 236-244.
    19. Arsić, Sanela & Nikolić, Djordje & Mihajlović, Ivan & Fedajev, Aleksandra & Živković, Živan, 2018. "A New Approach Within ANP-SWOT Framework for Prioritization of Ecosystem Management and Case Study of National Park Djerdap, Serbia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 85-95.
    20. Xiaoying Wang & Hangang Hu & Aifeng Ning & Guan Li & Xueqi Wang, 2022. "The Impact of Farmers’ Perception on Their Cultivated Land Quality Protection Behavior: A Case Study of Ningbo, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Economics and Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:anueir:244018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/asanuau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.