IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i15p9630-d880920.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Environmental Interpretation Impact Public Ecological Flow Experience and Responsible Behavior? A Case Study of Potatso National Park, China

Author

Listed:
  • Tiantian Tang

    (College of Biodiversity Conservation, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

  • Minyan Zhao

    (Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Dan Wang

    (School of International Chinese Language Education, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China)

  • Xiangyu Chen

    (School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia)

  • Wuqiang Chen

    (School of Economics and Management, Yunnan Forestry Technological College, Kunming 650224, China)

  • Chunwen Xie

    (School of Geography and Ecotourism, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

  • Yan Ding

    (School of Geography and Ecotourism, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

Abstract

Being responsible for ensuring nature preservation, environmental interpretation raises people’s awareness of nature preservation as a form of public service, and enhance their environmentally responsible behavior. Based on the flow theory, this study proposes a conceptual model of environmental interpretation impacts on visit motivation, ecological experience, environmental attitudes, and environmental behaviors. Selecting the users (visitors) of environmental interpretation at Potatso National Park in Shangri-La, Yunnan Province, China, we obtained 568 valid questionnaires and used Amos software to analyze a structural equation model to verify the model. The results indicate that the environmental interpretation plays a significant role in enriching the public’s ecological experience, which is an intermediary variable in which visiting motivation influences environmental attitudes and guides environmentally responsible behavior. The research suggests that national parks should strengthen the environmental interpretation facilities experiential and available, and adjust the configuration of the existing interpretation media in the three-dimensional structure of theme, space, and time, considering the motivation of the public visits, enriching ecological experience, and inspiring service details.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiantian Tang & Minyan Zhao & Dan Wang & Xiangyu Chen & Wuqiang Chen & Chunwen Xie & Yan Ding, 2022. "Does Environmental Interpretation Impact Public Ecological Flow Experience and Responsible Behavior? A Case Study of Potatso National Park, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9630-:d:880920
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9630/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9630/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sirivongs, Khamfeua & Tsuchiya, Toshiyuki, 2012. "Relationship between local residents' perceptions, attitudes and participation towards national protected areas: A case study of Phou Khao Khouay National Protected Area, central Lao PDR," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 92-100.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Imran, Sophia & Alam, Khorshed & Beaumont, Narelle, 2014. "Environmental orientations and environmental behaviour: Perceptions of protected area tourism stakeholders," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 290-299.
    2. Else Ragni Yttredal & Nathalie Homlong, 2020. "Perception of Sustainable Development in a Local World Heritage Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Yajun Jiang & Yu Guo & Huiling Zhou, 2023. "Residents’ Perception of Tourism Impact, Participation and Support in Destinations under the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Intermediary Role of Government Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Yaquan Dou & Changhao Wu & Youjun He, 2023. "Public Concern and Awareness of National Parks in China: Evidence from Social Media Big Data and Questionnaire Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Vikram S. Negi & R.K. Maikhuri, 2017. "Forest resources consumption pattern in Govind Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Himalaya, India," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(7), pages 1235-1252, July.
    6. Arsić, Sanela & Nikolić, Djordje & Živković, Živan, 2017. "Hybrid SWOT - ANP - FANP model for prioritization strategies of sustainable development of ecotourism in National Park Djerdap, Serbia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 11-26.
    7. Song Lu & Zehui Zhou & Yingfan Lu, 2022. "Rural Residents’ Perceptions, Attitudes, and Environmentally Responsible Behaviors towards Garbage Exchange Supermarkets: An Example from Huangshan City in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Taboka, Sekgopa Kealeboga, 2016. "Evaluation Of The Impact Of Backyard Gardens On Household Incomes In Southern District, Botswana," Research Theses 265674, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    9. Qi Wang & Yue’e Liao & Jun Gao, 2022. "Rural Residents’ Intention to Participate in Pro-Poor Tourism in Southern Xinjiang: A Theory of Planned Behavior Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Gebregziabher, Dawit & Soltani, Arezoo, 2019. "Exclosures in people’s minds: perceptions and attitudes in the Tigray region, Ethiopia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 1-14.
    11. Fang Han & Zhaoping Yang & Hui Shi & Qun Liu & Geoffrey Wall, 2016. "How to Promote Sustainable Relationships between Heritage Conservation and Community, Based on a Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-11, September.
    12. Zhang, Junze & Yin, Nan & Wang, Shuai & Yu, Jianping & Zhao, Wenwu & Fu, Bojie, 2020. "A multiple importance–satisfaction analysis framework for the sustainable management of protected areas: Integrating ecosystem services and basic needs," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    13. Liu, Jing & Lin, Hua & Hu, Bing & Zhou, Zixiong & Agyeiwaah, Elizabeth & Xu, Ye, 2022. "Advancing the understanding of the resident pro-tourism behavior scale: An integration of item response theory and classical test theory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 113-125.
    14. Ben Ma & Zheng Zhao & Huimin Ding & Yali Wen, 2018. "Household costs and benefits of biodiversity conservation: case study of Sichuan giant panda reserves in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1665-1686, August.
    15. Esteban Pérez-Calderón & Jorge Manuel Prieto-Ballester & Vanessa Miguel-Barrado, 2022. "Perceived Rural Development in UNESCO Global Geoparks in Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, July.
    16. Rastogi, Archi & Hickey, Gordon M. & Anand, Anupam & Badola, Ruchi & Hussain, Syed Ainul, 2015. "Wildlife-tourism, local communities and tiger conservation: A village-level study in Corbett Tiger Reserve, India," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 11-19.
    17. Ma, Ben & Cai, Zhen & Zheng, Jie & Wen, Yali, 2019. "Conservation, ecotourism, poverty, and income inequality – A case study of nature reserves in Qinling, China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 236-244.
    18. Tsechalicha, Xiong & Pangxang, Yiakhang & Phoyduangsy, Saysamone & Kyophilavong, Phouphet, 2014. "The Environmental, Economic and Social Condition of the Phou Khao Khouay National Protected Area's Green Peafowl Species Conservation Zone," Research Reports 244018, Australian National University, Effective Implementation of Payments for Environmental Services in Lao PDR.
    19. Arsić, Sanela & Nikolić, Djordje & Mihajlović, Ivan & Fedajev, Aleksandra & Živković, Živan, 2018. "A New Approach Within ANP-SWOT Framework for Prioritization of Ecosystem Management and Case Study of National Park Djerdap, Serbia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 85-95.
    20. Xiaoying Wang & Hangang Hu & Aifeng Ning & Guan Li & Xueqi Wang, 2022. "The Impact of Farmers’ Perception on Their Cultivated Land Quality Protection Behavior: A Case Study of Ningbo, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9630-:d:880920. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.