IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aare95/171139.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analysis of Growth and Stabilisation Policies for the Indonesian Livestock Sector - A Linked Modelling Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Trewin, Ray
  • Rosegrant, Mark
  • Erwidodo

Abstract

A key issue for Indonesian policy makers as the economy grows and internationalises is how to maintain agricultural productivity growth and reap the benefits of stable prices without the increasing costs of current policies The Indonesian livestock sector is becoming a focus of attention in this regard because of the marked changes taking place in incomes and consumption patterns, and the production links with the important grains sector. Indonesian livestock supply and demand responses are estimated for incorporation into an extension of an Indonesian food crop supply and demand model (FCSD) in order to evaluate various policies such as those that affect input and output prices. These estimates are also incorporated into a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model of the Indonesian economy with an emphasis on agriculture (INDOGEM) to enable complementary analysis of such policies, taking account of additional aspects such as budgetary constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Trewin, Ray & Rosegrant, Mark & Erwidodo, 1995. "Analysis of Growth and Stabilisation Policies for the Indonesian Livestock Sector - A Linked Modelling Approach," 1995 Conference (39th), February 14-16, 1995, Perth, Australia 171139, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aare95:171139
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.171139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/171139/files/1995-10-17-19.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.171139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kanbur, S M Ravi, 1984. "How to Analyse Commodity Price Stabilization? A Review Article," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 36(3), pages 336-358, November.
    2. Tyers,Rod & Anderson,Kym, 1992. "Disarray in World Food Markets," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521351058.
    3. Tyers,Rod & Anderson,Kym, 2011. "Disarray in World Food Markets," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521172318.
    4. Adams, Philip D. & Dixon, Peter B. & McDonald, Daina & Meagher, G. A. & Parmenter, Brian R., 1994. "Forecasts for the Australian economy using the MONASH model," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 557-571, December.
    5. Trewin, Ray & Erwidodo & Rachmat, Muchjidin, 1994. "Improving Policy Analysis by Linking An Indonesian CGE and Agricultural Sector Models," 1994 Conference (38th), February 8-10, 1994, Wellington, New Zealand 148755, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    6. Alain de Janvry & Elisabeth Sadoulet, 1987. "Agricultural Price Policy in General Equilibrium Models: Results and Comparisons," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(2), pages 230-246.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rutherford, A. S., 1999. "Meat and milk self-sufficiency in Asia: forecast trends and implications," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 21(1), pages 21-39, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harvey, David R., 2003. "Policy Dependency And Reform: Economic Gains Versus Political Pains," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25865, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Unnevehr, Laurian J., 2000. "Food safety issues and fresh food product exports from LDCs," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 231-240, September.
    3. Lips, Markus & Rieder, Peter, 2002. "Endogenous adjusted Output Quotas - The Abolishment of the Raw Milk Quota in the European Union," Conference papers 330980, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    4. Kym Anderson, 2006. "Reducing Distortions to Agricultural Incentives: Progress, Pitfalls, and Prospects," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 88(5), pages 1135-1146.
    5. Harvey, David R., 2004. "Policy dependency and reform: economic gains versus political pains," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 31(2-3), pages 265-275, December.
    6. Martin, Will, 2021. "Tools for measuring the full impacts of agricultural interventions," IFPRI-MCC technical papers 2, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    7. Pierre Van Der Eng, 2004. "Productivity and Comparative Advantage in Rice Agriculture in South‐East Asia Since 1870," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 18(4), pages 345-370, December.
    8. Kym Anderson & Ernesto Valenzuela, 2021. "What impact are subsidies and trade barriers abroad having on Australasian and Brazilian agriculture?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 65(2), pages 265-290, April.
    9. Fock, Achim & von Ledebur, Oliver, 1998. "Struktur und Potentiale des Agraraußenhandels Mittel- und Osteuropas," IAMO Discussion Papers 14, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    10. Fabienne Féménia & Alexandre Gohin, 2010. "Faut-il une intervention publique pour stabiliser les marchés agricoles ? Revue des questions non résolues," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 91(4), pages 435-456.
    11. Bailey, A. & Williams, N. & Palmer, M. & Geering, R., 2000. "The farmer as service provider: the demand for agricultural commodities and equine services," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 191-204, December.
    12. Thompson, Stanley R. & Bohl, Martin T., 1999. "International Wheat Price Transmission And Cap Reform," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21705, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    13. Mohamed Abdelasset Chemingui, 2011. "Welfare Effects From Reforming Agricultural Policies In Rich Countries In A Spatially Small Heterogeneous Agricultural Economy," Middle East Development Journal (MEDJ), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(02), pages 191-213.
    14. Ernesto Valenzuela & Kym Anderson & Thomas Hertel, 2008. "Impacts of trade reform: sensitivity of model results to key assumptions," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 395-420, February.
    15. Femenia, Fabienne, 2010. "Impacts of Stockholding Behaviour on Agricultural Market Volatility: A Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium Approach," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 59(3).
    16. Mahia, R. & Arce, Rafael de & Escribano, Gonzalo, 2005. "La protección arancelaria al comercio agrícola mundial diez años después de la firma del acuerdo sobre agricultura de la Ronda Uruguay [Agricultural Trade Barriers 10 years later Uruguay Round Trad," MPRA Paper 10460, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Baffes, John & Meerman, Jacob, 1998. "From Prices to Incomes: Agricultural Subsidization without Protection?," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 13(2), pages 191-211, August.
    18. Anderson, Kym, 1995. "Impacts of New Multilateral and Regional Integration Agreements on Agricultural Competitiveness of Advanced Economies," 1994 Conference, August 22-29, 1994, Harare, Zimbabwe 183378, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Kym Anderson & James Giesecke & Ernesto Valenzuela, 2010. "How would global trade liberalization affect rural and regional incomes in Australia?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 54(4), pages 389-406, October.
    20. Pedro Moncarz & Sergio Barone & Germán Calfat & Ricardo Descalzi, 2017. "Poverty Impacts of Changes in the International Prices of Agricultural Commodities: Recent Evidence for Argentina (An Ex-Ante Analysis)," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(3), pages 375-395, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aare95:171139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.