IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aare16/235624.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Natural resource management planning: can more cost effective outcomes be achieved

Author

Listed:
  • Star, Megan
  • Rolfe, John
  • Beutel, Terry
  • McCosker, Kev
  • Ellis, Robin
  • Coughlin, Tom

Abstract

The decline in health of the Great Barrier Reef and the pressure on allocating funds efficiently has resulted in the catchments adjacent to the reef revising their Water Quality Improvement Plans. The Fitzroy basin and coastal catchments is 152,000km2 and geographically diverse, past work has identified the need to prioritise funds to achieve cost effective outcomes. For this paper we aim to present an alternative approach to effective prioritisation of sediment reductions. The approach integrates spatial information regarding the sediment source and process, levels of adoption, bare ground cover, and cost into a function to rank neighbourhood catchments. The results identify particular areas of the catchment and also demonstrate the complexity of the issue and the challenge the Fitzroy Basin Association faces when allocating funds. It does however demonstrate that there are effective opportunities in particular areas within the catchment, proving it to be a useful approach in understanding where in the catchment to focus efforts for different sediment reductions.

Suggested Citation

  • Star, Megan & Rolfe, John & Beutel, Terry & McCosker, Kev & Ellis, Robin & Coughlin, Tom, 2016. "Natural resource management planning: can more cost effective outcomes be achieved," 2016 Conference (60th), February 2-5, 2016, Canberra, Australia 235624, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aare16:235624
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.235624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/235624/files/Star%20paper%20upload.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.235624?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pannell, David J. & Roberts, Anna M., 2010. "Australia’s National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality: a retrospective assessment," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 54(4), pages 1-20.
    2. McIvor, John G. & Monypenny, Richard, 1995. "Evaluation of pasture management systems for beef production in the semi-arid tropics: Model development," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 45-67.
    3. MacLeod, N.D. & McIvor, J.G., 2008. "Quantifying production-environment tradeoffs for grazing land management -- A case example from the Australian rangelands," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 488-497, April.
    4. Pannell, David J., 2009. "Australian environmental and natural resource policy – from the Natural Heritage Trust to Caring for our Country," 2009 Conference (53rd), February 11-13, 2009, Cairns, Australia 47935, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ash, Andrew & Hunt, Leigh & McDonald, Cam & Scanlan, Joe & Bell, Lindsay & Cowley, Robyn & Watson, Ian & McIvor, John & MacLeod, Neil, 2015. "Boosting the productivity and profitability of northern Australian beef enterprises: Exploring innovation options using simulation modelling and systems analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 50-65.
    2. Monjardino, M. & MacLeod, N. & McKellar, L. & Prestwidge, D., 2015. "Economic evaluation of irrigated forage production in a beef cattle operation in the semi-arid tropics of northern Australia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 122-143.
    3. Jackson, N. & Walter, M. & Felmingham, B. & Spinaze, A., 2006. "Will Older Workers Change Their Retirement Plans in Line with Government Thinking? A Review of Recent Literature on Retirement Intentions," Australian Bulletin of Labour, National Institute of Labour Studies, vol. 32(4), pages 315-344.
    4. Walstab, Anne & Lamb, Stephen, 2009. "Participation in VET across Australia: a regional analysis," Australian Bulletin of Labour, National Institute of Labour Studies, vol. 35(2), pages 452-487.
    5. Windle, Jill & Rolfe, John, 2010. "Assessing community values for reducing agricultural emissions to improve water quality and protect coral health in the Great Barrier Reef," Research Reports 107583, Australian National University, Environmental Economics Research Hub.
    6. Robbins, W., 2010. "Learning with Hard Labour: University Students as Workers," Australian Bulletin of Labour, National Institute of Labour Studies, vol. 36(1), pages 103-120.
    7. Tan, Yan & Lester, Laurence Howard & Richardson, Susan (Sue), 2008. "Labour Force Projections: A Case Study of the Greater Metropolitan Area of New South Wales," Australian Bulletin of Labour, National Institute of Labour Studies, vol. 34(1), pages 79-99.
    8. Guthrie, R. & Purse, Kevin & Lurie, P., 2006. "Workers' Compensation Western Australia; a Case Study 1993 - 2004," Australian Bulletin of Labour, National Institute of Labour Studies, vol. 32(1), pages 62-73.
    9. Peetz, D. & Muurlink, O. & Townsend, K. & Allan, C. & Fox, A., 2011. "Quality and Quantity in Work-Home Conflict: The Nature and Direction of Effects of Work on Employees' Personal Relationships and Partners," Australian Bulletin of Labour, National Institute of Labour Studies, vol. 37(2), pages 138-163.
    10. Emile Noël, 1996. "Quelques réflexions sur les perspectives politico-institutionnelles de l'intégration européenne en 2000 et au-delà," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 39, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    11. Karin Fierke & Antje Wiener, 1999. "Constructing Institutional Interests: EU and NATO Enlargement," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 14, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    12. Leslie Holmes, 1997. "The Democratic State or State Democracy? Problems of Post-Communist Transition," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 48, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    13. Skinner, N & Pocock, Barbara, 2010. "Work, Life, Flexibility and Workplace Culture in Australia: Results of the 2009 Australian Work and Life Index (AWALI) Survey," Australian Bulletin of Labour, National Institute of Labour Studies, vol. 36(2), pages 133-153.
    14. Burgess, J. & Lewer, J. & Waring, P., 2006. "Protecting Employee Entitlements: Corporate Governance and Industrial Democracy in Australia," Australian Bulletin of Labour, National Institute of Labour Studies, vol. 32(4), pages 365-380.
    15. Pannell, David J., 2013. "Ranking Environmental Projects," Working Papers 156482, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    16. Rodriguez Iglesias, 1996. "Le pouvoir judiciaire de la Communauté européenne au stade actuel de l'évolution de l'Union," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 41, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    17. Tani, Massimiliano, 2012. "Does immigration policy affect the education--occupation mismatch? Evidence from Australia," Australian Bulletin of Labour, National Institute of Labour Studies, vol. 38(2), pages 111-141.
    18. Wooden, M., 2010. "Symposium 3: An Unfair Safety Net," Australian Bulletin of Labour, National Institute of Labour Studies, vol. 36(3), pages 321-326.
    19. Modongo, Oteng & Kulshreshtha, Suren N., 2018. "Economics of mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from beef production in western Canada," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 229-238.
    20. Liesbet Hooghe, 1998. "Supranational Activists or Intergovernmental Agents? Explaining the Orientation of Senior Commission Officals Towards European Integration," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 36, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Economics and Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aare16:235624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.