IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aare12/124291.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Institution of Ground Water Market for Management of Ground Water Resource: A Study from Assam in Northeast India

Author

Listed:
  • Dutta, Mrinal Kanti

Abstract

Assam in the north eastern region of India has the endowments to ensure agricultural growth in the sense that the state has huge reserves of ground water in addition to the enormous surface water availability. Returns to both labor and capital in the state are considered high as potentials for exploiting the existing technology are yet largely untapped. As insufficient irrigation infrastructure is identified as a major constraint on exploiting such potentials, investment for expanding irrigation capacity is needed. At the same time, putting necessary institutions in place to ensure that the installed capacity is effectively utilized is also equally important. Compared to relatively larger government irrigation schemes, the privately owned and operated tube well based small scale projects in the state have relatively better utilization efficiency. However, utilisation of irrigation potential of these schemes is also affected by fragmented and small size of holdings in the state. Emergence of the institution of ground water markets, however, is expected to improve utilisation efficiency of irrigation as it can make optimal use of the scarce natural resource of ground water. To investigate into some of the questions related with enhancing utilization efficiency and better management of the common pool resource of ground water, a study of ground water markets in Assam was taken up. Using inputs from field investigations, the study examined the nature of ground water markets in the state, the issue of reliability of water supply and the conditions for viability of this market for ensuring better management of ground water resource in Assam. The study points out that apart from improving utilization efficiency of irrigation, reliability of water use has also increased considerably with emergence of ground water markets in the state.

Suggested Citation

  • Dutta, Mrinal Kanti, 2012. "Institution of Ground Water Market for Management of Ground Water Resource: A Study from Assam in Northeast India," 2012 Conference (56th), February 7-10, 2012, Fremantle, Australia 124291, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aare12:124291
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.124291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/124291/files/2012AC%20Dutta%20CP.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.124291?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Easter, K William & Rosegrant, Mark W & Dinar, Ariel, 1999. "Formal and Informal Markets for Water: Institutions, Performance, and Constraints," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 14(1), pages 99-116, February.
    2. Palanisami, K. & Easter, K. William, 1991. "Hydro-Economic Interaction between Tank Storage and Groundwater Recharge," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 46(2), April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jitu Tamuli & Mrinal Kanti Dutta, 2015. "What Determines Farmers’ Decision to Buy Irrigation Water in Water Abundant Regions? A Study of Groundwater Markets in Assam in Eastern India," Working Papers 2015.03, International Network for Economic Research - INFER.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Françeska Tomori & Erik Ansink & Harold Houba & Nick Hagerty & Charles Bos, 2024. "Market power in California's water market," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(3), pages 1274-1299, May.
    2. Rimsaite, Renata & Fisher-Vanden, Karen A. & Olmstead, Sheila M., 2016. "Price Efficiency in U.S. Water Rights Markets," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 243124, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Molle, Francois & Berkoff, Jeremy, 2007. "Water pricing in irrigation: the lifetime of an idea," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    4. R. Quentin Grafton & Clay Landry & Gary D. Libecap & Sam McGlennon & Bob O’Brien, 2010. "An Integrated Assessment of Water Markets: Australia, Chile, China, South Africa and the USA," ICER Working Papers 32-2010, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research.
    5. M Ejaz Qureshi & Tian Shi & Sumaira Qureshi & Wendy Proctor & Mac Kirby, 2009. "Removing Barriers to Facilitate Efficient Water Markets in the Murray Darling Basin – A Case Study from Australia," Socio-Economics and the Environment in Discussion (SEED) Working Paper Series 2009-02, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems.
    6. John F. Raffensperger & Mark W. Milke & E. Grant Read, 2009. "A Deterministic Smart Market Model for Groundwater," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1333-1346, December.
    7. Hansen, Kristiana, 2010. "Water Markets and Water Rights Markets in the Western United States," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 9(2), pages 1-10.
    8. Easter, K. William & Hearne, Robert R., 1994. "Water Markets And Decentralized Water Resources Management," Staff Papers 13864, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    9. Sittidaj Pongkijvorasin & James Roumasset, 2007. "Optimal Conjunctive Use of Surface and Groundwater with Recharge and Return Flows: Dynamic and Spatial Patterns," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 29(3), pages 531-539.
    10. Ansink, Erik & Houba, Harold, 2012. "Market power in water markets," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 237-252.
    11. Kristiana Hansen & Jonathan Kaplan & Stephan Kroll, 2014. "Valuing Options in Water Markets: A Laboratory Investigation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 57(1), pages 59-80, January.
    12. Rouhi-Rad, Mani & Brozovic, Nicholas & Mieno, Taro, 2015. "Implications of Search Frictions for Tradeable Permit Markets," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205798, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Basil Sharp, 2002. "Institutions and Decision Making for Sustainable Development," Treasury Working Paper Series 02/20, New Zealand Treasury.
    14. Molle, Francois & Berkoff, J., 2007. "Water pricing in irrigation: the lifetime of an idea," IWMI Books, Reports H040600, International Water Management Institute.
    15. Shiferaw, Bekele & Reddy, V. Ratna & Wani, Suhas P., 2008. "Watershed externalities, shifting cropping patterns and groundwater depletion in Indian semi-arid villages: The effect of alternative water pricing policies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 327-340, September.
    16. Easter, K. William & Feder, Gershon, 1996. "Water Institutions And Economic Incentives To Ameliorate Market And Government Failures," Staff Papers 14217, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    17. Yi Liu & Peng Li & Zhiwei Zhang, 2018. "Resilient or Not: A Comparative Case Study of Ten Local Water Markets in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    18. Ravinder Gautam, 2024. "Groundwater Markets structure and its evolution: a study of Karnal District, Haryana, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 1-36, August.
    19. repec:ags:aaea16:236373 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Julia de Frutos Cachorro & Katrin Erdlenbruch & Mabel Tidball, 2017. "A dynamic model of irrigation and land-use choice: application to the Beauce aquifer in France," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 44(1), pages 99-120.
    21. Tomori, Françeska & Ansink, Erik & Houba, Harold & Hagerty, Nick & Bos, Charles, 2021. "Market power in California’s water market," Working Papers 2072/534854, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aare12:124291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.